<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Investment News: Money Morning &#187; U.S. Investors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moneymorning.com/category/u.s.-investors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moneymorning.com</link>
	<description>Investment News Provider</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:52:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>With the New Russian President Vowing to Steer a Steady Ship, U.S. Investors Can Look to Profit</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/09/with-the-new-russian-president-vowing-to-steer-a-steady-ship-us-investors-can-look-to-profit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/09/with-the-new-russian-president-vowing-to-steer-a-steady-ship-us-investors-can-look-to-profit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 22:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Hutchinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Essay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Hutchinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Investors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/09/with-the-new-russian-president-vowing-to-steer-a-steady-ship-u.s.-investors-can-look-to-profit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By  Martin Hutchinson
Contributing Editor
New  Russian President Dmitry  Medvedev wants better links with Europe. Judging by the performance of  outgoing President Vladimir  Putin, Europe should beware: The so-called &#34;links&#34; he&#8217;s seeking may  resemble those used to chain together prisoners in the Gulag.
On the  other hand &#8211; though it&#8217;s admittedly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>By  Martin Hutchinson<br />
Contributing Editor</strong></p>
<p>New  Russian President <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dmitry_Medvedev">Dmitry  Medvedev</a> wants better links with Europe. Judging by the performance of  outgoing President <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Putin">Vladimir  Putin</a>, Europe should beware: The so-called &quot;links&quot; he&#8217;s seeking may  resemble those used to chain together prisoners in the Gulag.</p>
<p>On the  other hand &#8211; though it&#8217;s admittedly unpleasant to say so &#8211; there&#8217;s a point at  which the effects of high oil prices are so great that in the short run they  far outweigh one&#8217;s distaste for the thuggish Russian regime. And at $123 a  barrel, we may be at that point.</p>
<p>Politically,  Russia has pretty much reverted to the pre-1991 Soviet system.</p>
<p>Today,  just like then, there&#8217;s only one real party: The United Russia party, which  controls 315 of the 450 seats in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duma">Duma</a> (essentially the lower house of parliament) and whose leader is one Vladimir  Vladimirovich Putin. There is considerable censorship of the media, and  dissident reporters and editors have a habit of disappearing &#8211; not that there  are many left now. There is huge emphasis on military power, and on throwing  Russia&#8217;s weight around in foreign policy.</p>
<h3>What&#8217;s New About the &quot;New&quot; Russia</h3>
<p>However,  there are a couple of significant economic differences between today&#8217;s Russia  and the pre-1991 Soviet Union. One key difference is economic: While the state  still controls most of the property today, it doesn&#8217;t control all of it, as it  did before 1991. Even so, foreign investment in strategic sectors of the  Russian economy was effectively banned by a decree of May 5. For this purpose  &quot;strategic&quot; covers not only the military sector and energy, but also more than  half of Russia&#8217;s output. </p>
<p><b>Story continues below&#8230;</b></p>
<table align="center" style="background:#E0E7C2">
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Sign up right now, and we&#8217;ll send you an important new report for free: &#8220;The Three Best Investments in Asia.&#8221;</font></strong>
				</p>
<form method="post" action="http://www.aweber.com/scripts/addlead.pl">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_web_form_id" value="163867">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_split_id" value="">
<input type="hidden" name="unit" value="money-morning">
<input type="hidden" name="redirect" value="http://www.moneymorning.com/confirmsiup">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_redirect_onlist" value="">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_adtracking" value="X300HJG4">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_message" value="1">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_required" value="from">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_forward_vars" value="0">
<form method="post" action="http://www.aweber.com/scripts/addlead.pl">
            <center> <img src="http://www.moneymorning.com/images2/MMSignUp.gif" /><br />
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><br />
      </font> </p>
<input type="submit" name="submit" value="Subscribe Now!" onClick="var s=s_gi(s_account); s.linkTrackVars='eVar2,eVar10,events'; s.linkTrackEvents='event3'; s.events='event3'; s.eVar10 ='59'; s.tl(this,'o','Subscribe to Newsletter');" />
<input type="text" name="from" value="" size="20" />
</center><br />
</form>
<p></font></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>So, if  the afore-mentioned difference is one of substance, this next one is all about  style. Prior  to 1991, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politburo">Politburo</a> members  were relatively impoverished and notorious for their baggy Soviet suits and  lack of fashion sense; these days, the top brass &#8211; and especially Putin &#8211; are  snappy dressers with a nice Italian wardrobe, and bank accounts to match.</p>
