<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Investment News: Money Morning &#187; Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moneymorning.com/category/media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moneymorning.com</link>
	<description>Investment News Provider</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:52:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Sirius-XM Merger: Should Investors Buy?</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/03/25/sirius-xm-merger-approved-by-doj-should-investors-buy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/03/25/sirius-xm-merger-approved-by-doj-should-investors-buy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 22:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Caggeso</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Caggeso]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/03/25/sirius-xm-merger-approved-by-doj-should-investors-buy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Mike Caggeso 
    Associate Editor 
Minutes after the Dept. of Justice approved Sirius Satellite  Radio Inc.&#8217;s (SIRI)  merger with XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. (XMSR), each  company&#8217;s shares soared by double-digits&#8230; 
Yet, until the merger is completed, it&#8217;s hard to know  whether that sharp jump will continue&#8230; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>By Mike Caggeso </strong><br />
    <strong>Associate Editor </strong></p>
<p>Minutes after the Dept. of Justice approved Sirius Satellite  Radio Inc.&#8217;s (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ:SIRI">SIRI</a>)  merger with XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AXMSR">XMSR</a>), each  company&#8217;s shares soared by double-digits&hellip; </p>
<p>Yet, until the merger is completed, it&#8217;s hard to know  whether that sharp jump will continue&hellip; whether now is a time to jump in with  both feet&hellip; or whether the surge will cool on the heels of valuations soon-to-be  posted by analysts, who no doubt are bleary-eyed and caffeine-drunk from  crunching the numbers through the night. </p>
<p>So the question is, should you buy?</p>
<p>The answer is not an easy one. It depends on three factors.</p>
<p>To begin with, the merger &#8211; which was first proposed in  November 2007 &#8211; still has to pass through the Federal Communications  Commission, which could impose conditions that alter the agreement and/or favor  the groups that lobbied heavily against it.</p>
<p><b>Story continues below&#8230;</b></p>
<table align="center" style="background:#E0E7C2">
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Sign up right now, and we&#8217;ll send you an important new report for free: &#8220;The Three Best Investments in Asia.&#8221;</font></strong>
				</p>
<form method="post" action="http://www.aweber.com/scripts/addlead.pl">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_web_form_id" value="163867">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_split_id" value="">
<input type="hidden" name="unit" value="money-morning">
<input type="hidden" name="redirect" value="http://www.moneymorning.com/confirmsiup/">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_redirect_onlist" value="">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_adtracking" value="X300HJG4">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_message" value="1">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_required" value="from">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_forward_vars" value="0">
<form method="post" action="http://www.aweber.com/scripts/addlead.pl">
            <center> <img src="http://www.moneymorning.com/images2/MMSignUp.gif" /><br />
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><br />
      </font> </p>
<input type="submit" name="submit" value="Submit" />
<input type="text" name="from" value="" size="20" />
</center><br />
</form>
<p></font></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>The FCC is expected to rule within the next few weeks. April  Horace, an analyst with Janco Partners who has been following Sirius, said the  FCC shouldn&#8217;t take too long to ponder. </p>
<p>&quot;It&#8217;s not like this hasn&#8217;t been sitting on the FCC&#8217;s plate.  It&#8217;s been there for a year,&quot; Horace said.&nbsp;&nbsp; </p>
<p>In its ruling, the Dept. of Justice said that a Sirius/XM  merger would not violate anti-trust laws because the satellite radio providers  face competition from AM and FM broadcasters, television, mobile phones and  online music stores and radio stations. </p>
<p>Secondly, the merger still faces tough opposition from one  of the most powerful lobbies in the world. Many of Sirius and XM&#8217;s competitors  are part of the National Association of Broadcasters, one of the merger&#8217;s most  prominent opponents. And looking at its executive committee &#8211; which includes  senior managers from billion-dollar media titans such as Hearst-Argyle  Television Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=htv&#038;hl=en">HTV</a>),  Gannett Co. Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AGCI">GCI</a>)  and Belo Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABLC">BLC</a>)  &#8211; it&#8217;s no wonder the DOJ investigation took so long.&nbsp; </p>
<p>&quot;We are astonished that the Justice Department would propose  granting a monopoly to two companies that systematically broke FCC rules for  more than a decade. To hinge approval of this monopoly on XM and Sirius&#8217;s  refusal to deliver on a promise of interoperable radios is nothing short of  breathtaking,&quot; The National Association of Broadcasters <a href="http://www.nab.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Press_Releases1&#038;CONTENTID=11934&#038;TEMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm">said  in a statement</a>.</p>
