<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Investment News: Money Morning &#187; Treasuries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moneymorning.com/category/treasuries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moneymorning.com</link>
	<description>Investment News Provider</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:52:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Treasuries May be no Safe Haven in This Stock Market Storm</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/02/28/treasuries-may-be-no-safe-haven-in-this-stock-market-storm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/02/28/treasuries-may-be-no-safe-haven-in-this-stock-market-storm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Hutchinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Essay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Hutchinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasuries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/02/28/treasuries-may-be-no-safe-haven-in-this-stock-market-storm/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Martin Hutchinson
  Contributing Editor
  

For the last couple of years, every time problems have  emerged in the stock market, investors have rushed into U.S. Treasury Bonds,  assuming they&#8217;re a catchall &#34;safe haven&#34; against stock-market storms.
But there are signs that at least long-term Treasuries may  no longer provide that safe [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>By Martin Hutchinson<br />
  Contributing Editor
  </p>
<p></strong></p>
<p>For the last couple of years, every time problems have  emerged in the stock market, investors have rushed into U.S. Treasury Bonds,  assuming they&#8217;re a catchall &quot;safe haven&quot; against stock-market storms.</p>
<p>But there are signs that at least long-term Treasuries may  no longer provide that safe haven &#8211; and actually may pose the danger of  substantial capital losses.</p>
<p>The reason for this is very simple: The financial markets  think inflation is on the way back.</p>
<p>Earlier this week, <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/02/26/two-ways-to-cash-in-on-the-commodity-craze/">I  detailed the problems faced by the Korean steel manufacturing company Posco</a> (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=pkx&#038;hl=en&#038;meta=hl%3Den">PKX</a>)  when the cost of iron ore, its principal raw material, suddenly rose 65%. That  problem is repeated throughout the economy. For example, winter wheat prices  have risen 90% in the last 6 weeks. That can&#8217;t help but have a damaging impact.  Just look at bread producers. These companies are used to dealing with  fluctuations in wheat prices, and averaging out the profits with the losses,  but they can&#8217;t average out a fluctuation of that size. Consequently, bread  prices too will have to rise. </p>
<p>This is no longer a matter of just one commodity, oil, being  forced up in price due to special factors; commodity prices in many different  market sectors are rising in many different geographic markets &#8211; and all at the  same time.</p>
<p>No amount of fudging and looking at only &quot;core&quot; inflation is  going to be able to disguise this very painful reality: Inflation is on its way  back &#8211; with a vengeance &#8211; and will be very difficult to get rid of again.</p>
<p>Until recently, U.S. Treasuries were ignoring this  possibility. The collapse of the subprime-mortgage market, and the resultant  difficulties suffered in the banking sector, had caused investors to seek  safety, driving Treasury bond yields down very close to their lows of 2003, a  time when the short-term Federal Funds rate was only 1% and people were worried  about deflation &#8211; negative inflation.</p>
<p>By late January, the 10-year Treasury bond rate was yielding  only 3.28%.</p>
<p>That has certainly changed. In just one month, that 10-year  Treasury bond yield rose from 3.28% to 3.90%, giving holders of 10-year T-bonds  a capital loss of about 6% of their principal. The yield was 3.85% yesterday.</p>
<p>Clearly, Treasuries are no longer a safe haven.</p>
<p>The U.S. Federal Reserve and the Bush administration would  like them to remain in that role.</p>
<p>However, this federal-level duo isn&#8217;t going about it in the  right way. The Fed has cut short-term interest rates from 5.25% to 3% in the  last 6 months &#8211; that&#8217;s why commodity prices have suddenly put on a new spurt,  with oil soaring from less than $70 a barrel to around $100. That raises the  likelihood of inflation. In the short term, lowering short-term rates may lower  Treasury bond yields and help the bond market; in the long term, it is likely  to have the opposite effect.</p>
<p>As we&#8217;ve seen before, once inflation gets a grip, it is very  difficult to shake. At some point, the Fed will have to increase its interest  rates and whichever administration is in power will have to cut the federal  budget deficit. Since it&#8217;s unlikely that politicians or the Fed will recognize  this unpleasant necessity voluntarily, they will have to be forced into it. The  way they get forced is through the Treasury market: prices drop sharply and the  regular Treasury bond auctions suddenly find no subscribers, except at the  short end.</p>
<p>When that eventuality arises, you don&#8217;t want to be owning  long-term Treasuries. If your investment is only yielding 3%-plus, a capital  loss of 6% is substantial &#8211; the equivalent of about 2 years&#8217; income. If long-term  interest rates were to rise to even 5.2% &#8212; a level they touched as recently as  2006 &#8211; you would lose another 12% on your money.</p>
<p>You can do a little better by buying <a href="http://www.treasurydirect.gov/indiv/products/prod_tips_glance.htm">Treasury  Inflation Protected Securities</a> (TIPS), the principal and interest of which  are linked to the Consumer Price Index (CPI). The trouble is, the income on  those things is less than 2%. What&#8217;s more, the CPI has been fiddled with and  really isn&#8217;t an honest measure of inflation [Please tell me that you didn't  REALLY believe inflation was still below 4%?].</p>
<p>The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics subtracts a &quot;hedonic&quot;  factor to take account of improvements in quality in the high-tech sector.  However, the BLS calculates that factor by reference to processor speed,  pretending that today&#8217;s computers are 1,000 times better than those of 1998  because the processor speed is 1,000 times as fast. As anyone who has used a  computer for the last 10 years knows, they may be twice as useful, or even four  times as useful, but not 1,000 times.</p>
<p>So the official CPI vastly understates inflation, meaning  that your real return of just under 2% is actually even less than that, when  calculated against true inflation. The difference is about 0.8% per annum; you  can calculate that by comparing U.S. TIPS with British Index-Linked Gilts,  where the price index hasn&#8217;t been fiddled with: The British bonds yield about  0.8% less.</p>
<p>To profit from increases in Treasury bond yields, you might  consider the Rydex Juno Fund (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=RYJCX&#038;hl=en">RYJCX</a>), the  price of which is inversely linked to T-bond prices [the fund shorts Treasury  bond futures]. The fund has had a poor record since its inception in 2001, but  should be due to do a lot better now.</p>
<p><strong><u>News  and Related Story Links:</u></strong></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Money       Morning Investment Analysis</strong>: <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/02/26/two-ways-to-cash-in-on-the-commodity-craze/">Two       Ways to Cash in on the Commodity Craze</a>.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/02/28/treasuries-may-be-no-safe-haven-in-this-stock-market-storm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
