<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Investment News: Money Morning &#187; Market Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moneymorning.com/category/market-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moneymorning.com</link>
	<description>Investment News Provider</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:52:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Four Tough Questions to Ask Yourself in a Tough Market</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/07/01/the-four-tough-questions-to-ask-yourself-in-a-tough-market/</link>
		<comments>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/07/01/the-four-tough-questions-to-ask-yourself-in-a-tough-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Fitz-Gerald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Keith Fitz-Gerald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main Essay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/07/01/the-four-tough-questions-to-ask-yourself-in-a-tough-market/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Keith  Fitz-Gerald
  Investment  Director
  Money  Morning/The Money Map Report
For investors  who are used to living large, this has been the year from hell.
The markets are  tanking. Food costs 25% more than it did a year ago. Inflation is on the march  for the first time in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>By Keith  Fitz-Gerald</strong><br />
  <strong>Investment  Director</strong><br />
  <strong>Money  Morning/The Money Map Report</strong></p>
<p>For investors  who are used to living large, this has been the year from hell.</p>
<p>The markets are  tanking. Food costs 25% more than it did a year ago. Inflation is on the march  for the first time in decades. The sky&#8217;s the limit on gasoline after oil prices  have doubled in the year.</p>
<p>No doubt about  it: As far as financial downturns go, this mess is the real deal.</p>
<p>With that in  mind, we&#8217;ve taken the time to provide you with candid answers to four questions  we&#8217;ve been asked time and again. And that&#8217;s not all. We used those questions to  craft a three-step strategy that will give you the returns you seek, without  forcing you to &quot;bet the ranch.&quot;</p>
<p><strong>Q: How Bad  Are Things Right Now?</strong></p>
<p>A: Let&#8217;s not  mince words, here &#8211; they&#8217;re bad. Our take is that this is the worst financial  crisis since the Great Depression. Folks should not be the least bit surprised  by last week&#8217;s horrendous drop-off, nor should they be surprised to learn that  the <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=983582">Dow Jones Industrial  Average</a> has endured its worst June since 1930.</p>
<p>The sad thing is  that it didn&#8217;t have to be this way. </p>
<p>For nearly 20  years, the U.S. Federal Reserve under former Chairman Alan Greenspan flooded  the markets with cheap money and easy credit that encouraged individuals and  institutions alike to take hugely imprudent risks with their money. The Fed  should have opted to &quot;stand pat&quot; and allowed the greenback to strengthen;  instead, it created all that cheap money and allowed the dollar to sink to  Third World debtor status.</p>
<p>Unfortunately,  it doesn&#8217;t look like current Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke is going to &quot;get with  the program&quot; and see the light anytime soon.</p>
<p><strong>Q: How Bad  Could It Get?</strong></p>
<p>A: Our  proprietary technical analysis suggests that we could actually see the <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=626307">Standard &amp; Poor&#8217;s 500  Index</a> trading at half of its 2007 peak of 1,576.09, which would send the  broad index all the way down to a sickening 788.04 before this is all done.</p>
<p>While this is <u>possible</u>,  we&#8217;re not saying that it&#8217;s necessarily <u>probable</u>. That&#8217;s actually an  entirely different question and could well be determined by one key issue: How  quickly and how thoroughly the banks and financial institutions &quot;de-leverage.&quot;</p>
<p>If banks &quot;came  clean&quot; all at once, the markets would probably take a quick hit. As history  shows us &#8211; quite clearly &#8211; the financial markets can digest bad news remarkably  well, and tend to spring back very quickly.</p>
<p>Unfortunately,  by intervening so aggressively and so frequently, the central bank has kept the  markets from functioning effectively. Indeed, all the Bernanke-led Fed has done  is to postpone the inevitable.</p>
<p>Team Bernanke  also is sending the wrong message &#8211; telling financiers that it&#8217;s somehow OK to  keep hiding as much bad debt as possible for as long as possible because Uncle  Sam will come riding to the rescue.</p>
<p>This is a  complete perversion of the Federal Reserve Act, which was created &quot;to increase  production, so as to promote effectively the goals of maximum employment,  stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates.&quot;</p>
<p>And, as  investment guru <a href="http://www.oxfonline.com/MMR/ROG0108mm.html?pub=MMR&#038;code=WMMRJ404">Jim  Rogers</a> pointed out <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/08/exclusive-interview-investment-guru-jim-rogers-predicts-more-pain-for-the-greenback-and-the-failure-of-the-federal-reserve/">when  I interviewed him at his home in Singapore earlier this year</a>: &quot;Nowhere does  [the Act] say that the Fed is supposed to bail out investment banks. It&#8217;s  absurd.&quot;</p>
<p>Unfortunately,  no matter how absurd this seems, the bottom line is that it&#8217;s really happening  &#8211; and that means we must face the problem head on and deal with it. To deal  with it effectively, however, you have to know precisely what you&#8217;re dealing  with. So, let&#8217;s take a look at some key questions you should be asking.</p>
<p><b>Story continues below&#8230;</b></p>
<table align="center" style="background:#E0E7C2">
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Sign up right now, and we&#8217;ll send you an important new report for free: &#8220;The Three Best Investments in Asia.&#8221;</font></strong>
				</p>
<form method="post" action="http://www.aweber.com/scripts/addlead.pl">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_web_form_id" value="163867">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_split_id" value="">
<input type="hidden" name="unit" value="money-morning">
<input type="hidden" name="redirect" value="http://www.moneymorning.com/confirmsiup">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_redirect_onlist" value="">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_adtracking" value="X300HJG4">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_message" value="1">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_required" value="from">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_forward_vars" value="0">
<form method="post" action="http://www.aweber.com/scripts/addlead.pl">
            <center> <img src="http://www.moneymorning.com/images2/MMSignUp.gif" /><br />
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><br />
      </font> </p>
<input type="submit" name="submit" value="Subscribe Now!" onClick="var s=s_gi(s_account); s.linkTrackVars='eVar2,eVar10,events'; s.linkTrackEvents='event3'; s.events='event3'; s.eVar10 ='71'; s.tl(this,'o','Subscribe to Newsletter');" />
<input type="text" name="from" value="" size="20" />
</center><br />
</form>
<p></font></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><strong>Q: How Will  It Affect Me?</strong></p>
<p>A: There&#8217;s obviously  going to be a financial effect. Not only are the markets likely to remain  unsettled until the de-leveraging is complete, but the Fed&#8217;s reckless  liquidity-pumping scheme will result in serious inflationary pressure well  beyond what we&#8217;re already feeling. </p>
<p>As disheartening  as that is to accept, the real challenge we&#8217;ll face as investors will come from  the person we gaze upon in the mirror each morning.</p>
<p>The reason is  that we tend to default to our most basic and counter-productive instincts when  the markets get rocky. We allow irrational fears to take hold. Then we let  those fears take over. The result: We begin making bad decisions that all too  often induce us to join the rest of the investment <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lemming">lemmings</a> and run right off the  cliff.</p>
<p>Next time you  find yourself in such a predicament, take a moment to step aside, take a deep  breath and really evaluate your situation. You have many more options than you  might initially believe.</p>
<p><strong>Q: Is There  Any Good News?</strong></p>
<p>A: Absolutely.  As history teaches us, the lowest returns come to those who buy near, or at,  market peaks &#8211; like those of 1928, 1969, 1999 and 2007.</p>
<p>Profits are  usually a byproduct of courage &#8211; or, at the very least, a belief in proven  strategies. That&#8217;s why the biggest investment returns come to those who invest  when the days are darkest: Think 1932, 1942, 1982 and 2003 &#8211; when the world  looks like it&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/To_hell_in_a_handbasket">going  to hell in a hand basket</a>. (Even so, that doesn&#8217;t make the conversations we  have with our spouses &#8211; such as this recent exchange with my wife &#8211; any easier:  &quot;Honey, you remember that stock we lost $20,000 in? Well, we just bought more  &#8230;&quot;).</p>
<p>I may be the  trader in the family, but she knows the statistics, too. Even so, understanding  that it pays to &quot;buy when there&#8217;s blood in the streets&quot; doesn&#8217;t make the move  any easier. I&#8217;m sure you can relate on this point.</p>
<p>Q: Are there  any steps I can take right now to protect my assets, and even profit in today&#8217;s  markets?</p>
<p>Again, the  answer is: Absolutely. Using history as our guide, the real question is not  will the markets recover, but what&#8217;s necessary for them to do so? And what can  I do to protect my upside potential?</p>
<p>To make the  process a bit simpler, I&#8217;ve detailed three rules to follow:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>&quot;Sure things&quot; beat &quot;next-best things&quot; &#8211;  virtually every time:</strong> Having a properly balanced portfolio is the first, and most important, step to  surviving and prospering in uncertain markets. Believe it or not, many  investors are still &quot;putting the pedal to the metal,&quot; even though this is  hardly the time to do so.</li>
</ul>
<p>We  urge a proprietary 50-40-10 portfolio split (50% in &quot;Safety &amp; Balance,&quot; 40%  in &quot;Global Growth &amp; Income,&quot; and 10% in speculative investments that we&#8217;ve  playfully labeled as the &quot;Rocket Riders&quot; to underscore our point).  Quantitatively, this risk-reduction mix helps us avoid the losses of the broad  market during bearish periods, and achieve as much as 91% of the stock market&#8217;s  total returns during rallies &#8211; while using less than half the market risk to  accomplish all this.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Profit from inflation:</strong> When the markets get tough, inflation  can really eat into your returns. To counteract this, a good chunk of assets  should be focused squarely on commodities, energy and other stocks that  actually can dually benefit from inflation and raise prices for the goods and  services they sell as a means of additional protection. For added security and  upside, split &lsquo;em using the 50-40-10 structure above.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Go where the growth is</strong>: Within the next five to 10 years, <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2007/06/27/the-key-secrets-to-global-growth-profits/">global  investments are projected to double</a> to nearly $300 trillion, with 60% of  that growth coming from established markets such as the United States and  Japan. That means that tomorrow&#8217;s market leaders will probably be selling  products we&#8217;ve not yet seen, featuring names that we can&#8217;t pronounce.</li>
</ul>
<p>Right now the best values can be found in  global blue chips, offering the unbeatable combination of high cash flows and  strong pricing power. Not only have these shares been beaten down to the  cheapest levels we&#8217;ve seen in years, but they have plenty of cash on hand.</p>
<p>[<strong><u>Editor's Note</u></strong>: Investment  guru <a href="http://www.oxfonline.com/MMR/ROG0108mm.html?pub=MMR&#038;code=WMMRJ404">Jim  Rogers</a> predicted the global financial meltdown, as well as the twin  escalations in oil and food prices worldwide. To obtain a free copy of his new  best seller, &quot;<a href="http://www.oxfonline.com/MMR/ROG0108mm.html?pub=MMR&#038;code=WMMRJ404">A  Bull in China</a>,&quot; in which he details ways for investors to profit from these  trends, <a href="http://www.oxfonline.com/MMR/ROG0108mm.html?pub=MMR&#038;code=WMMRJ404">please  click here</a>.]</p>
<p><strong><u>News and  Related Story Notes</u></strong><u>:</u></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Money Morning Special Report</strong>:<br />
  <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/08/exclusive-interview-investment-guru-jim-rogers-predicts-more-pain-for-the-greenback-and-the-failure-of-the-federal-reserve/">Jim  Rogers: More Pain for the Greenback, and the Failure of the Federal Reserve</a>.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Money Morning Special Investment       Report</strong>:<br />
  <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2007/06/27/the-key-secrets-to-global-growth-profits/">Global  Investing: Has Wall Street Rigged the Game?</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/07/01/the-four-tough-questions-to-ask-yourself-in-a-tough-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Talks About Inflation and Interest Rates Will be on the Front Burner This Week as Economic Speculation Resumes</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/19/talks-about-inflation-and-interest-rates-will-be-on-the-front-burner-this-week-as-economic-speculation-resumes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/19/talks-about-inflation-and-interest-rates-will-be-on-the-front-burner-this-week-as-economic-speculation-resumes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 11:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Essay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/19/talks-about-inflation-and-interest-rates-will-be-on-the-front-burner-this-week-as-economic-speculation-resumes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By William Patalon III
  Executive Editor
  Money Morning/The Money Map Report
You can bet there will be a lot of discussion about interest  rates this week, thanks to the release of the producer price index (PPI) report  tomorrow (Tuesday) and the U.S. Federal Reserve meeting minutes on Wednesday.
