<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Investment News: Money Morning &#187; Spin-offs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moneymorning.com/category/spin-offs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moneymorning.com</link>
	<description>Investment News Provider</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:52:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Outperform the Market with Spin-offs</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/16/outperform-the-market-with-spin-offs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/16/outperform-the-market-with-spin-offs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spin-offs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/16/outperform-the-market-with-spin-offs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Jennifer Yousfi
    Managing Editor
In the world of  investing, sometimes the separate parts are worth more than the whole.
Those parts are  called &#34;corporate spin-offs,&#34; and as far as investment plays go, they can be one  of the safest and most-profitable hands that investors can play &#8211; especially  against [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>By Jennifer Yousfi</strong><br />
    <strong>Managing Editor</strong></p>
<p>In the world of  investing, sometimes the separate parts are worth more than the whole.</p>
<p>Those parts are  called &quot;corporate spin-offs,&quot; and as far as investment plays go, they can be one  of the safest and most-profitable hands that investors can play &#8211; especially  against a market backdrop as uncertain as the one we face now.</p>
<p>&quot;In general,  spin-offs let the markets more accurately value the operations separately,&quot;  says Louis Basenese, editor of <strong><em>The Takeover Trader</em></strong>. &quot;So it&#8217;s  important to know the parent companies&#8217; motivation. Are they divesting  underperforming assets to revive the parent stock, or breaking out quickly  growing operations being held back? In my experience, if you stick to spin-offs  of the latter, you&#8217;ll be handsomely rewarded.&quot;</p>
<p>There are many reasons a corporate parent might decide to  spin-off a subsidiary. And as Basenese said, the parent&#8217;s motivations are key  to making good investment picks. Here are some examples of investor-friendly  reasons for a spin-off:</p>
<ul>
<li>Streamlining or consolidating business  operations.</li>
<li>Tying management performance more closely to the  subsidiary&#8217;s performance.</li>
<li>Freeing a subsidiary that is being held back by  the parent corporation&#8217;s regulatory environment or other factors.</li>
</ul>
<p>There have been numerous studies done on how spin-offs tend  to outperform the market as well, if not better, than their former corporate  parents. According to a study titled &quot;Restructuring Through Spinoffs,&quot;  published in 1993 by Penn State University, spin-off companies outperformed  peers and the S&amp;P 500 Index by approximately 10% per year in the first  three years after the initial spin-off. </p>
<p><b>Story continues below&#8230;</b></p>
<table align="center" style="background:#E0E7C2">
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Sign up right now, and we&#8217;ll send you an important new report for free: &#8220;The Three Best Investments in Asia.&#8221;</font></strong>
				</p>
<form method="post" action="http://www.aweber.com/scripts/addlead.pl">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_web_form_id" value="163867">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_split_id" value="">
<input type="hidden" name="unit" value="money-morning">
<input type="hidden" name="redirect" value="http://www.oxfonline.com/MMR/ROG0108mm.html?pub=MMR&#038;code=WMMRJ405">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_redirect_onlist" value="">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_adtracking" value="X300HJG4">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_message" value="1">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_required" value="from">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_forward_vars" value="0">
<form method="post" action="http://www.aweber.com/scripts/addlead.pl">
            <center> <img src="http://www.moneymorning.com/images2/MMSignUp.gif" /><br />
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><br />
      </font> </p>
<input type="submit" name="submit" value="Subscribe Now!" onClick="var s=s_gi(s_account); s.linkTrackVars='eVar2,eVar10,events'; s.linkTrackEvents='event3'; s.events='event3'; s.eVar10 ='Spin Off'; s.tl(this,'o','Subscribe to Newsletter');" />
<input type="text" name="from" value="" size="20" />
</center><br />
</form>
<p></font></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>The study, which looked at 25 years of market history, also  found that parent companies outperformed peers by more than 6% the year after  the spin-off.</p>
<p>A 1999 McKinsey study of 168 corporate restructurings showed  that spin-offs substantially outperformed the market. The McKinsey study of  companies spun off between 1988 and 1998 showed that the new firms had a  two-year annualized total return to shareholders of 27%, versus 14% for the  Russell 2000 and 17% for the S&amp;P 500. </p>