<p>Third, will this merger give the combined companies the  leverage they need to reduce operating costs and increase profit?</p>
<p>The merger would likely combine XM and Sirius&#8217; content  together for a lower price. Subscribers of both now pay $12.95 a month, but may  pay as little as $6.99 with the proposed tiered pricing, <strong><em>Bloomberg </em></strong>reported.&nbsp;&nbsp; </p>
<p>Sirius has 7.67 million subscribers who have access to  premium content that includes talent such as Howard Stern and NASCAR  broadcasts. While XM&#8217;s 8.57 million listeners pay a premium for content from  Oprah Winfrey, Major League Baseball and in-studio artist performances. </p>
<p>To fund such content and compete with each other, both  Sirius and XM spend [and lose] hundreds of millions of dollars a year. </p>
<p>Together, they can combine their best programming and  management and form a music and news medium better equipped to fight against  billion-dollar competitors such as Clear Channel Communications, Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ACCU">CCU</a>) and Apple Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AAAPL">APPL</a>). </p>
<h3><strong>Should you buy?</strong></h3>
<p>The cons outweigh the pros, said Lou Basenese, an M&amp;A  expert and editor of investment newsletters <strong><em>The Hot IPO Trader</em></strong> and <strong><em>The Takeover Trader</em></strong>. </p>
<p>&quot;Don&#8217;t buy either stock, even if they finally  get FCC clearance. Ultimately, share prices follow earnings. And neither of  these companies have any. Combining won&#8217;t change that fact,&quot; said Basenese, who  has been following the Sirius/XM merger from the beginning. </p>
<p>Moreover, while the premium content of each  satellite radio provider is worth its suggested new price, a merger would  combine the debts each station paid to have the likes of Howard and Oprah. </p>
<p>&quot;Both companies overspent to acquire content  in a bid to expand subscribership as fast as possible &#8211; a fatal mistake that  will make sustained profitability (as independent or combined companies)  impossible for years to come,&quot; Basenese said.&nbsp; </p>
<p>XM shares closed at $13.79 yesterday, going up $1.85 for a  15.49% gain. Sirius shares closed at $3.15, up $0.25 for an 8.62% gain. </p>
<p>Shareholders already approved of the merger. More than 96%  of those who voted approved the transaction in separate meetings in November, <strong><em><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&#038;sid=aSqu7.uCDzAk&#038;refer=home">Bloomberg  reported</a></em></strong>.</p>
<p>But again, a large part of the final deal depends on what  stipulations, if any, the FCC lays forth. </p>
<p><strong><u>News and Related Story Links: </u></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Wall Street Journal: </strong><br />
    <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120638514923860085.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">Sirius-XM  Gets Antitrust Approval</a></p>
</li>
<li><strong>National Association of Broadcasting: </strong><br />
    <a href="http://www.nab.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Press_Releases1&#038;CONTENTID=11934&#038;TEMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm">NAB  Statement on Today&#8217;s DOJ Decision Regarding XM and Sirius</a> </p>
</li>
<li><strong>Bloomberg: </strong><br />
    <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&#038;sid=aSqu7.uCDzAk&#038;refer=home">XM  Satellite, Sirius Combination Approved at Justice</a> </li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/03/25/sirius-xm-merger-approved-by-doj-should-investors-buy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two Media Dynasties Converge with Proposed $2.9 Billion Consolidated Buyout</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/01/21/two-media-dynasties-converge-with-proposed-29-billion-consolidated-buyout/</link>
		<comments>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/01/21/two-media-dynasties-converge-with-proposed-29-billion-consolidated-buyout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Caggeso</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buyout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Caggeso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/01/21/two-media-dynasties-converge-with-proposed-29-billion-consolidated-buyout/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By  Mike Caggeso 
    Associate  Editor 
Consolidated  Media Holdings Ltd., Australia&#8217;s second-largest media company, is entertaining  a very generous buyout offer from Lachlan Murdoch, eldest  son of media tycoon Rupert  Murdoch, and James  Packer, Australia&#8217;s richest person and son of late media tycoon Kerry Packer. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>By  Mike Caggeso </strong><br />
    <strong>Associate  Editor</strong> </p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=ASX%3ACMJ">Consolidated  Media Holdings Ltd.</a></strong>, Australia&#8217;s second-largest media company, is entertaining  a very generous buyout offer from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lachlan_Murdoch">Lachlan Murdoch</a>, eldest  son of media tycoon <a href="http://stocks.us.reuters.com/stocks/OfficersDirectorsDetails.asp?rpc=66&#038;symbol=NWSa&#038;officerID=130391">Rupert  Murdoch</a>, and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Packer">James  Packer</a>, Australia&#8217;s richest person and son of late media tycoon <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerry_Packer">Kerry Packer</a>. </p>