The PPI report will undoubtedly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>By William Patalon III<br />
  Executive Editor</strong><br />
  <strong>Money Morning/The Money Map Report</strong></p>
<p>You can bet there will be a lot of discussion about interest  rates this week, thanks to the release of the producer price index (PPI) report  tomorrow (Tuesday) and the U.S. Federal Reserve meeting minutes on Wednesday.</p>
<p>The PPI report will undoubtedly rekindle the  inflation-versus-recession debate (with more than a few comments about  stagflation thrown in for good measure).</p>
<p>While the wholesale inflation gauge (PPI) provides another  look into how escalating food and energy prices are impacting the economy, the  most recent moves in oil and gas may not be factored in for another month or  two.</p>
<p>On an optimistic note, gasoline prices historically peak  around Memorial Day and then fall throughout the remainder of the summer. As  we&#8217;ve said here a number of times before, don&#8217;t expect that pattern to repeat  itself this year <strong>[Indeed, <u><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/19/saudi-arabia-agrees-to-increase-oil-output-after-crude-hits-another-new-high/">please click here</a></u> to check out a related  story in this issue of <em>Money Morning</em> that details our expectation that  oil-and-gasoline prices are headed even higher].</strong></p>
<p><u>In this column four weeks ago, we told you to ignore a  U.S. Energy Department forecast that gasoline prices at the pump would reach  $3.73 a gallon before falling. In fact, <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/14/with-the-energy-departments-prediction-for-gasoline-prices-the-experts-get-it-wrong-yet-again/">I  said flat out that the Energy Department was wrong</a></u>. And <strong><em>Money  Morning</em></strong> Investment Director Keith Fitz-Gerald shortly thereafter <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/11/one-sure-fire-sign-that-gas-prices-are-heading-higher/">reiterated  that belief that the Energy Department&#8217;s prediction was way off the beam</a>.  And how right we were &#8211; that price already has been surpassed and consumers in  some parts of California and Hawaii are paying in excess of $4.00 a gallon.</p>
<p>Less than two weeks ago <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/08/money-morning-boosts-oil-target-price-to-225-a-barrel-thanks-to-continued-scarcity-burgeoning-demand-in-china/">we  actually boosted our target price for oil to $225 a barrel</a> (remember that  Keith Fitz-Gerald, now <strong><em>Money Morning</em></strong>&#8217;s investment director, was  probably the first investment guru to predict triple-digit oil prices).</p>
<p>As noted, however, much of this won&#8217;t be reflected for a  couple of weeks.</p>
<p>Wednesday&#8217;s release of the minutes from the last Fed meeting  should provide investors with a bit more insight into the mindsets of central  bank policymakers and just how likely they will be to stand pat on interest  rates: In one of the most aggressive rate-cutting campaigns in the central  bank&#8217;s history, policymakers have pared the benchmark Federal Funds rate seven  times since mid-September. <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/05/better-than-expected-economic-reports-signal-the-economy-could-be-ready-for-a-fed-on-pause/">Investors  expect the Fed to sit tight</a> (and hold off on further rate activity) at  least through the summer months.</p>
<p>More retailers will report this week [<strong>Target Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ATGT">TGT</a>)</strong>, <strong>The Home Depot Inc.</strong> <strong>(<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AHD">HD</a>)</strong> but few  surprise are expected at this point in an earnings cycle that &#8211; except for the  discounters &#8211; has been <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/14/retail-sales-slip-even-as-consumers-continue-to-spend/">full  of disappointing retail-sales reports</a>.</p>
<h3>The Money Morning Story SNAFU</h3>
<p>When they received their daily e-letter last Monday,  sharp-eyed <strong><em>Money Morning</em></strong> readers noticed something peculiar about  this column.</p>
<p>It seemed familiar.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a very good reason they felt that way. They were  right.</p>
<p>Due to a technical problem, and some human error, the column  we&#8217;d put together for Monday&#8217;s newsletter was inadvertently replaced <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/14/with-the-energy-departments-prediction-for-gasoline-prices-the-experts-get-it-wrong-yet-again/">by  the afore-mentioned April 14 story</a> in which we&#8217;d told you that the Energy  Department&#8217;s optimism about summer gasoline prices was wrong. </p>
<p>We replaced that story on the Web site <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/12/will-this-weeks-retail-reports-help-investors-decode-the-mystery-of-the-u.s.-economy-2-2/">with  the correct piece</a> &#8211; a warning about the week&#8217;s upcoming retail-sales  reports, but we heard about the mistake. As we deserved to.</p>
<p>As bad as we felt about the mistake, we still found several  positives. First and foremost, we were reminded yet again that we have a loyal  following that reads our work closely and carefully &#8211; and for the most part  enjoys and benefits from what we do.</p>
<p>And if you all had to read one of our &quot;old&quot; stories a second  time, I&#8217;m happy to say that it was a strongly worded prediction piece that  proved us correct.</p>
<h3>Market Matters</h3>
<p>Over that past year-plus, the  subprime debacle and related credit crisis have prompted discussions about  &quot;disaster,&quot; &quot;devastation,&quot; &quot;tragedy,&quot; and &quot;catastrophe.&quot;&nbsp; Homeowners were unable to afford their  houses, institutions faced significant asset write-downs, hard-working folks  lost jobs, and investors watched portfolio values decline.&nbsp; While these financial consequences  undoubtedly have been traumatic for many, the events of the past two weeks can  serve to lend some perspective.&nbsp; The  death toll in Myanmar has reached about 80,000 with another 50,000 people still  missing.&nbsp; Likewise, in China, where the earthquake  eventually may take over 50,000 lives as well.&nbsp;  Somehow, missing quarterly earnings by a few cents simply does not seem  quite as significant.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Speaking of&hellip;earnings season  plugged along and the results to date have given some analysts (the slightest)  reason for optimism.&nbsp; As the week began,  about 90% of <strong><a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=626307">Standard  &amp; Poor&#8217;s 500 Index</a></strong> companies had reported and 62% actually beat  expectations.&nbsp; While average quarterly  earnings have plummeted by over 17% on a consolidated basis, the results looked  far stronger once the financial firms were removed from the equation.</p>
<p>Without that struggling sector,  first-quarter profits actually increased by more than 7%.&nbsp; Retailers took center stage this week as <strong>Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=wmt&#038;hl=en">WMT</a>)</strong> proved  again that discounters are benefiting from the current consumer  nervousness.&nbsp; However, while <strong>Macy&#8217;s Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=m&#038;hl=en&#038;meta=hl%3Den">M</a>)</strong> and <strong>JC Penney Co. Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AJCP">JCP</a>)</strong> suffered  from weak sales, their results (and guidance) bested Street projections.&nbsp; <strong>Sony  Corp. (ADR: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=sne&#038;hl=en&#038;meta=hl%3Den">SNE</a>)</strong> rebounded as TVs and cameras moved back onto consumer shopping lists.&nbsp; Bond insurers <strong>MBIA Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AMBI">MBI</a>)</strong> and <strong>Freddie Mac (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=fre&#038;hl=en&#038;meta=hl%3Den">FRE</a>)</strong> reported wider losses, while UK-based <strong>HBSC</strong> <strong>Holdings PLC (ADR: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AHBC">HBC</a>)</strong> realized  higher profits.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </p>
<p>Board directors and corporate  execs again played &quot;Let&#8217;s Make a Deal&quot; as <strong>CBS</strong> <strong>Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=cbs&#038;hl=en&#038;meta=hl%3Den">CBS</a>)</strong> announced its intent to buy <strong>CNET  Networks Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=cnet&#038;hl=en&#038;meta=hl%3Den">CNET</a>)</strong>; <strong>Hewlett-Packard Co. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=hpq&#038;hl=en&#038;meta=hl%3Den">HPQ</a>)</strong> made overtures toward <strong>Electronic Data  Systems Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=eds&#038;hl=en&#038;meta=hl%3Den">EDS</a>)</strong>; <strong>General Electric Co. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=GE&#038;hl=en&#038;meta=hl%3Den">GE</a>) </strong>is <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/16/with-its-profits-lagging-ge-may-have-a-deal-in-the-oven-analysts-say/">reportedly  putting its long-time appliance biz  up for auction</a>; and billionaire stakeholder Carl Icahn pushed  for <strong>Yahoo! Inc.</strong> <strong>(<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=yhoo&#038;hl=en">YHOO</a>)</strong> management to reopen talks with <strong>Microsoft  Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AMSFT">MSFT</a>)</strong>.&nbsp; Analysts often welcome merger news and  consider it a positive sign of a rebounding business climate.&nbsp; <strong>Research  in Motion</strong> <strong>Ltd. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ:RIMM">RIMM</a>)</strong> shares soared this week on news that its newest Blackberry creation will soon  hit the market; and <strong>Merck</strong> <strong>&amp;  Co. Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AMRK">MRK</a>)</strong> received a major victory when a Texas appeals court overturned a Vioxx verdict  that, initially, awarded $32 million in damages.&nbsp; </p>
<p><strong>Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=gs&#038;hl=en&#038;meta=hl%3Den">GS</a>)</strong> apparently enjoyed the limelight (and the stir its analysts caused) two weeks  ago. Last week, the investment bank was at it again, forecasting that crude  prices will rise to $141 a barrel during the second half of 2008.&nbsp; Oil surged to about $128 a barrel late last  week as gasoline prices soared to over $3.75 a gallon &#8211; just a week before the  widely-traveled Memorial Day weekend.</p>
<p>The <strong><a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=INDEXSP%3A.INX">S&amp;P 500 Index</a></strong> and the <strong><a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=13756934">Nasdaq  Composite Index</a></strong> each hit five-month highs, although some profit-taking  set in as the week came to a close.&nbsp;  Hopefully, the weekend will bring some positive developments in Myanmar  and China (or, at least, a beginning to the end of the devastation).&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <br />
  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="450">
<tr>
<td width="141" valign="top">
        <strong>Market/Index</strong> </td>
<td width="107" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>Previous    Week</strong><br />
            <strong>(05/09/08)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>Current    Week </strong><br />
            <strong>(05/16/08)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="84" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>YTD    Change</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141" valign="top">
<p>Dow Jones    Industrial </p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top">
<p align="right">12,745.88<strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>12,986.80</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="84" valign="bottom">
<p align="right"><strong>-2.10%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141" valign="top">
<p>NASDAQ</p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top">
<p align="right">2,445.52<strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>2,528.85</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="84" valign="bottom">
<p align="right"><strong>-4.65%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141" valign="top">
<p>S&amp;P 500</p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top">
<p align="right">1,388.28<strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>1,425.35</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="84" valign="bottom">
<p align="right"><strong>-2.93%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141" valign="top">
<p>Russell 2000 </p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top">
<p align="right">720.05<strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>741.17</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="84" valign="bottom">
<p align="right"><strong>-3.25%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141" valign="top">
<p>Fed Funds</p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top">
<p align="right">2.00%<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>2.00%</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="84" valign="bottom">
<p align="right"><strong>-225 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141" valign="top">
<p>10 yr Treasury    (Yield)</p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top">
<p align="right">3.77%<strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>3.85%</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="84" valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>-19 bps </strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h3>Economically Speaking</h3>
<p>As regular <strong><em>Money Morning</em></strong> readers know all too well, we  are big believers that Wall Street analysts are a fickle bunch.&nbsp; Just a few weeks ago, virtually everyone and  their mothers believed that a recession was <em><a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=fait%20accompli">fait accompli</a></em> (my mother was a holdout).&nbsp; In a recent <strong>Merrill Lynch &amp; Co. Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=mer&#038;hl=en">MER</a>)</strong> survey,  only 29% of global fund managers expect the whispered-about &quot;R&quot; word to become  a reality and many now feel that inflation is a greater domestic concern.&nbsp; Some economists are crediting the work of the  Fed for improving the credit markets, though Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S.  Bernanke himself claimed that the situation remained &quot;far from normal.&quot;&nbsp;  Bernanke, however, did praise financial institutions by noting that he  is &quot;encouraged by the recent ability  of banks to raise capital from diverse sources.&quot;&nbsp; Meanwhile, the bankers themselves continued  to offer less-than-favorable assessments.</p>
<p><strong>JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AJPM">JPM</a>) </strong>Chief Executive  Officer <strong><a href="http://stocks.us.reuters.com/stocks/OfficersDirectorsDetails.asp?rpc=66&#038;symbol=JPM&#038;officerID=506000">James  &quot;Jamie&quot; Dimon</a> </strong>believes<strong> </strong>that the credit crisis is nearing an end, but &quot;<em>the recession is just beginning</em>.&quot;&nbsp;  Likewise, <strong>Bank of America Corp.</strong>&#8217;s (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=bac&#038;hl=en&#038;meta=hl%3Den">BAC</a>)  Global Consumer Banking president, <strong><a href="http://stocks.us.reuters.com/stocks/OfficersDirectorsDetails.asp?rpc=66&#038;symbol=BAC&#038;officerID=528214">Liam  E. McGee</a></strong>, finds that consumers still feel &quot;<em>significant economic pressure</em>.&quot;&nbsp; </p>
<p>Turning to the numbers, retail sales dropped by 0.2% in April, as auto  sales suffered its worst showing in 10 months.&nbsp;  Once autos were factored out of the data (some economists always look  for that silver lining), retail sales actually surged by 0.5%, a much better  result than many analysts had expected.</p>