<p>Putin&#8217;s  even viewed as a sex symbol: In a recent No. 1 single in Russia, a female pop  star cooed that she needed a new boyfriend and that &quot;<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OFOPd6pgjI">Takogo kak Putin</a>&#8221; (he  must be like Putin), and not a useless wimp like her last beau!</p>
<p>If you  analyze the economic impact of Putin&#8217;s regime since 2000, you&#8217;ll find the  result has been huge economic growth &#8211; an annual average of nearly 10% since  that time with growth of  8.1% in 2007. Now a certain percentage of that was due to the proverbial &quot;dead-cat  bounce&quot; as the economy recovered from the debilitated state it had reached by  1998-99. An additional portion reflected the benefit of a Ronald Reaganesque  tax reform passed in 2001, which produced a &quot;flat tax&quot; income-tax system with a  rate of 13%. </p>
<p>That  caused many conservative U.S. commentators to favor the Putin regime in its  early years, despite the signs of human rights abuses. However, since the arrest and imprisonment of oil company tycoon <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Khodorkovsky">Mikhail Khodorkovsky</a> and the looting of his company <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YUKOS">Yukos</a>,  it has become obvious that the nominal rate of income tax doesn&#8217;t matter much  when the state can &#8211; and does &#8211; seize anything it wants. </p>
<p>Since  at least 2004, Russia&#8217;s economic growth has been driven almost entirely by high  oil prices. At first, oil production increased along with prices, producing  real economic progress. Since Putin&#8217;s partial seizure of Royal Dutch Shell PLC  (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ARDS.A">RDS.A</a>, <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ARDS.b">RDS.B</a>) concessions  in 2006 <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/08/bp-caving-to-kremlin-pressure-over-joint-venture/">and  BP PLC</a> (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABP">BP</a>)  earlier this year, it has become obvious that the Russian state will control  all economic activity in the energy sector. As a result, output has now stopped  increasing and in this year&#8217;s first quarter it actually declined slightly.</p>
<p>I  wouldn&#8217;t want to be a wealthy entrepreneur in today&#8217;s Russia, no matter how  many bodyguards I surrounded myself with. At the same time, however, there&#8217;s  also no question that some of the benefits of economic growth have gone to the  Russian people &#8211; something that was rarely, if ever, true under the old Soviet  system.</p>
<p>Consumer  spending rose 12% in 2006 and matched GDP growth of 8% in 2007. With a current  account surplus of $74 billion in 2007, foreign exchange reserves of $470  billion and ever-escalating oil prices, Russia&#8217;s ruble has been strong, making  imports super cheap. Given the lack of high quality goods in Russian stores  before 1991, and the impoverishment of the country in the 1990s, this consumer  boom is not surprising. But it does mean that there are finally investment  opportunities in Russia outside the energy sector, in places where the Russian  government&#8217;s heavy hand is less evident.</p>
<p>  As long  as global oil prices remain high, or continue increasing as they have in the  past five years, Russian energy companies will make record profits and Russian  consumers will enjoy a bonanza, producing profits in consumer sectors also.  Once energy prices turn around, Russia is in trouble. However, there is no sign  of that yet, and at least in the short term, there&#8217;s money to be made from the  continued advance in energy prices.</p>
<p>Politically, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/may/08/russia1">it&#8217;s unclear how  much of a difference Medvedev will make</a>, since, after all, Putin will now  serve as prime minister (<a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article3882798.ece">one  news report described Medvedev as the &quot;puppet president&quot;</a> of Putin&#8217;s).</p>
<p>To be  sure, as the former CEO of <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=RTD%3AGAZP">Gazprom OAO</a> (OTC: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=OTC%3AOGZPY">OGZPY</a>), Medvedev has  at least a basic knowledge of how business works. And it&#8217;s likely that he&#8217;ll  continue to follow Russia&#8217;s current &quot;mixed economy&quot; policy, meaning that  &quot;strategic&quot; sectors will remain government playthings, while non-strategic  sectors such as consumer goods are pretty much left to operate freely &#8211; and unharmed.  Russia even intends to use its version of a &quot;sovereign wealth fund&quot; <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/02/21/as-sovereign-wealth-funds-flourish-russia-looks-to-change-the-playing-field/">to  go on a bit of a global buying spree</a>, although it remains to be seen just  how aggressive it will be.</p>
<p>Presumably,  if Putin had wanted to restore full Soviet Communism he would have chosen  someone else; that at least is a consolation.</p>
<h3>Cashing in on Russian Capitalism</h3>
<p>Does  this leave any real plays for U.S. investors? It does, but you must keep in  mind that this is a highly speculative market, and that you should be ready to  sell if U.S. interest rates are increased. The reason: An upward increase in  U.S. interest rates could cause a reversal in energy and commodity prices,  which would have a major impact on the Russian economic advance. Here are a few  Russian profit plays to consider:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>OAO Gazprom (OTC: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=OTC%3AOGZPY">OGZPY</a>): This is       one of the obvious Russian plays, the state-owned natural gas monopoly       with ambitions to control Western Europe&#8217;s gas supplies. Since its       ambitions don&#8217;t yet extend to the U.S. market, it is quoted only on the       Pink Sheets. It has a Price/Earnings ratio of 12, based on trailing       earnings, but gas prices and Gazprom&#8217;s dominance are both rising.