<p>The duo offered $2.9 billion to privatize Consolidated  Media, which is 24% higher than the stock&#8217;s last traded price. Packer is the  company&#8217;s executive chairman of the board and owns 38% of the company, <strong><em><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601080&#038;sid=ac833drfhMZI&#038;refer=asia">Bloomberg  reported</a></em></strong>. </p>
<p>Under the deal&#8217;s terms, Murdoch&#8217;s private company&#8217;s Illryia  Pty. Ltd., and co-investors would own 50% of Consolidated Media. Consolidated  Press, the Parker-led investment company, would control the other 50%. Lachlan,  however, would become the company&#8217;s executive chairman. </p>
<p>&quot;It&#8217;s a huge premium to pay but we&#8217;ll pay it because we like  the businesses and I think I can add a lot of value,&quot; Murdoch said in an  interview with <strong><em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120088528274504165.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">The  Wall Street Journal</a></em></strong>. </p>
<p>Consolidated Media has four operational segments: gaming,  television, publishing and ticketing and events. It was formed last year from  Packer&#8217;s former Publishing &amp; Broadcasting unit when he split from his  casino operations, the <strong><em>Journal</em></strong> said. </p>
<p>If Consolidated Media accepts the offer, it will expand the  reach and influence of the famed Murdoch family&#8217;s media dynasty. Lachlan&#8217;s  father is Chairman and CEO of News Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ANWS">NWS</a>), which recently  purchased the Dow Jones &amp; Co., publisher of <strong><em>The Wall Street Journal</em></strong>.  The company&#8217;s assets also include television stations, magazines and newspapers  around the world as well as social networking site, MySpace.</p>
<p>Sensing media outcry, the <strong><em>Journal</em></strong> went out of  its way to say that Murdoch&#8217;s Consolidated bid was independent of News Corp.,  as he quit his management role with the company in 2005, though he still  remains on the company&#8217;s board.</p>
<p>The <strong><em>Journal</em></strong> even noted that the last time the  younger Murdoch and Packer worked together was a failed mobile phone company,  One.Tel Ltd., which lost hundreds of millions of dollars and declared  bankruptcy in 2001. </p>
<p>The deal is subject to board approval then shareholder  approval, as well as approval from Australia&#8217;s securities regulator. </p>
<p><strong><u>News and Related Story Links: </u></strong></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Reuters: </strong><br />
  <a href="http://stocks.us.reuters.com/stocks/OfficersDirectorsDetails.asp?rpc=66&#038;symbol=NWSa&#038;officerID=130391">K.  Rupert Murdoch bio</a></li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Wikipedia:</strong><br />
  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lachlan_Murdoch">Lachlan Murdoch</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Wikipedia:</strong><br />
  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Packer">James Packer</a></li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Wikipedia:</strong><br />
  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerry_Packer">Kerry Packer</a></li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Wall       Street Journal:&nbsp; </strong><br />
  <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120088528274504165.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">Lachlan  Murdoch, James Packer Tie Up for Australian Media Firm</a></li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Bloomberg:</strong><br />
  <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601080&#038;sid=ac833drfhMZI&#038;refer=asia">Lachlan  Murdoch, Packer Offer to Buy Out Consolidated</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/01/21/two-media-dynasties-converge-with-proposed-29-billion-consolidated-buyout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Traditional Media Looks to Cash In On Fast Growing Video Game Industry</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2007/12/05/traditional-media-looks-to-cash-in-on-fast-growing-video-game-industry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.moneymorning.com/2007/12/05/traditional-media-looks-to-cash-in-on-fast-growing-video-game-industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 22:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Games]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/2007/12/05/traditional-media-looks-to-cash-in-on-fast-growing-video-game-industry/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Jennifer Yousfi
  Managing Editor
French media giant Vivendi&#8217;s (BIT:VIV or  PINK:VIVEF) recent deal to buy a major position in U.S.-based Activision,  Inc. (NASDAQ:ATVI) has turned the market&#8217;s eye  to other video game tech stocks.&#160;  Activision&#8217;s stock rose on 24% Monday after the deal was announced, but  other gaming stocks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>By Jennifer Yousfi<br />
  Managing Editor</strong></p>