<p>Likewise, the news from the inflation front was not half-bad  either.&nbsp; The consumer price index (CPI)  climbed by only 0.2%, despite the significant rise in food costs.&nbsp; Still, many economists point out that oil and  gas prices are setting new records daily (thanks Goldman), and the overall  inflation picture may get worse before it gets better.&nbsp; Though housing starts skyrocketed in April &#8211;  recording their largest gain in over two years &#8211; the naysayers remain  pessimistic on the sector, contending that the increase was the result of  apartment construction and noting that single-family home starts continue to  struggle.&nbsp; Despite some positive economic  readings, a consumer confidence poll revealed that recent sentiment fell to its  lowest level in 28 years.&nbsp; </p>
<p><strong>Weekly Economic Calendar</strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="450">
<tr>
<td>
        <strong>Date</strong> </td>
<td>
<p><strong>Release</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>Comments </strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>May 12</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Treasury Budget    Statement (04/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>April surplus over 10% lower than in 2007</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>May 13</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Retail Sales    (04/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Net loss, though gains when factoring out weak auto sales </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>May 14</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>CPI (04/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Better than expected reading on retail inflation </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>May 15</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Initial Jobless    Claims (05/10/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Slight increase in claims </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Industrial    Production (04/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>2nd consecutive monthly decline </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>May 16</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Housing Starts    (04/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Biggest increase in construction in more than 2 years </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>The Week Ahead</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>&nbsp;</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>May 19</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Leading Eco.    Indicators (4/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>May 20</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>PPI (04/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>May 21</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Fed Minutes</p>
</td>
<td>
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>May 22</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Initial Jobless    Claims (05/17/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>May 23</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Existing Home    Sales (04/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h3><u>News and Related Story Links:</u></h3>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Money Morning       Economic Analysis: <br />
  </strong><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/05/better-than-expected-economic-reports-signal-the-economy-could-be-ready-for-a-fed-on-pause/">Better       Than Expected Economic Reports Signal the Economy Could Be Ready for a Fed       on Pause</a>. </p>
</li>
<li><strong>Money Morning Economic Analysis</strong>: <br />
  <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/01/with-seven-rate-cuts-since-fall-could-the-fed-be-exporting-stagflation-to-europe/">With       Seven Rate Cuts Since Fall, Could the Fed Be Exporting Stagflation to       Europe?</a> </p>
</li>
<li><strong>Money Morning Special Investment&nbsp; Research Report</strong>: <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/08/money-morning-boosts-oil-target-price-to-225-a-barrel-thanks-to-continued-scarcity-burgeoning-demand-in-china/"><br />
  Money       Morning Boosts Oil Target Price to $225 a Barrel, Thanks to Continued       Scarcity, Burgeoning Demand in China</a> </p>
</li>
<li><strong>Money Morning Weekly Forecast Column</strong>: <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/14/with-the-energy-departments-prediction-for-gasoline-prices-the-experts-get-it-wrong-yet-again/"><br />
  With       the Energy Department&#8217;s Prediction for Gasoline Prices, the &lsquo;Experts&#8217; Get       it Wrong Yet Again</a>.</p>
</li>
<li><strong>Money Morning Financial Commentary</strong>: <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/11/one-sure-fire-sign-that-gas-prices-are-heading-higher/"><br />
  One       Sure-Fire Sign That Gas Prices are Heading Higher</a>.</p>
</li>
<li><strong>Money Morning Weekly Forecast Column</strong>: <br />
  <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/12/will-this-weeks-retail-reports-help-investors-decode-the-mystery-of-the-u.s.-economy-2-2/">Will       This Week&#8217;s Retail Reports Help Investors Decode the Mystery of the U.S.       Economy?</a> </p>
</li>
<li><strong>Money Morning News</strong>: <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/16/with-its-profits-lagging-ge-may-have-a-deal-in-the-oven-analysts-say/"><br />
  With       its Profits Lagging, GE May Have a Deal in the Oven, Analysts Say</a>.&nbsp;</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/19/talks-about-inflation-and-interest-rates-will-be-on-the-front-burner-this-week-as-economic-speculation-resumes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will This Week&#8217;s Retail Reports Help Investors Decode the Mystery of the U.S. Economy?</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/12/will-this-weeks-retail-reports-help-investors-decode-the-mystery-of-the-us-economy-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/12/will-this-weeks-retail-reports-help-investors-decode-the-mystery-of-the-us-economy-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 23:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Patalon III</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Patalon III]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/12/will-this-weeks-retail-reports-help-investors-decode-the-mystery-of-the-u.s.-economy-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editor&#8217;s Note: Due to a technical error,  yesterday&#8217;s Money Morning newsletter contained the wrong lead story.  Although the story was posted to our Web site late yesterday morning, we&#8217;ve  re-sent the story to news-service recipients who might not have seen it.
  

By William Patalon III  
  Executive  Editor
 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><u>Editor&#8217;s Note</u>: Due to a technical error,  yesterday&#8217;s <em>Money Morning</em> newsletter contained the wrong lead story.  Although the story was posted to our Web site late yesterday morning, we&#8217;ve  re-sent the story to news-service recipients who might not have seen it.</strong>
  </p>
</p>
<p><strong>By William Patalon III  <br />
  Executive  Editor</strong><br />
  <strong>Money  Morning/The Money Map Report</strong>
</p>
<p>The U.S. retail sector will be in the spotlight this week, as investors  continue their efforts to gauge the health of the U.S. economy.</p>
<p>Such key retailers as <strong>Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=wmt">WMT</a>)</strong>, <strong>Macy&#8217;s Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AM">M</a>)</strong>, <strong>J.C. Penney Co. Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AJCP">JCP</a>)</strong>, <strong>Abercrombie &amp; Fitch Co. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AANF">ANF</a>)</strong>, and <strong>Nordstrom  Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AJWN">JWN</a>)</strong> all  are scheduled to report quarterly earnings. Then there&#8217;s the April retail-sales  data, which will give economists and investors alike a good look at the mindset  of the U.S. consumer.</p>
<p>After all, consumer activity accounts for as much as 70% of the U.S. economy&#8217;s  growth. With the retail-sales numbers, however, keep in mind that the steeply  escalating price of gasoline is almost certain to skew the overall  reading.&nbsp; </p>
<p>With the U.S. Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank both  expressing serious concerns about inflation, all eyes will be on this week&#8217;s  release of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) report, which will help reveal just  how quickly and significantly energy prices are working their way to other  sectors of the economy.</p>
<p>Listen closely as certain economists claim that &quot;core&quot; inflation is  more telling &#8211; and provides a more-accurate picture of the economy&#8217;s health &#8211;  than the overall number because <em>food and  energy components are highly volatile.</em> You see, &quot;<a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/65490-non-core-inflation-firmly-in-double-digit-range">non-core</a>&quot;  inflation actually includes food and energy prices. In more-normal periods,  looking at &quot;core&quot; inflation might make more sense, since food and fuel can be  prone to short-term swings that muddy the waters and make analysis tougher over  shorter stretches.</p>
<p>But these days, no legitimate  conversation about the economy or price pressures can take place without  serious consideration of oil and gasoline. And what about food? With the way  global commodity prices are shooting skyward, that part of the family budget  can&#8217;t be ignored, either.</p>
<p>Memorial Day is just around the  corner and summer vacations are being planned in earnest (or perhaps they  aren&#8217;t). Can travelers afford those family driving excursions, given the high  costs of food and fuel? <strong>[Check out a related <em>Money Morning</em> report  that details <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/09/soaring-oil-and-gasoline-prices-worry-cost-conscious-u.s.-consumers/">the  impact soaring oil and gas prices are having on U.S. consumers</a>.]</strong></p>
<p>And what about vacations abroad?  Fuel is a major element for airlines, so we can probably expect airfares to  climb as fast as the jets the carriers fly. And with the way the U.S. dollar  has been hammered, U.S. consumers may not be able to afford overseas sojourns  anyway. Only time will tell <strong>[For a related story on <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/09/weak-dollar-narrows-trade-deficit-but-inflation-blunts-consumer-demand/">the  woes the weak greenback is causing</a> consumers, <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/12/dollar-rallies-on-presumed-pause-for-the-fed/">please click here</a>].</strong></p>
<h3>Market Matters</h3>
<p>What a difference a few days can  make.&nbsp; Two weeks ago, <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/08/a-currency-conundrum-beware-of-the-u.s.-dollars-head-fake-rally/">a  rallying dollar</a> appeared to put a cap on energy prices (and the price of  other commodities), and &quot;nervous&quot; consumers breathed a (brief) sigh of relief  as the summer travel months rapidly approached.&nbsp;  Suddenly, <strong>Goldman Sachs Group  Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=gs&#038;hl=en">GS</a>) </strong>chose  to make that bold prediction that oil could reach $150 to $200 a barrel over  the next six to 24 months, helping oil prices skyrocket over five consecutive  record-setting sessions. <strong></strong></p>
<p>Curiously, the <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/goldman-sachs-goads-raging-oil/story.aspx?guid=%7B329F91B2%2D25DC%2D4B14%2DBF86%2DC6CB6098E748%7D">Goldman  Sachs prediction that ignited the firestorm</a> in the oil-prices market <a href="http://www.arabianbusiness.com/index.php?option=com_content&#038;view=article&#038;id=513777&#038;Itemid=1">was  nothing more than a repeat of a prediction the investment bank had made in  mid-March</a>. Even more interesting: <strong><em>Money Morning</em></strong> Investment  Director Keith Fitz-Gerald has been predicting higher prices for some time and  actually beat Goldman to market with both of its predictions (which he wasn&#8217;t  aware Goldman was assembling, of course): Fitz-Gerald <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2007/12/20/outlook-2008-how-to-profit-when-oil-bubbles-up-above-the-100-level/">first  publicly predicted a target price of $187 a barrel in December</a>, and <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/03/13/three-ways-to-play-money-mornings-prediction-that-oil-prices-will-reach-187-a-barrel/">reiterated  that prediction in mid-March</a>; more recently, <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/08/money-morning-boosts-oil-target-price-to-225-a-barrel-thanks-to-continued-scarcity-burgeoning-demand-in-china/">Fitz-Gerald  boosted his target price to $225 a barrel</a>.</p>
<p>One final note that underscores the  often-contrary nature of investors and the capital markets: Given the fuss made  over Goldman&#8217;s &quot;encore prediction&quot; for oil prices of $175 to $200 a barrel,  we&#8217;re stunned that there was almost no response at all to <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=10995405">CIBC World Markets</a>&#8216;  prediction <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/gasoline-could-hit-7-oil/story.aspx?guid=%7B824E895C%2DF649%2D4526%2D89F1%2D50C198A8A0D5%7D">that  gasoline could hit $7 a gallon in four  years</a>.  But that prognostication failed to even cause a stir (although, in typical  fashion, we made sure to tell you all about it as part of our own oil-price  forecast last week). It&#8217;s worth noting what CIBC analyst Jeff Rubin had to say.</p>
<p>According to a statement by Rubin, crude-oil supplies are  actually lower than some official estimates indicate, while demand is unlikely  to fall anytime soon. Those tighter supplies and continued strong demand will  drive oil and gasoline prices to roughly double their current levels by 2012. </p>
<p>&quot;It is increasingly clear that the outlook for oil supply  signals a period of unprecedented scarcity,&quot; Rubin said. &quot;Despite the recent  record jump in oil prices, oil prices will continue to rise steadily over the  next five years.&quot;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a decidedly sobering &#8211; if not a downright scary &#8211;  prospect, to be sure. But there are steps investors can take, moves they can  make to profit in order to offset some &#8211; if not all &#8211; of this pocketbook pain. <strong>[For just that reason, take the time to read <em>Money  Morning</em> Investment Director Keith Fitz-Gerald's investment research report  that provides <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/03/13/three-ways-to-play-money-mornings-prediction-that-oil-prices-will-reach-187-a-barrel/">three  ways to profit from the run-up in oil prices</a>. The report is free of  charge].</strong> </p>
<p>In any case, despite a weekly  inventory report that revealed greater than expected oil and gasoline supplies,  crude prices pushed beyond the $126 a barrel level. Year-to-date, crude has  surged about 30% and has virtually doubled from last year&#8217;s pace.&nbsp; Energy analysts claimed that $150 crude would  suggest gas prices of more than $4.50 a gallon, quite a run-up from the record  of $3.67 the average consumer is now paying at the pumps.&nbsp; </p>
<p>For now, the <a href="http://www.opec.org/home/">Organization of the Petroleum Exporting  Countries</a> (OPEC) seems content to maintain its current production output  and blames failed U.S. economic policies for the dire domestic conditions. The  cartel next meets in September and only recently gave slight overtures that an  early consultation may be in the cards.&nbsp;  (Don&#8217;t hold your breath.)&nbsp; Now  comes news that Venezuelan President <strong><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugo_chavez">Hugo Chavez</a></strong> may be  supporting rebel forces in Colombia, a move that could bring sanctions against  his country (and prompt retaliation in the form of reduced oil sales).  Meanwhile, two presidential hopefuls &#8211; Democratic Sen. <strong><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_clinton">Hillary R. Clinton</a></strong> and Republican <strong><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_mccain">John  McCain</a></strong> continue to push for a &quot;gas-tax holiday,&quot; despite consensus  economic views that such policy would benefit oil companies far more than  consumers.&nbsp; Finally, a bit of good  energy-related news.&nbsp; In an attempt to  boost sluggish sales, <strong><a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=4090940">Chrysler Corp.</a></strong> introduced its &quot;<em>Let&#8217;s Refuel America</em>&quot;  gimmick in which new car purchasers can lock in the price of gasoline at $2.99  per gallon for the next three years&nbsp; (Of  course, they have to buy a Chrysler, Jeep, or Dodge to participate).</p>