<p>  Spin-offs tend to outperform because investors often sell when they  receive stock in a new company they never intended to own, keeping share prices  low initially. Also, index fund managers sell off spin-off shares if the new  company is not added to the original parent company&#8217;s index. Institutional fund  managers will also sell spin-off shares due to lack of liquidity or dividend. </p>
<p>At the same time, management&#8217;s performance will have a  greater impact on the shares of the spin-off than it had on the parent company,  often spurring greater efforts to innovate and succeed.</p>
<h3>A Spin-Off that  Streamlines</h3>
<p>  If someone asked: What fast-food company is the world leader in terms of  total restaurant locations? Most people would probably guess McDonald&#8217;s Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AMCD">MCD</a>), but the correct  answer is fast-food rival Yum! Brands Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=yum">YUM</a>), with 34,000 locations.</p>
<p>  Yum is the proprietor of such well-known brands as KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco  Bell, Long John Silver&#8217;s and A&amp;W All-American Food Restaurants. Yum also  has East Dawning, an Asian-markets chain operated by its Yum! Restaurants  International (YRI) division.</p>
<p>  The former PepsiCo. Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=pep">PEP</a>)  subsidiary was spun-off in 1997 under the name Tricon Global, which was later  changed to Yum in 2002. In the words  of one PepsiCo executive, &quot;restaurants weren&#8217;t our schtick,&quot; <strong><em><a href="http://www.economist.com/business/displaystory.cfm?story_id=4316138">The  Economist reported</a></em></strong>.  &nbsp;</p>
<p>  Freed from the beverage giant corporate parent, President and CEO <a href="http://stocks.us.reuters.com/stocks/OfficersDirectorsDetails.asp?rpc=66&#038;symbol=YUM&#038;officerID=19924">David  C. Novak</a> was able to develop economies of scale across Yum&#8217;s various  restaurant brands. Prior to the spin-off, the chains had acted more like  competitors. But Novak was able to unify the various lines and put their  combined purchasing power to work to score better terms from suppliers.</p>
<p>  Novak also centralized advertising for the chains. Dual locations, where  products from two chains were offered at the same location, were opened. Such  innovation helped push Yum to the top the fast food industry and have allowed  Yum shares to increase almost 400% from its 1997 spin-off.</p>
<p>  That growth has been due in large part to a successful overseas strategy.  Yum has done exceptionally well in China, where most consumers think of KFC  when they think of chicken. And now the company is planning to expand further  into India, another emerging market with a rapidly growing middle class.</p>
<p>  Yum plans to open several Taco Bell locations in India in the latter half of  2008. India&#8217;s <em><strong><a href="http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/News/News_By_Industry/Services/Hotels__Restaurants/Yum_Taco_Bell_to_tickle_Indian_taste_buds/articleshow/2810542.cms">Economic  Times reported</a></strong></em> that Yum, which already has KFC and Pizza Hut  locations in India, plans to double its revenues from India in the next three  years, with most of this growth coming from Taco Bell. </p>
<p>  Yum also has been pushing to increase domestic sales by revamping U.S. menus,  increasing breakfast options, and reducing company ownership through a  re-franchising program of its KFC and Pizza Hut brands, <a href="http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/02/25/ap4693103.html">The <strong><em>Associated  Press</em></strong> reported</a>. And it looks like that hard work is starting  to pay off.</p>
<p>  UBS AG (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=UBS">UBS</a>) recently  upgraded Yum shares to a &quot;Buy&quot; from &quot;Neutral.&quot; In a note to clients, analyst  David Palmer said &quot;while some investors have expressed concerns that the U.S.  re-franchising appeared to slow versus company guidance in 2007, we expect to  see that trend reverse in 2008 and 2009.&quot;</p>
<p>  &quot;We believe the end result for Yum will be a faster-growing,  more-international, higher-return company by 2010 &#8211; with 40% or more of its  enterprise value coming from its rapidly growing China business,&quot; Palmer added.</p>
<p>  Yum shares have traded between $28.37 and $40.60 in the past 52 weeks.  Yesterday (Tuesday), shares closed at $38.06.</p>
<h3>A Spin-Off that  Gives Back</h3>
<p>  Tech conglomerate EMC Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AEMC">EMC</a>) first acquired  VMware, Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AVMW">VMW</a>)  in 2004. In three short years, the virtualization  solutions subsidiary  grew from 300 employees to 3,000. In 2007, EMC decided to take VMware public.</p>
<p>  EMC management saw the initial public offering of VMWare  shares as a way to reward shareholders and employees alike.</p>