<p>French media giant Vivendi&#8217;s (BIT:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=BIT%3AVIV">VIV</a> or  PINK:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=PINK%3AVIVEF">VIVEF</a>) recent deal to buy a major position in U.S.-based Activision,  Inc. (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AATVI">ATVI</a>) has turned the market&#8217;s eye  to other video game tech stocks.&nbsp;  Activision&#8217;s stock rose on 24% Monday after the deal was announced, but  other gaming stocks also showed gains as investors bet on potential take-over  targets.</p>
<form method="post" action="http://www.aweber.com/scripts/addlead.pl">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_web_form_id" value="163867">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_split_id" value="">
<input type="hidden" name="unit" value="money-morning">
<input type="hidden" name="redirect" value="http://www.moneymorning.com/confirmsiup/">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_redirect_onlist" value="">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_adtracking" value="X300HACG">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_message" value="1">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_required" value="from">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_forward_vars" value="0">
<table width="450" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><center><br />
  <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>Story Continues Below&#8230; </strong></font><br />
  <img src="http://www.moneymorning.com/images2/MMSignUp.gif" /><br />
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><br />
<strong>Enter Your Email Address Below:</strong></font> </p>
<input type="submit" name="submit" value="Submit" />
<input type="text" name="from" value="" size="20" />
</center>   </td>
</tr>
</table>
</form>
<ul>
<li>Take-Two Interactive Software (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3ATTWO">TTWO</a>), makers of  &quot;Grand Theft Auto,&quot; rose 8.7% to close at $16.28.</li>
<li>THQ  Inc. (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3ATHQI">THQI</a>)  rose 1.8% immediately following the announcement. </li>
<li>And  France-based Ubisoft Entertainment SA (EPA:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=EPA%3AUBI">UBI</a>) rose 5.3%.</li>
</ul>
<p>Two companies  that did not benefit from the announcement were Electronic Arts Inc. (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AERTS">ERTS</a>) and China-based The9 Ltd. (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3ANCTY">NCTY</a>), of which EA currently holds a minority  stake.&nbsp; Both stocks lost in trading on  Monday.</p>
<p>The9 Ltd. has a  licensing agreement in place with Vivendi to distribute &quot;World of Warcraft,&quot;  one of the most popular online role-playing games, in the China market.&nbsp; Investors fear Vivendi&#8217;s new deal with  Activision, a top EA competitor, will threaten this profitable agreement.</p>
<p>Video games are a multibillion-dollar industry and media  conglomerates are looking for ways to capitalize on this fast growing  entertainment sector at a time when traditional media like movies and music are  struggling worldwide.</p>
<p>Revenues from console and online games are expected to  outpace film and music revenues this year.&nbsp;  The video game market is  expected to grow 9% annually over the next several years to become worth $48.9  billion by 2011 as reported by the <b>Economist.com</b>.&nbsp; </p>
<p>&quot;I do believe that consolidation ultimately is  inevitable. Video-game development is not getting any cheaper. It&#8217;s a  capital-intensive business, and I don&#8217;t see that going away. That will drive  some of the smaller competitors out,&quot; Take-Two Interactive Software Chief  Executive Ben Feder told a UBS investment conference on Monday.</p>
<p>Traditional media firms have incentive to buy an established  video game company rather than invest the start-up time and capital needed to  build their own in-house division.</p>
<p>BMO Capital  Markets analyst Edward Williams told <b>Reuters</b> that Chinese and Korean game  companies make appealing prospects to traditional media firms due to their ties  with fast-growing Asian markets and familiarity with profitable online  subscription business models.&nbsp; </p>
<p>&quot;You can&#8217;t ignore  players in Asia,&quot; Williams said.</p>
<p>Companies to watch  include: China-based Shanda Interactive Entertainment Ltd. (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=Shanda+Interactive+Entertainment+Ltd">SNDA</a>) and Giant Interactive Group Inc. (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AGA">GA</a>) and South Korea-based NCsoft Corp. (SEO:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=SEO%3A036570">036570</a>).</p>
<p><strong><u>News and Related Story Links</u></strong><u>:</u></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Market Watch: </strong><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/activision-shares-hit-record-high/story.aspx?guid=%7BBE7C0622%2D812F%2D4B79%2D9E45%2D287E63D11F9B%7D&#038;dist=TQP_Mod_mktwN"><br />
  Activision  hits record high on Vivendi deal</a><u></u></p>
</li>
<li><strong>Reuters:</strong> <br />
  <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=companyNews&#038;storyid=227918+03-Dec-2007+RTRS&#038;WTmodLoc=InvArt-L2-CompanyNews-2">Take-Two  CEO: Video game mergers &quot;inevitable&quot;</a></p>
</li>
<li><strong>Economist.com:</strong> <br />
  <a href="http://www.economist.com/business/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10238617">Video-games  industry: More than a game</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.moneymorning.com/2007/12/05/traditional-media-looks-to-cash-in-on-fast-growing-video-game-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