<p>Earnings season did little to  reverse the negative mood set by the energy sector as a few big financials &#8211; <strong>Fannie Mae (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AFNM">FNM</a>)</strong>, <strong>UBS AG (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=ubs">UBS</a>),</strong> <strong>Wachovia Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AWB">WB</a>)</strong>, and <strong>American International Group Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=aig&#038;hl=en">AIG</a></strong>) &#8211;  reported poor quarters with few optimistic signs for the months ahead.&nbsp; Even <strong>Berkshire  Hathaway Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABRK.A">BRK.A</a>, <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABRK.B">BRK.B</a>)</strong> took  a significant hit on certain derivatives, though Warren Buffett claimed such  contracts ultimately would prove profitable. (Interesting how Buffett  criticized everyone from regulators to politicos to investors for the credit  crisis and then revealed some &quot;challenges&quot; in his own house last quarter).&nbsp; The <strong>Yahoo!  Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AYHOO">YHOO</a>)/Microsoft  Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=msft&#038;hl=en">MSFT</a>)</strong> deal appears to be dead in the water (for now), as Microsoft founder Bill Gates and Chief Executive <strong><a href="http://stocks.us.reuters.com/stocks/OfficersDirectorsDetails.asp?rpc=66&#038;symbol=MSFT.O&#038;officerID=28067">Steven  Ballmer</a> </strong>head back to the &quot;Corporate Strategy&quot; drawing board in the  ongoing competition with <strong>Google Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=goog&#038;hl=en&#038;meta=hl%3Den">GOOG</a>)</strong>,  and Yahoo co-founder and CEO <strong><a href="http://stocks.us.reuters.com/stocks/OfficersDirectorsDetails.asp?rpc=66&#038;symbol=YHOO.O&#038;officerID=2885">Jerry  Yang</a></strong> tries to find another white knight while explaining to  shareholders why he may have taken money out of their pockets.</p>
<p>Equity investors took a break  (hopefully short-lived) from the recent optimism and focused on the negative  energy and earnings news. In reality, last week brought little substantive  corporate or economic developments; many took the opportunity to lock in  profits from the recent bullish run. As those tax rebates hit their mailboxes  (see below), consumers soon should have a few extra bucks to take to the malls,  put a down-payment on a Chrysler, or pay for a few tanks of gas.</p>
<p align="center">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="450">
<tr>
<td width="141" valign="top">
        <strong>Market/Index</strong> </td>
<td width="107" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>Previous    Week</strong><br />
            <strong>(05/02/08)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>Current    Week </strong><br />
            <strong>(05/09/08)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="84" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>YTD    Change</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141" valign="top">
<p>Dow Jones    Industrial </p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top">
<p align="right">13,058.20 </p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top">
<p align="right">12,745.88<strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="84" valign="bottom">
<p align="right"><strong>-3.91%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141" valign="top">
<p>NASDAQ</p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top">
<p align="right">2,476.99 </p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top">
<p align="right">2,445.52<strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="84" valign="bottom">
<p align="right"><strong>-7.80%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141" valign="top">
<p>S&amp;P 500</p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top">
<p align="right">1,413.90 </p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top">
<p align="right">1,388.28<strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="84" valign="bottom">
<p align="right"><strong>-5.45%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141" valign="top">
<p>Russell 2000 </p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top">
<p align="right">725.74 </p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top">
<p align="right">720.05<strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="84" valign="bottom">
<p align="right"><strong>-6.00%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141" valign="top">
<p>Fed Funds</p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top">
<p align="right">2.00%</p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top">
<p align="right">2.00%<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="84" valign="bottom">
<p align="right"><strong>-225 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141" valign="top">
<p>10 yr Treasury    (Yield)</p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top">
<p align="right">3.85% </p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top">
<p align="right">3.77%<strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="84" valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>-27 bps </strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h3>Economically Speaking</h3>
<p>With little in the way of economic data released last week, the talking  heads captured the limelight with some (contrasting) views on the state of the  times.&nbsp; European Central Bank President <strong><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Claude_Trichet">Jean-Claude Trichet</a></strong> revealed his &quot;significant&quot; concern about inflation and, subsequently, left the  ECB&#8217;s primary interest rate unchanged at 4.0%.&nbsp;  Likewise, Kansas City Fed  President Thomas M. Hoenig warned of &quot;troublesome,&quot; &quot;serious,&quot; and  &quot;unacceptably high levels&quot; of price pressures (though, as a non-voting Fed  member, no one seems to much cares what he has to say). Meanwhile, Treasury  Secretary <strong><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Paulson">Henry  &quot;Hammerin&#8217; Hank&quot; Paulson</a></strong> indicated that the Administration believes the  &quot;worst is likely behind us,&quot; while his boss praised the economic stimulus  package in which 130 million folks will soon be receiving tax rebates to help  boost consumer spending.</p>
<p>The economy got a surprising shot-in-the-arm from the services sector  as the non-manufacturing ISM index revealed expansion for the first time in four  months. About 80% of economic activity is derived from the services sector, so  the data may have offered further proof that Paulson and friends may be right.  Consumers took advantage of the lower interest rates last month as April  borrowing (particularly auto loans) climbed at its fastest pace in four months.  Retailers experienced mixed results during April as shoppers continued to favor  discounters and wholesale clubs like <strong>Wal-Mart</strong> and <strong>Costco</strong> <strong>Wholesale Corp.</strong> <strong>(<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3ACOST">COST</a>)</strong> over  apparel stores like <strong>Limited Brands Inc.  (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ALTD">LTD</a>)</strong>, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Gap Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AGPS">GPS</a>)</strong>,  and <strong>Nordstrom</strong>.&nbsp; Meanwhile, the UBS-International Council of  Shopping Centers retail sales survey showed that activity in April far exceeded  expectations.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Weekly Economic Calendar</strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="450">
<tr>
<td>
        <strong>Date</strong> </td>
<td>
<p><strong>Release</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>Comments </strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>May 5</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>ISM &#8211; Services    (04/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Surprising sector expansion </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>May 7</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Consumer Credit    (03/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Best showing in 4 months </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>May 8</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Initial Jobless    Claims (05/03/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Level of claims declined more than anticipated </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>May 9</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Balance of Trade    (03/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Larger than expected decline </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>The Week Ahead</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>&nbsp;</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>May 12</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Treasury Budget    Statement (04/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>May 13</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Retail Sales    (04/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>May 14</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>CPI (04/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>May 15</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Initial Jobless    Claims (05/10/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Industrial    Production (04/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>May 16</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Housing Starts    (04/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h3><u>News and Related Story Links:</u></h3>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Seeking       Alpha</strong>:<br />
  <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/65490-non-core-inflation-firmly-in-double-digit-range">Non-core  Inflation Firmly in Double-Digit Range</a>.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Money       Morning News Analysis</strong>:<br />
  <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/09/soaring-oil-and-gasoline-prices-worry-cost-conscious-u.s.-consumers/">Soaring  Oil and Gasoline Prices Worry Cost-Conscious U.S. Consumers</a>.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Money       Morning News Analysis</strong>: <br />
  <a href="../../../../../jyousfi/Local%20Settings/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/OLK142/Weak%20Dollar%20Narrows%20Trade%20Deficit,%20but%20Inflation%20Blunts%20Consumer%20Demand">Weak  Dollar Narrows </a></li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Money       Morning Financial Analysis:</strong><br />
  <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/08/a-currency-conundrum-beware-of-the-u.s.-dollars-head-fake-rally/">A  Currency Conundrum: Beware of the U.S. Dollar&#8217;s &quot;Head Fake&quot; Rally</a>.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>M</strong><strong>oney Morning Oil Price       Analysis:</strong><br />
  <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/08/money-morning-boosts-oil-target-price-to-225-a-barrel-thanks-to-continued-scarcity-burgeoning-demand-in-china/">Money  Morning Boosts Oil Target Price to $225 a Barrel, Thanks to Continued Scarcity,  Burgeoning Demand in China.</a></li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Money Morning Special Investment Research Report</strong>: <br />
  <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/03/13/three-ways-to-play-money-mornings-prediction-that-oil-prices-will-reach-187-a-barrel/">Three  Ways to Play Money Morning&#8217;s Prediction That Oil Prices Will Reach $187 a Barrel</a>. </li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Money Morning Special Economic Forecasting Series       Project</strong>: <br />
  <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2007/12/20/outlook-2008-how-to-profit-when-oil-bubbles-up-above-the-100-level/">Outlook  2008: How to Profit When Oil Bubbles Up Above the $100 Level</a>.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>ArabianBusiness.com</strong>:<br />
  <a href="http://www.arabianbusiness.com/index.php?option=com_content&#038;view=article&#038;id=513777&#038;Itemid=1">Crude  to hit $175, Says Goldman Sachs</a>.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>MarketWatch.com</strong>:<br />
  <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/goldman-sachs-goads-raging-oil/story.aspx?guid=%7B329F91B2%2D25DC%2D4B14%2DBF86%2DC6CB6098E748%7D">Goldman  Sachs and the oil bulls.</a> </li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/12/will-this-weeks-retail-reports-help-investors-decode-the-mystery-of-the-us-economy-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Week&#8217;s Profit Reports Could Render Final Verdict on First Quarter Earnings Season</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/05/this-weeks-profit-reports-could-render-final-verdict-on-first-quarter-earnings-season/</link>
		<comments>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/05/this-weeks-profit-reports-could-render-final-verdict-on-first-quarter-earnings-season/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 11:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Patalon III</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Essay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Patalon III]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/05/this-weeks-profit-reports-could-render-final-verdict-on-first-quarter-earnings-season/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By William Patalon III
    Executive Editor
    Money Morning/The Money Map Report
With earnings season starting to wind down, investors are not  anticipating many new surprises.&#160; Still,  a few prominent players are set to report this week led by The Walt Disney Co. (DIS) (entertainment), Cisco Systems Inc. (CSCO) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>By William Patalon III</strong><br />
    <strong>Executive Editor</strong><br />
    <strong>Money Morning/The Money Map Report</strong></p>
<p>With earnings season starting to wind down, investors are not  anticipating many new surprises.&nbsp; Still,  a few prominent players are set to report this week led by <strong>The Walt</strong> <strong>Disney Co. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=disney&#038;hl=en">DIS</a>) </strong>(entertainment), <strong>Cisco Systems Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=csco&#038;hl=en&#038;meta=hl%3Den">CSCO</a>)</strong> (tech), and<strong> American International Group  Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=aig&#038;hl=en&#038;meta=hl%3Den">AIG</a>)</strong> (financial services).</p>
<p>The <strong>Microsoft Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=msft&#038;hl=en&#038;meta=hl%3Den">MSFT</a>)</strong>/<strong>Yahoo Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AYHOO">YHOO</a>)</strong> (and  occasionally <strong>Google Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=goog&#038;hl=en&#038;meta=hl%3Den">GOOG</a>)</strong>)  soap opera will be worth watching &#8211; if only to make sure that Microsoft&#8217;s  withdrawal isn&#8217;t a cover ploy for a hostile run at Yahoo [<strong>For a related news  story in this issue of <em>Money Morning</em> that details <u>Microsoft's  decision drop its pursuit of Yahoo</u>, please <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/05/microsoft-withdraws-yahoo-bid/">click here</a></strong>].</p>
<p>A  slow schedule on this week&#8217;s economic calendar will prompt a much greater focus  on the dollar as investors speculate on whether the price run-up in commodities  &#8211; and oil &#8211; is at, or near its end. Gold prices will help make that  determination [<strong>For <u>a related news analysis of gold prices</u> in this  issue of <em>Money Morning</em>, please <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/05/making-sense-of-and-profiting-from-golds-dip-below-850/">click here</a></strong>].</p>
<p>U.S.  Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke is scheduled to address the Columbia  Business School on mortgage issues, though he&#8217;ll surely also be asked about  central bank policies by a rapt audience whose members will hang on his every  word.&nbsp; [Wasn't he supposed to be on  vacation?]</p>