<p>  The offering will &quot;unlock more of VMware&#8217;s value for EMC  shareholders,&quot; and help the company &quot;retain and attract the software industry&#8217;s  top talent,&quot; EMC Chairman, President, and CEO Joe Tucci said in a statement, <strong><em><a href="http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/02/08/HNemcspinoffvmware_1.html">InfoWorld reported</a></em></strong>. </p>
<p>  The proceeds of the new share sale will &quot;provide VMware with  the financial resources it needs to achieve its full growth potential and  provide EMC with the potential to return a portion of the original investment  in VMware to EMC shareholders, while enabling them to continue to enjoy the  vast majority ownership in this strategic and fast-growing business,&quot; David  Goulden, executive vice president and chief financial officer of EMC, said at  the time.</p>
<p>Shares of VMware were initially priced at  $29 per share and publicly listed on August 16, 2007. The stock rocketed to a  high of $125.25 in October, but since then have lost nearly two-thirds of their  value and are currently trading at $51.72 as of the close yesterday.</p>
<p>A sluggish U.S. economy has certainly taken its toll on this  tech stock, but brighter days could be on the horizon.</p>
<p>Earlier this month, Wachovia Securities (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=wb">WB</a>) analyst Philip Rueppel  upgraded VMware to &quot;Outperform&quot; from &quot;Market Perform,&quot; <a href="http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/04/01/ap4841579.html">the <strong><em>Associated  Press</em></strong> reported</a>. He also raised his earnings and revenue estimates  for the company&#8217;s first quarter. In a note to clients, Reuppel called the  recent pullback in VMware shares &quot;overdone.&quot;</p>
<p>&quot;Recent concerns have led to a steep decline in VMware  shares, but we believe near-, medium-, and long-term fundamental drivers remain  robust,&quot; Rueppel wrote. &quot;In the long term, we feel VMware shares do not fully  reflect the potential from incremental product platforms which leverage  long-term industry trends, such as desktop virtualization.&quot;</p>
<p>This is a two-for-one bit of good news. A rosy outlook for  VMware means good news for EMC as well, as the primary stakeholder, EMC still  holds 86% of VMware stock. </p>
<h3>A Spin-Off that Liberates</h3>
<p>Philip Morris International Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=pm">PM</a>) is the latest Altria  Group Inc. (MO) spin-off as part of Altria&#8217;s continuing restructuring process.  Altria divested its remaining interest in Kraft Foods Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AKFT">KFT</a>) to shareholders  late last year.</p>
<p>On March 28, one share of Philip Morris stock was issued to  every Altria shareholder of record as of March 19. Altria distributed 100% of  shares and no longer holds a stake in PMI. </p>
<p>The spin-off will free Philip Morris from the strict tobacco  regulatory environment and decline in smoking population of the United States  and allow it to focus on overseas operations, where sales are still climbing.</p>
<p>As part of the spin-off, the new firm was also able to close  its New York headquarters, which is estimated to save $250 million in overhead  annually, former Altria and new Philip Morris Chief Executive Officer Louis C. Camilleri  said on a conference call, <strong><em><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20494757/">MSNBC reported</a></em></strong>. The  new firm&#8217;s headquarters will be in Lausanne, Switzerland where it can better oversee  its international operations in 160 different countries.</p>
<p>Shares of Philip Morris International opened at $52.40 on March 31 and  since then have dropped 8% to close at $48.20 yesterday. </p>
<p>But Morgan Stanley (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=ms">MS</a>) analyst David Adelman  believes the spin-off is a good long-term strategy.</p>
<p>&quot;There is little evidence that the [previously] existing  holding company structure added real operational value (whereas it  unequivocally adds cost),&quot; Adelman told investors in a research report.</p>
<p><strong><u>News and Related Story Links:</u></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>The Economist:</strong><br />
  <a href="http://www.economist.com/business/displaystory.cfm?story_id=4316138">Fast  food&#8217;s yummy secret</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>InfoWorld:</strong><br />
  <a href="http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/02/08/HNemcspinoffvmware_1.html">EMC  to spin off part of VMware in IPO</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Forbes:</strong><br />
  <a href="http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/04/01/ap4841579.html">VMware Rebounds  After Upgrade</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>MSNBC.com:</strong><br />
  <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20494757/">Altria to spin off  Philip Morris International</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>BusinessWeek:</strong><br />
  <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/investor/content/nov2005/pi2005113_4372_pi015.htm">Spin  Off, Buy Up, Cash In</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/16/outperform-the-market-with-spin-offs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