</li>
<li>Lukoil (OTC: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=LUKOY.PK&amp;hl=en">LUKOY</a>):       The other obvious Russian heavyweight, Lukoil is the largest       state-controlled oil company; again, the firm doesn&#8217;t care if you buy the       stock, meaning it also is only available through the Pink Sheets. This one       has a trailing P/E ratio of only 8, and that was based on 2007 earnings       when oil prices for the year averaged $80. A good speculative play on a       further run-up in oil prices.</li>
</ul>
<p>Moving  outside the oil sector, there are two mobile telephone companies you might look  at:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Vimpel-Communications (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AVIP">VIP</a>): This       company has 55 million subscribers and mobile operations in Russia,       Kazakhstan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Georgia and Armenia. Right       now, it trades at 22 times trailing earnings, but only 13 times forward       earnings. It does pay a dividend, but the yield is only 0.9%. I slightly prefer       its collection of non-Russian operations to those of MBT (the Russian       operator we&#8217;ll get to in a moment) &#8211; you especially want Kazakhstan, which       is oil-rich.
</li>
<li>Mobile TeleSystems OJSC (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=MBT&amp;hl=en">MBT</a>): This       mobile operator has 73 million subscribers and operations in Russia,       Ukraine, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan. It is cheaper than Vimpelcom,       trading at only 14 times trailing earnings and 12 times forward earnings,       and it has a dividend yield of 2.5%.
</li>
<li>Finally, for a flyer on       Russia&#8217;s consumer-oriented agribusiness, albeit an expensive one, you       might look at Wimm-Bill-Dann Foods OJSC (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AWBD">WBD</a>), which       manufactures and sells branded dairy, juice, water and baby-foods products       in the Russian market. The shares trade at a pricey 37 times trailing       earnings, and the forward P/E of 21 isn&#8217;t much of an improvement. The       dividend yield is tiny at 0.1%. However, earnings are racing forward as       the Russian consumer market opens up to quality branded goods.</li>
</ul>
<p>Don&#8217;t  put your retirement savings in the Russian market &#8211; Vladimir Putin might get  tempted! However, for a modest oil-related flutter, Russia is well worth a  look.</p>
<p><strong><u>News  and Related Story Links:</u></strong></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>The       Times Online:</strong><br />
  <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article3882798.ece">&quot;Puppet President&quot; Dmitri Medvedev takes  power in Putin job swap</a>.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Guardian.com.uk</strong>: <br />
  <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/may/08/russia1">Putin sworn in as PM  &#8211; and Russia&#8217;s real ruler</a>.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Time</strong>: <br />
  <a href="http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/personoftheyear/article/0,28804,1690753_1690757_1690766,00.html">A  Tsar is Born: Person of the Year 2007</a><strong>.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Money Morning</strong>: <br />
  <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/08/bp-caving-to-kremlin-pressure-over-joint-venture/">BP  Caving to Kremlin Pressure Over Joint Venture</a>.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Money       Morning: <br />
  </strong><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2007/09/19/the-new-%e2%80%9ccold%e2%80%9d-war-how-russia-has-turned-its-energy-exports-into-weapons-of-diplomacy/" title="Permanent Link to The New Cold War: How Russia Has Turned Its Energy Exports Into Weapons of Dipl ">The  New Cold War: How Russia Has Turned Its Energy Exports Into Weapons of  Diplomacy</a>.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Money       Morning</strong>: <br />
  <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/02/21/as-sovereign-wealth-funds-flourish-russia-looks-to-change-the-playing-field/">As  Sovereign Wealth Funds Flourish, Russia Looks to Change the Playing Field</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p></body><br />
</html></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/09/with-the-new-russian-president-vowing-to-steer-a-steady-ship-us-investors-can-look-to-profit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