<p>Last week&#8217;s earnings saw some  energy companies that were benefiting from the most recent surge in energy  prices. Though <strong>Exxon Mobil Corp</strong>. <strong>(<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=xom&#038;hl=en">XOM</a>) </strong>only  claimed the second-highest profit ever (it also holds the title for the single  best quarter ever), the results nevertheless disappointed Wall Street, which  was obviously pulling for a new record.</p>
<p>Likewise, <strong>Chevron Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ACVX">CVX</a>)</strong> and <strong>BP</strong> <strong>PLC (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABP">BP</a>)</strong> reported  favorable periods.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/03/20/after-its-u.s.-record-ipo-visas-shares-should-generate-long-term-profits-for-investors-an-expert-says/">In  the wake of the recent initial public offering (IPO) of credit-card processor <strong>Visa  Inc.</strong></a><strong> (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AV">V</a>),</strong> rival <strong>MasterCard</strong> <strong>Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AMA">MA</a>)</strong> doubled its  earnings last quarter as its international business helped overcome domestic  weakness.&nbsp; Consumer-products giant <strong>The</strong> <strong>Procter &amp; Gamble</strong> <strong>Co. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3APG">PG</a>)</strong> also received  good news from overseas with higher sales of consumer goods like diapers  (Pampers), razors (Gillette), and shampoo (Head &amp; Shoulders) from certain  emerging markets.</p>
<p>Not all was rosy, however, as <strong>Sun Microsystems Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AJAVA">JAVA</a>)</strong> and food  giants <strong>Kellogg</strong> <strong>Co. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AK">K</a>)</strong> and new Warren  Buffet favorite <strong>Kraft</strong> <strong>Foods Inc.  (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AKFT">KFT</a>)</strong> each  fell prey to the continued economic &quot;challenges&quot; in the U.S. market.</p>
<p>On the transactional front,  investor Kirk Kerkorian will boost his stake in <strong>Ford Motor Co. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=f&#038;hl=en">F</a>)</strong>,  in turn a nice boost for the domestic auto industry. <strong>Time Warner Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ATWX">TWX</a>) </strong>will be <a href="http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2008/05/01/whats-next-for-time-warner-cable.aspx">spinning  off its 84% stake in its cable operation</a>, <strong>Time Warner Cable Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ATWC">TWC</a>)</strong>.</p>
<p>And privately held M&amp;M&#8217;s-maker <strong>Mars  Inc</strong>. will buy <strong>Wm. Wrigley Jr. Co. </strong>(<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AWWY">WWY</a>) for over $20  billion in cash <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/29/mars-teams-up-with-berkshire-hathaway-and-warren-buffett-in-23-billion-buyout-of-wrigley/">with  financing help from famed sweet-tooth junkie, Warren Buffett</a>.</p>
<h3>Market Matters</h3>
<p align="center">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="450">
<tr>
<td>
        <strong>Market/Index</strong> </td>
<td>
<p align="center"><strong>Previous    Week</strong><br />
            <strong>(04/25/08)</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="center"><strong>Current    Week </strong><br />
            <strong>(05/02/08)</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="center"><strong>YTD    Change</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Dow Jones    Industrial </p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right">12,891.86 </p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right"><strong>13,058.20</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right"><strong>-1.56%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>NASDAQ</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right">2,422.93 </p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right"><strong>2,476.99</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right"><strong>-6.61%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>S&amp;P 500</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right">1,397.84 </p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right"><strong>1,413.90</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right"><strong>-3.71%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Russell 2000 </p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right">721.88 </p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right"><strong>725.74</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right"><strong>-5.26%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Fed Funds</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right">2.25%</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right"><strong>2.00%</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right"><strong>-225 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>10 yr Treasury    (Yield)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right">3.87% </p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right"><strong>3.85%</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right"><strong>-19 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Recession?&nbsp; What recession?&nbsp; For days, weeks, even months now, naysayers  had been predicting the emergence of that dreaded &quot;R&quot; word with the release of  1st quarter GDP.&nbsp;  Additionally, they claimed that the labor picture would continue to  worsen, gas prices would hit $4 a gallon by summer, the dollar would be worth  next to nothing, corporate earnings would signal more &quot;gloom and doom,&quot; and  high-net-worth investors would be making dramatic allocation shifts from the  &quot;risky&quot; equity markets.</p>
<p>Not so fast &#8230; the data released  last week appeared to portray an economy closer to a rebound &#8211; far from the  dire business climate the gloom-and-doomers had been predicting. A stronger  dollar that may have placed a ceiling on oil (and other commodities) prices,  and rich folks seemed to be looking for bargains in stocks.</p>
<p>Do we here at <strong><em>Money  Morning</em></strong> buy into that totally bullish scenario? </p>
<p>Not necessarily.</p>
<p>But we do agree that the next  few days, weeks, and months are going to get more interesting.</p>
<p>The latest <strong><a href="http://content.members.fidelity.com/Inside_Fidelity/fullStory/1,,7577,00.html">Fidelity  Investment&#8217;s <em>Millionaire Outlook</em></a></strong> reported (mildly) bullish  findings among its surveyed investors who have average investable assets  topping $4 million.&nbsp; Instead of  decreasing their equity allocations, 27% of these millionaires plan to add  stock positions during the next 12 months. Only 7% expect to sell out of  equities, which logically deduces 66% will be staying the course.&nbsp; Real estate seems to be another &quot;favored&quot;  asset class, as 14% of respondents say they will increase exposure to related  investments.&nbsp; That doesn&#8217;t quite sound  like &quot;gloom and doom&quot; at once.</p>
<p>Oil flirted with the $120 a  barrel level before sliding on a stronger dollar and news that the Fed may play  the &quot;wait and see&quot; game (see below).&nbsp;  Equity investors again took a &quot;things could have been worse&quot; approach  and sought out value in the aftermath of last week&#8217;s economic and earnings  reports.&nbsp; Some analysts believe that a  stronger dollar will mean the end to the rally in commodities, and investors  (hedge funds) will take some related profits and move back into stocks.</p>
<p>Despite all the recent  negativity, the <strong><a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=983582">Dow  Jones Industrial Average</a></strong> surged more than 500 points in April, and the <strong><a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=626307">Standard &amp; Poor&#8217;s 500  Index</a></strong> and <strong><a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=13756934">Nasdaq  Composite Index</a></strong> both rose about 5% &#8211; hardly the recessionary results  many had been anticipating.</p>
<h3>Economically  Speaking</h3>
<h2>Weekly Economic Calendar</h2>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="450">
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>Date</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>Release</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>Comments </strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>April 29</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Consumer    Confidence (04/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Lowest level in 5 years </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>April 30</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>GDP (1st    qtr)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Slow growth, but NOT recessionary </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Fed Policy Meeting    Statement</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>25 bps cut may be last for a while</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>May 1</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Initial Jobless    Claims (04/26/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Surprisingly high increase in benefits claims </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Personal    Spending/Income (03/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Lackluster showing for 4th straight month </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Construction    Spending (03/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Much greater than expected decline</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>ISM &#8211; Manu (04/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Continued sector contraction </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>May 2</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Unemployment Rate    (04/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Slight improvement from March</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Non-farm Payroll    Additions (04/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Fewer than anticipated job losses </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Factory Orders    (03/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Rebounded after consecutive monthly losses </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>The Week Ahead</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>&nbsp;</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>May 5</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>ISM &#8211; Services    (04/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>May 7</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Consumer Credit    (03/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>May 8</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Initial Jobless    Claims (05/03/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>May 9</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Balance of Trade    (03/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>After noting that the &quot;<em>substantial  easing of monetary policy to date, combined with ongoing measures to foster  market liquidity, should help to promote moderate growth over time and to  mitigate risks to economic activity,</em>&quot; the Fed may now be embarking  upon a much-needed summer vacation given that <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/01/with-seven-rate-cuts-since-fall-could-the-fed-be-exporting-stagflation-to-europe/">last  Wednesday&#8217;s quarter-point interest-rate cut</a> appears to be its last move for  awhile.</p>
<p>After all, Team Bernanke &amp; Co. has lowered the benchmark Federal  Funds rate seven times since mid-September; it now stands at 2.0%, the lowest  level since late 2004.</p>
<p>Additionally, the Fed had recently engaged in a few other &quot;creative&quot;  actions at a time investors were growing quite nervous about the ever-expanding  credit crisis.&nbsp; For now, the central bank  seems content to sit back and watch, while the stimuli or &quot;methods to its  madness&quot; begin to take effect.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Though consumer confidence fell to a five-year low in April, analysts  may want to revise their recessionary forecasts for another quarter.&nbsp; With many anticipating negative economic  growth in the 1st quarter, <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/01/gdp-holds-steady-at-0.6-in-the-first-quarter/">gross  domestic product GDP rose by 0.6%</a>.</p>
<p>Remember, by true definition, a recession is marked by two consecutive  quarterly contractions, so barring a revision in the months ahead, the 2nd  quarter now becomes key for the potential emergence of any real downturn.&nbsp; Suddenly, some &quot;experts&quot; are questioning that  likelihood.&nbsp; While the Labor Department  revealed a fourth straight month of job losses in April, the results were not  nearly as bad as many had predicted (only 20,000 non-farm jobs were lost, vs.  the 70,000 that had been expected). Likewise, the unemployment rate actually  fell to 5.0% (from 5.1% in March), another promising sign for workers.&nbsp; </p>
<p>On the manufacturing front, factory orders rebounded after consecutive  monthly declines and climbed by 1.4% in March.&nbsp;  The ISM Index revealed slight sector contraction, though again many  economists were expecting a far worse reading.&nbsp;  While a weaker than expected construction spending report depicted that  housing is not showing any real signs of rebounding, some analysts believe the  Fed has laid the groundwork for recovery.&nbsp; </p>
<p><strong><u>News and Related Story Links:</u></strong></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>The Motley Fool</strong>: <a href="http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2008/05/01/whats-next-for-time-warner-cable.aspx"><br />
  What&#8217;s       Next for Time Warner Cable?</a></p>
</li>
<li><strong>Money Morning       News Analysis</strong>: <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/29/mars-teams-up-with-berkshire-hathaway-and-warren-buffett-in-23-billion-buyout-of-wrigley/"><br />
  Mars       Teams up With Berkshire Hathaway and Warren Buffett in $23 Billion Buyout       of Wrigley</a>. </p>
</li>
<li><strong>Money Morning       News</strong>: <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/01/gdp-holds-steady-at-0.6-in-the-first-quarter/"><br />
  GDP       Holds Steady at 0.6% in the First Quarter</a>. </p>
</li>
<li><strong>Money Morning       News Analysis</strong>: <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/01/with-seven-rate-cuts-since-fall-could-the-fed-be-exporting-stagflation-to-europe/"><br />
    With       Seven Rate Cuts Since Fall, Could the Fed Be Exporting Stagflation to       Europe?</a> </p>
</li>
<li><strong>Fidelity.com</strong>: <a href="http://content.members.fidelity.com/Inside_Fidelity/fullStory/1,,7577,00.html"><br />
  Millionaires       Expect Beginning Of Economic Recovery Just A Year Away, According To       Fidelity Survey</a><strong>.</strong> 
  </li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/05/05/this-weeks-profit-reports-could-render-final-verdict-on-first-quarter-earnings-season/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fed Will Grab Headlines This Week With &#8220;Last Hurrah&#8221; Interest-Rate Cut; Key GDP Stats Also Anticipated</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/28/fed-will-grab-headlines-this-week-with-last-hurrah-interest-rate-cut-key-gdp-stats-also-anticipated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/28/fed-will-grab-headlines-this-week-with-last-hurrah-interest-rate-cut-key-gdp-stats-also-anticipated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 11:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Patalon III</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Essay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Fed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Patalon III]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/28/fed-will-grab-headlines-this-week-with-last-hurrah-interest-rate-cut-key-gdp-stats-also-anticipated/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By  William Patalon III
  Executive  Editor
  Money  Morning/The Money Map Report
U.S. Federal Reserve  policymakers will likely cut its key interest rate to 2.0% from 2.25% this Wednesday,  which would mark the seventh such move since the central bank launched its  rate-reduction campaign in mid-September.
But if the central [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>By  William Patalon III</strong><br />
  <strong>Executive  Editor</strong><br />
  <strong>Money  Morning/The Money Map Report</strong></p>
<p>U.S. Federal Reserve  policymakers will likely cut its key interest rate to 2.0% from 2.25% this Wednesday,  which would mark the seventh such move since the central bank launched its  rate-reduction campaign in mid-September.</p>
<p>But if the central bank does  pare short-term interest rates, it&#8217;s likely to be the last such move in awhile;  the Fed will take a break and give its rate cuts a chance to work their way  through the U.S. economic system.</p>
<p>Despite an  active-economic-calendar schedule this week &#8211; which includes a report on  first-quarter gross-domestic product, and several other statistics that could  confirm that the U.S. economy is entrenched in a recession &#8211; the Fed&#8217;s  machinations should dominate this week&#8217;s headlines, given that the central  bank&#8217;s interest-rate-setting arm is set to meet Tuesday and Wednesday.</p>
<p>Any announcements about interest  rates will be made at 2:15 p.m. Wednesday. Experts  also say that whatever the Fed says about its expectations will be just as  important as what it actually does to the benchmark Federal Funds rate.</p>
<p>  &quot;I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s  any question that they&#8217;ll cut [a quarter-percentage point] off the rate,&quot;  David Rosenberg, chief economist for Merrill Lynch &amp; Co. Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=mer&#038;hl=en">MER</a>), told <strong><em>The  International Herald Tribune</em></strong>. &quot;The real question is what they say about  the future. It won&#8217;t be an &#8216;all clear&#8217; signal. But they&#8217;ll find a way to tell  the markets that they&#8217;ve done enough for now, simply put.&quot;<br />
  Not everyone agrees.</p>
<p>  &quot;There is no reason  why the Fed should be cutting rates right now,&quot; Richard Yamarone, director  of economic research at Argus Research Corp., <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid=%7b6A1A6095-CF18-4915-A7BD-806C20BCAE44%7d">told <strong><em>MarketWatch.com</em></strong></a>.</p>
<p>  Yamarone may be thinking back to  some of the public comments certain of the central bankers themselves have been  making.</p>
<p>  Back on April 18, Fed officials  hinted that they would be reluctant to cut the benchmark Federal Funds rate yet  again, given that the slumping U.S. economy also faced a major inflationary  threat. Indeed, Philadelphia Fed President Charles Plosser warned against  believing that interest-rate cuts were &quot;the solution to most, if not all,  economic ills.&quot;</p>
<p>  Plosser is one of the Fed&#8217;s major  anti-inflation hawks At the time, Plosser was merely the latest in a string of  policy-makers to warn about the rising risks of inflation, essentially  suggesting that another rate cut would probably be a very tough sell.</p>
<p>  In a speech at Drexel University&#8217;s  LeBow College of Business in Philadelphia, Plosser said real interest rates  were now at &quot;an accommodative level, meaning borrowing costs were low enough to  start boosting the U.S. economy&#8217;s growth rate back toward its normal historical  norm, <strong><em><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSN1528457320080418?sp=true">Reuters reported</a></em></strong>.</p>
<p>The futures market is projecting a Fed Funds rate of 1.75% by the  end of this year. Here&#8217;s <a href="http://www.money-rates.com/fed.htm">a look at  the futures market&#8217;s month-by-month expectations</a> for short-term borrowing  costs for the remainder of 2008:</p>
<ul>
<li>April: 2.17%.</li>
<li>May: 1.89%.</li>
<li>June: 1.85%</li>
<li>July 1.79%.</li>
<li>August 2008: 1.76%.</li>
<li>September 2008: 1.76%.</li>
<li>October 2008: 1.77%.</li>
<li>December 2008: 1.73%.</li>
</ul>
<p>The worries about inflation that Plosser and other inflation hawks  have are very real. And those concerns don&#8217;t exist solely on our side of the  Atlantic. The low U.S. rates are contributing to a weakness in the greenback  that&#8217;s sent the American currency to record lows against most other key world  currencies. That&#8217;s fueling a massive run-up in the cost of energy and  food-related imports &#8211; and that&#8217;s inflationary for U.S. buyers.</p>
<p>  But it&#8217;s made U.S. exports very competitive abroad, acting almost  as a big discount for foreign buyers of such wares as Boeing Co. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABA">BA</a>) jetliners. In  fact, just last week Boeing surprised Wall Street with record earnings and  announced a record order backlog. And pan-European arch-rival <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=mer&#038;hl=en">Airbus SAS</a>., was  forced to announce a price increase on several&nbsp;  of its commercial airliners &#8211; because of rising steel prices <em><u>and</u></em> because of the falling dollar.</p>
<p>  French Economy Minister Christine Lagarde yesterday (Sunday) that the  gap between the U.S. and Eurozone interest rates was way too large, and called  for a change in rate policies on one side of the Atlantic, or the other.</p>
<p>  &quot;We are in a delicate situation where we have, on the one hand, an  American Federal (Reserve) which has a policy of very low rates and a European  Central Bank which has maintained high interest rates,&quot; Lagarde told <strong>LCI  Television</strong> and <strong>RTL Radio</strong>, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSL2743171220080427?sp=true">the  global wire service <strong><em>Reuters</em></strong> reported</a>. &quot;The differential in  interest between the two, it seems to me, is a little too big at the moment.&quot;</p>
<p>  Paris has long been a vocal critic of what French President Nicolas  Sarkozy has termed the ECB&#8217;s overly narrow focus on fighting inflation &#8211; and  has previously been criticized by Germany for meddling in the business of the  &quot;independent&quot; central bank.</p>
<p>  With Eurozone inflation running at about 3.6% &#8211; its highest rate since  the measure for that portion of the European market began in 1997, the European  Central Bank (ECB) has left its key refinancing interest rate unchanged at  4.0%, despite some very definite signs that Eurozone growth is slowing.</p>
<p>By comparison, the key U.S. interest rate is at 2.25%, though it may be  heading lower this week, and inflation is &quot;officially&quot; said to be at right  about 4% &#8211; though such experts as <strong><em>Money</em></strong> <strong><em>Morning</em></strong> Contributing Editor Martin Hutchinson <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/01/24/three-ways-to-profit-in-the-face-of-surging-inflation/">believe  the actual U.S. inflation rate is actually much higher</a>.</p>
<p>Although the FOMC meeting is  likely to top the economic the economic news of the week this week, the GDP  report will come in a fairly close second and will be nearly as closely watched  by some experts. The reason: Many eternal pessimists are expecting the report  to show negative growth during that three-month period.</p>
<p>Why is that important? Simple:  According to the <a href="http://www.nber.org/">National Bureau of Economic  Research</a> (NBER), two consecutive quarters of negative growth constitutes a  recession.</p>
<p>Most folks &quot;feel&quot; like the U.S.  economy is already in a recession. An official designation by the NBER &#8211; which  usually comes well after the fact &#8211; would simply make it official. </p>
<p>In the meantime, some of these  other reports this week could help serve as an interim and unofficial  &quot;confirmation&quot; of that dour diagnosis of the U.S. economy:</p>
<ul>
<li>The  health of the manufacturing sector will get a solid assessment via Thursday&#8217;s  release of the much-watched ISM survey and Friday&#8217;s report on factory orders.</li>
<li>The  all-important U.S. labor markets will get significant scrutiny via Thursday&#8217;s  report on initial jobless claims and Friday&#8217;s reports on the U.S. unemployment  rate and on non-farm payroll data.</li>
<li>We&#8217;ll  get a bit more insight into the psyche of the American consumer with Tuesday&#8217;s  report on consumer confidence for the month of April and Thursday&#8217;s report on  personal income and spending for the month of March.</li>
<li>And  we&#8217;ll get an overview of Corporate America&#8217;s health, as U.S. energy giants  Exxon Mobil Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AXOM">XOM</a>)  and Chevron Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ACVX">CVX</a>)  reveal how their profit reports have been boosted by record energy prices  [likely also prompting new calls for Congressional investigations into  allegations of price gouging].&nbsp; <strong>Starbucks  Corp</strong>. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=sbux&#038;hl=en">SBUX</a>)  will follow up recent warning with an actual announcement, while <strong>Office Depot Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AODP">ODP</a>)</strong> and <strong>Radio Shack</strong> <strong>Corp.</strong> (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=radio+shack">RSH</a>) will give  investors a look inside the world of retail.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Market Matters</h3>
<p>Two weeks ago, investors disregarded any  semblance of bad news (and lately, there has been plenty) and instead took the  stock indices to their highest levels in months. Last week, investors allowed  the earnings releases to guide their trading activities while awaiting the  Fed&#8217;s interest-rate decision and commentary.</p>
<p>So just what did the recent earnings  reports say about the current state of Corporate America?</p>
<p>Financialscontinue to stoke the negativity (no surprise there) with <strong>Bank of America Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABAC">BAC</a>)</strong>, investment  banker <strong>Credit Suisse Group (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ACS">CS</a>)</strong>, and bond  insurer <strong>Ambac Financial Group Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AABK">ABK</a>)</strong> reporting  more disappointing results.&nbsp; Drugmakers,  on the other hand, enjoyed a nice quarter with <strong>Merck &amp; Co. Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AMRK">MRK</a>) </strong>and <strong>Novartis</strong> <strong>AG</strong> (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ANVS">NVS</a>) beating  expectations.&nbsp; While a sluggish economy  can&#8217;t keep folks out of <strong>McDonald&#8217;s</strong> <strong>Corp.</strong> (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=mcd&#038;hl=en">MCD</a>) (as least  in its international markets), it does seem to be impacting coffee intake as <strong>Starbucks</strong> warned that this week&#8217;s  results (and those for all of 2008) will miss earlier projections.&nbsp; Of course, dire times lead to more nervous  smoking (and higher cigarette sales) as happy <strong>Philip Morris</strong> <strong>International Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3APM">PM</a>) shareholders found  out this quarter.&nbsp; While cost-conscious  folks stayed home and watched more DVDs, <strong>Netflix </strong>Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=netflix&#038;hl=en">NFLX</a>)  warned that future subscriber growth may be limited.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Both<strong> Delta Air Lines Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ADAL">DAL</a>)</strong> and <strong>Northwest Airlines Corp.</strong> (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ANWA">NWA</a>) posted sizable  losses on skyrocketing fuel costs, leading some analysts to question the wisdom  behind the proposed merger. While the world&#8217;s largest shipper, <strong>United Parcel Service Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AUPS">UPS</a>),</strong> experienced  a jump in profits, management expressed concern about the quarters to follow,  since consumers just don&#8217;t seem quite as interested in finding out &quot;<em>what Brown can do for you</em>.&quot;&nbsp; Even techs, which previously had been a  savings grace for the market, turned pessimistic this week.&nbsp; <strong>Apple  Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=aapl&#038;hl=en">AAPL</a>) </strong>and <strong>Texas Instruments</strong> <strong>Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ATXN">TXN</a>) reported decent  earnings, but warned about their respective outlooks.</p>
<p>Likewise, high-tech bellwether <strong>Microsoft Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=msft&#038;hl=en">MSFT</a>) </strong>disappointed  with its profit numbers, while investors wait with trepidation to see what  becomes of Microsoft&#8217;s bid for <strong>Yahoo!  Inc., (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=yhoo&#038;hl=en">YHOO</a>). </strong>Meanwhile, Yahoo beat &quot;The Street&#8217;s&quot; expectations. However, the three-week  deadline that Microsoft gave Yahoo to come to an agreement on its unsolicited  bid passed Saturday without any announcement from either side, leading to the  possibility that the battle for Yahoo is about to turn hostile, <strong><em><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid=%7b76D17FC1-83FB-4325-9970-0994FD539271%7d">MarketWatch.com  reported</a></em></strong>.</p>
<p><strong>ConocoPhillips  (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=cop&#038;hl=en">COP</a>) </strong>showed that record energy prices are not hurting  everyone, as the No. 3 U.S. oil company reported a 17% increase in  profits.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Transactions typically imply growing  confidence in corporate boardrooms as management finds the value in certain  acquisition targets.&nbsp; Last week, <strong>News Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ANWS.A&#038;hl=en&#038;meta=hl%3Den">NWS.A</a>) </strong><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSWEN523620080427">moved closer  to buying <strong><em>Newsday</em></strong> and giving  Rupert Murdock greater control over the New York press</a>.</p>
<p>Insurance giant <strong><a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=5697286">Liberty Mutual  Holding Co. Inc</a>.</strong> agreed to buy <strong>SAFECO  Corp. </strong>(<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ASAF">SAF</a>) <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/liberty-mutual-buy-safeco-62/story.aspx?guid=%7BCE9CFE4E-2B6E-4079-84D8-19C8D443C074%7D&#038;dist=msr_26">in  a $6.2 billion deal</a> that will create the<strong> </strong>5th-largest property and casualty firm.&nbsp; <strong>Triarc</strong> <strong>Cos. Inc</strong>. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ATRY">TRY</a>)  soon may be adding those terrific &quot;hot-and-juicy&quot; square burgers and addictive  Frosty drinks to its Arby&#8217;s roast-beef-sandwich menus as it looks to acquire <strong>Wendy&#8217;s International </strong>(<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AWEN">WEN</a>) in a deal valued  at $2.34 billion. And, of course, there&#8217;s still the Microsoft-Yahoo  proposal.</p>
<p>With a mixed week on the earnings front,  stocks traded relatively flat as investors took some profits from last week&#8217;s  newfound bullish sentiment, while still searching for a bargain or two.&nbsp; </p>
<p align="center">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="450">
<tr>
<td>
        <strong>Market/Index</strong> </td>
<td>
<p align="center"><strong>Year Close    (2007)</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="center"><strong>Qtr Close    (03/31/07)</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="center"><strong>Previous    Week</strong><br />
            <strong>(04/18/08)</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="center"><strong>Current    Week </strong><br />
            <strong>(04/25/08)</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="center"><strong>YTD Change</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Dow Jones Industrial </p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right">13,264.82<strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right">12,262.89 </p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right">12,849.36 </p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right"><strong>12,891.86</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="84" valign="bottom">
<p align="right"><strong>-2.81%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>NASDAQ</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right">2,652.28<strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right">2,279.10 </p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right">2,402.97 </p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right"><strong>2,422.93</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="84" valign="bottom">
<p align="right"><strong>-8.65%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>S&amp;P 500</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right">1,468.36<strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right">1,322.70 </p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right">1,390.33 </p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right"><strong>1,397.84</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="84" valign="bottom">
<p align="right"><strong>-4.80%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Russell 2000 </p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right">766.03<strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right">687.97 </p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right">721.07 </p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right"><strong>721.88</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="84" valign="bottom">
<p align="right"><strong>-5.76%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Fed Funds</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right">4.25%</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right">2.25%</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right">2.25%</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right"><strong>2.25%</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="84" valign="bottom">
<p align="right"><strong>-200 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>10 yr Treasury (Yield)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right">4.04%<strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right">3.43% </p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right">3.74%</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right"><strong>3.87%</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="right"><strong>-17 bps </strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h3>Economically Speaking</h3>
<p>For  many Fed-watchers, the prospect for another rate cut has been a foregone  conclusion.&nbsp; After all, central bank Chairman  Ben S. Bernanke and clan have let their creative juices flow [not to be  confused with the creative juices of those Wendy's hamburgers] over the past  few months; the Fed has tried everything from the aggressive rate-cutting  campaign to liquidity injections to arranging the buyout of The Bear Stearns  Cos. Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABSC">BSC</a>) by  JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co. Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=jpm&#038;hl=en">JPM</a>).</p>
<p>Suddenly,  some great prognosticators believe the Fed may be &quot;seven and done&quot; as they drop  the Federal Funds rate again (by a minimal quarter of a percentage point this  time around) &#8211; before going on a &quot;summer hiatus&quot; to give their earlier work the  time to take effect.</p>
<p>With  oil prices hovering around the (once unheard of) $120/barrel level, some  policymakers are sure to claim that inflation should be considered as critical  a concern as the sluggish housing market to the U.S. economy&#8217;s health. Indeed,  comments such as those of Philly Fed President Plosser make it clear that  inflation is already becoming an increasingly important consideration.</p>
<p>Additionally,  the European Central Bank seems content to keep its lending rate at 4%, so  further Fed actions will continue to have devastating impact on the value of  the dollar.</p>
<p>The  economic calendar was relatively light last week as analysts rested up for this  week&#8217;s vast array of important data. After a surprising climb (better known now  as an aberration) in February, existing home sales plunged again in March,  while new homes sales fell to their lowest level in more than 16 years.</p>
<p>Furthermore,  the median price of a new home dropped by more than 13% last month, the largest  such decline in almost four decades.</p>
<p>Durable  goods orders fell in March, as well, although once the volatile transportation  sector was removed from the equation, the results did not look half bad.&nbsp; </p>
<p>We  hope that investors and analysts got plenty of rest over the weekend to get  ready for the bustle of economic reports due throughout this week. Talk of  recession should resume with the release of the first-quarter GDP, which many  eternal pessimists believe will show negative growth during that three-month  stretch.</p>
<p><strong>Weekly Economic Calendar</strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="450">
<tr>
<td>
        <strong>Date</strong> </td>
<td>
<p><strong>Release</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>Comments </strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>April    22</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Existing Home Sales (03/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Decline    implied that rise in February was an aberration </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>April    24</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Durable Goods Orders    (03/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Slide    in transportation orders offset other gains </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Initial Jobless Claims    (04/19/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Large,    unexpected drop in benefits claims </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>New Home Sales (03/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Worst    showing in 16.5 years </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>The Week Ahead</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>&nbsp;</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>April    29</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Consumer Confidence (04/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>April    30</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>GDP (1st qtr)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Fed Policy Meeting    Statement</p>
</td>
<td>
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>May    1</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Initial Jobless Claims    (04/26/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Personal Spending/Income    (03/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Construction Spending    (03/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>ISM &#8211; Manu (04/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>May    2</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Unemployment Rate (04/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Nonfarm Payroll Additions    (04/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Factory Orders (03/08)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><strong><u>News and Related Story Notes</u></strong><u>:</u></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Money-rates.com</strong>: <a href="http://www.money-rates.com/fed.htm"><br />
  Federal       Reserve Update</a>.<strong></strong></p>
</li>
<li><strong>RightLine.net</strong>: <br />
  <a href="http://www.rightline.net/calendar/FOMC-Calendar.html">Calendar       of Federal Reserve Meetings (FOMC Calendar) 2008</a>.</p>
</li>
<li><strong>Reuters: </strong><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSN1528457320080418?sp=true"><br />
  Fed       officials cool on need for rate cuts</a>.<strong></strong></p>
</li>
<li><strong>International Herald Tribune: <br />
  </strong><a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/04/27/business/Fed.php">Fed       expected to cut rates, but focus will be on its words<strong>.</strong></a><strong></strong></p>
</li>
<li><strong>Reuters: </strong><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSL2743171220080427?sp=true"><br />
  Gap       between Fed, ECB rates too big-France&#8217;s Laga</a>rde.<strong></strong></p>
</li>
<li><strong>MarketWatch.com</strong>:<br />
    <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/microsoft-deadline-yahoo-deal-passes/story.aspx?guid=%7BA5F27AFE-E13E-4DCB-BAD5-D1453DBBFFD1%7D&#038;dist=msr_1">Microsoft deadline for Yahoo deal passes       in silence</a>.</p>
</li>
<li><strong>Money Morning Research       Report</strong>: <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/01/24/three-ways-to-profit-in-the-face-of-surging-inflation/"><br />
  Three       Ways to Profit in the Face of Surging Inflation</a>.</p>
</li>
<li><strong>MarketWatch.com</strong>: <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid=%7b6A1A6095-CF18-4915-A7BD-806C20BCAE44%7d"><br />
  The       Fed: Fed rate cut not a sure thing</a><strong>.</strong></p>
</li>
<li><strong>Reuters</strong>:&nbsp; <br />
  <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSWEN523620080427">Zuckerman       submits $580 mln Newsday bid: Source</a>.</p>
</li>
<li><strong>MarketWatch.com</strong>: <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/liberty-mutual-buy-safeco-62/story.aspx?guid=%7BCE9CFE4E-2B6E-4079-84D8-19C8D443C074%7D&#038;dist=msr_26"><br />
  Liberty       Mutual to buy Safeco for $6.2 billion</a>.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/28/fed-will-grab-headlines-this-week-with-last-hurrah-interest-rate-cut-key-gdp-stats-also-anticipated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Midday Market Update: Stocks Lower on Disappointing  Earnings</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/22/midday-market-update-stocks-lower-on-disappointing-earnings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/22/midday-market-update-stocks-lower-on-disappointing-earnings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/22/midday-market-update-stocks-lower-on-disappointing-earnings/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Jennifer Yousfi
  Managing Editor
Another batch of earnings announcements sent shares lower,  as weak results from non-financial firms fueled investor concerns that economic  weakness is spreading to other industries.
At midday in New York, the blue-chip Dow Jones Industrial  Average Index was down 76.86 points (-0.60%), to trade at 12,748.16. The  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>By Jennifer Yousfi<br />
  Managing Editor</strong></p>
<p>Another batch of earnings announcements sent shares lower,  as weak results from non-financial firms fueled investor concerns that economic  weakness is spreading to other industries.</p>
<p>At midday in New York, the blue-chip <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=983582">Dow Jones Industrial  Average Index</a> was down 76.86 points (-0.60%), to trade at 12,748.16. The  tech-laden <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=13756934">Nasdaq  Composite Index</a> shed 17.41 points (-0.72%), to reach 2,390.63. And the  broader <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=626307">Standard &amp;  Poor&#8217;s 500 Index</a> decreased 8.41 points (-0.61%), to hit 1,379.76.<strong> </strong></p>
<p><b>Story continues below&#8230;</b></p>
<table align="center" style="background:#E0E7C2">
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Sign up right now, and we&#8217;ll send you an important new report for free: &#8220;The Three Best Investments in Asia.&#8221;</font></strong>
				</p>
<form method="post" action="http://www.aweber.com/scripts/addlead.pl">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_web_form_id" value="163867">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_split_id" value="">
<input type="hidden" name="unit" value="money-morning">
<input type="hidden" name="redirect" value="http://www.oxfonline.com/MMR/ROG0108mm.html?pub=MMR&#038;code=WMMRJ405">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_redirect_onlist" value="">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_adtracking" value="X300HJG4">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_message" value="1">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_required" value="from">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_forward_vars" value="0">
<form method="post" action="http://www.aweber.com/scripts/addlead.pl">
            <center> <img src="http://www.moneymorning.com/images2/MMSignUp.gif" /><br />
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><br />
      </font> </p>
<input type="submit" name="submit" value="Subscribe Now!" onClick="var s=s_gi(s_account); s.linkTrackVars='eVar2,eVar10,events'; s.linkTrackEvents='event3'; s.events='event3'; s.eVar10 ='MIdday 422'; s.tl(this,'o','Subscribe to Newsletter');" />
<input type="text" name="from" value="" size="20" />
</center><br />
</form>
<p></font></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Most sectors were down, with the energy sector (up 0.43%)  and the basic materials sector (up 0.08%) posting the only gains. The consumer  cyclical sector (down 1.75%) and the technology sector (down 1.12%) had the  largest declines.</p>
<p>&quot;Earnings and earnings estimates are coming down,&quot; Mike  Ryan, the New York-based head of wealth management research for the Americas at  UBS Financial Services Inc., which oversees about $734 billion, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&#038;sid=aToVDbyWcnoo&#038;refer=home">said  in an interview on <strong><em>Bloomberg Television</em></strong></a>. &quot;We&#8217;re likely to see  stocks continuing to be under pressure&quot; in the first half of 2008.</p>
<p>Despite a 24% increase in profit,  McDonald&#8217;s Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=mcd">MCD</a>)  slumped after it announced a slight decrease in same-store sales for March.</p>
<p>Shares of UnitedHealth Group Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AUNH">UNH</a>) and Texas  Instruments Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ATXN">TXN</a>)  were also down sharply after announcing first quarter results.</p>
<p>In overseas markets earlier today, Japan&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikkei_225">Nikkei 225 Index</a> lost 1.1%  with a decrease of 148.73 points to close at 13,547.82. Hong Kong&#8217;s blue-chip <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hang_Seng_Index">Hang Seng Index</a> gained  almost 1% with a 217.48-point climb, to 24,939.15.</p>
<p>European  bourses were down, with the Paris-based <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAC40">CAC40</a>, London&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FTSE_100_Index">FTSE 100</a>, Madrid&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBEX_35">IBEX 35</a> and the Frankfurt-based <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DAX">DAX</a> all posting losses.</p>
<p>At midday, the dollar had lost ground against the euro (down  0.457%) and the pound sterling (down 0.812%), but gained ground against the yen  (up 0.204%).</p>
<p><strong><u>News and Related Story Links:</u></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Bloomberg:</strong><br />
  <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&#038;sid=aToVDbyWcnoo&#038;refer=home">U.S.  Stocks Retreat; Texas Instruments, UnitedHealth Decline</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>MarketWatch:</strong><br />
  <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/us-stocks-drop-earnings-weigh/story.aspx?guid=%7BAE8BA359%2D589A%2D4CA9%2DA3D1%2D6F1657FF949F%7D">U.S.  stocks decline amid flood of earnings reports</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Reuters:</strong><br />
  <a href="http://www.reuters.com/finance/markets">Stock Market News &amp; Quotes</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/22/midday-market-update-stocks-lower-on-disappointing-earnings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Midday Market Update: Stocks Slump on Financial Fears</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/21/midday-market-update-stocks-slump-on-financial-fears/</link>
		<comments>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/21/midday-market-update-stocks-slump-on-financial-fears/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/21/midday-market-update-stocks-slump-on-financial-fears/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Jennifer Yousfi
  Managing Editor
U.S. shares declined as poor earnings from two banks led  investors to believe financial firms have yet to recover from the subprime  mortgage crisis. 
At midday in New York, the blue-chip Dow Jones Industrial  Average Index was down 77.02 points (-0.60%), to trade at 12,772.34. The  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>By Jennifer Yousfi<br />
  Managing Editor</strong></p>
<p>U.S. shares declined as poor earnings from two banks led  investors to believe financial firms have yet to recover from the subprime  mortgage crisis. </p>
<p>At midday in New York, the blue-chip <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=983582">Dow Jones Industrial  Average Index</a> was down 77.02 points (-0.60%), to trade at 12,772.34. The  tech-laden <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=13756934">Nasdaq  Composite Index</a> shed 5.89 points (-0.25%), to reach 2,397.08. And the  broader <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=626307">Standard &amp;  Poor&#8217;s 500 Index</a> decreased 8.67 points (-0.62%), to hit 1,381.66.<strong> </strong></p>
<p><b>Story continues below&#8230;</b></p>
<table align="center" style="background:#E0E7C2">
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Sign up right now, and we&#8217;ll send you an important new report for free: &#8220;The Three Best Investments in Asia.&#8221;</font></strong>
				</p>
<form method="post" action="http://www.aweber.com/scripts/addlead.pl">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_web_form_id" value="163867">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_split_id" value="">
<input type="hidden" name="unit" value="money-morning">
<input type="hidden" name="redirect" value="http://www.oxfonline.com/MMR/ROG0108mm.html?pub=MMR&#038;code=WMMRJ405">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_redirect_onlist" value="">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_adtracking" value="X300HJG4">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_message" value="1">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_required" value="from">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_forward_vars" value="0">
<form method="post" action="http://www.aweber.com/scripts/addlead.pl">
            <center> <img src="http://www.moneymorning.com/images2/MMSignUp.gif" /><br />
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><br />
      </font> </p>
<input type="submit" name="submit" value="Subscribe Now!" onClick="var s=s_gi(s_account); s.linkTrackVars='eVar2,eVar10,events'; s.linkTrackEvents='event3'; s.events='event3'; s.eVar10 ='midday 421'; s.tl(this,'o','Subscribe to Newsletter');" />
<input type="text" name="from" value="" size="20" />
</center><br />
</form>
<p></font></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Most sectors were down, with the consumer cyclical sector  (up 0.51%) and the energy sector (up 0.70%) posting the only gains. The  transportation sector (down 1.01%) and the financial sector (down 0.97%) had  the largest declines.</p>
<p>&quot;Every quarter they predict the worst is behind us, we&#8217;ve  taken the writeoffs, it&#8217;s all rosy from here,&quot; Whitney Tilson, founder of New  York-based hedge fund manager T2 Partners LLC, which oversees about $100  million, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&#038;sid=a5iJmDIbnrZ4&#038;refer=home">said  in a <strong><em>Bloomberg Television</em></strong></a> interview. &quot;Every quarter they&#8217;ve  been wrong. I think they are again here.&quot;</p>
<p>Bank of America Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=bac">BAC</a>) announced a 77% decline  in first-quarter earnings to $1.21 billion or 23 cents per share. Shares were  down over 2% at midday.</p>
<p>Ohio-based National City Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=ncc&#038;hl=en">NCC</a>) stock plunged  over 25% after <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120878432510831163.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">a  report appeared in <strong><em>The Wall Street Journal</em></strong></a> that the bank  needs to raise $7 billion in capital to bolster liquidity reserves and reduce  its dividend to just 1 cent per share. </p>
<p>In overseas markets earlier today, Japan&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikkei_225">Nikkei 225 Index</a> gained 1.6%  to hit its highest close in two months with an increase of 220.10 points to  close at 13,696.55. Hong Kong&#8217;s  blue-chip <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hang_Seng_Index">Hang Seng  Index</a> rose over 2% with a 523.89-point drop, to 24,721.67, an 11-week  closing high.</p>
<p>European  bourses were down, with the Paris-based <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAC40">CAC40</a>, London&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FTSE_100_Index">FTSE 100</a>, Madrid&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBEX_35">IBEX 35</a> and the Frankfurt-based <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DAX">DAX</a> all posting losses.</p>
<p>At midday, the dollar had lost ground against the euro (down  0.792%) and the yen (down 0.569%), but gained ground against the pound sterling  (up 0.570%).</p>
<p><strong><u>News and Related Story Links:</u></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Bloomberg:</strong><br />
  <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&#038;sid=a5iJmDIbnrZ4&#038;refer=home">U.S.  Stocks Drop on Earnings Concern; Bank of America Retreats</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>MarketWatch:</strong><br />
  <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/us-stocks-lower-bank-america/story.aspx?guid=%7BF3AF984B%2D557E%2D4E23%2D934C%2DBFE626F2D8FD%7D">U.S.  stocks lower on Bank of America miss</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Reuters:</strong><br />
  <a href="http://www.reuters.com/finance/markets">Stock Market News &amp; Quotes</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/21/midday-market-update-stocks-slump-on-financial-fears/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Step or False Signal? Could Last Week&#8217;s Surge in Stocks Signal a Rebound Ahead?</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/21/first-step-or-false-signal-could-last-weeks-surge-in-stocks-signal-a-rebound-ahead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/21/first-step-or-false-signal-could-last-weeks-surge-in-stocks-signal-a-rebound-ahead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Patalon III</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Essay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Patalon III]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/21/first-step-or-false-signal-could-last-weeks-surge-in-stocks-signal-a-rebound-ahead/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By William Patalon III
  Executive Editor
    Money Morning/The Money Map Report
It&#8217;s  earnings season again. But with an odd twist. 
You see, most investors realized  that earnings season would be dismal; so when the results came in (pretty much)  as expected, many investors seemed to find that the news [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>By William Patalon III<br />
  Executive Editor</strong><br />
    <strong>Money Morning/The Money Map Report</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s  earnings season again. But with an odd twist.<strong> </strong></p>
<p>You see, most investors realized  that earnings season would be dismal; so when the results came in (pretty much)  as expected, many investors seemed to find that the news (especially among  financials) was not worse and went on a buying spree.</p>
<p>By watching the trading &quot;tape,&quot;  you almost could &quot;hear&quot; what investors were thinking:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co.</strong> (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:JPM">JPM</a>) announces <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/16/jpmorgan-chase-posts-50-profit-drop-predicts-weak-markets-through-remainder-of-year-or-longer/">a  50% decline in first-quarter profits, and says markets will remain weak through  the rest of this year and perhaps into next</a>: No problem. As bad as the  results were, they were actually better than Wall Street expected.</li>
<li><strong>Citigroup Inc</strong>. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AC">C</a>) says it <a href="file:///E:\Money%20Morning%20News%20Files%20(Week%20Ending%20April%2025,%202008)\Citigroup%20Misses%20Earnings%20Estimates%20and%20Announces%209,000%20Job%20Cuts">lost  $5.1 billion on a 48% decline in revenue and will slash 9,000 jobs</a> &#8211; that&#8217;s  great! </li>
<li><strong>Merrill Lynch &amp;</strong> <strong>Co. Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:MER">MER</a>)  posts its third straight quarterly loss, and says it is going to have to slash  3,000 jobs. Again, the investors seemed to be saying: No sweat. </li>
</ul>
<p>And those were just the financials. <strong>Intel Corp.</strong> (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=intc">INTC</a>)  posted lower quarterly earnings, even after issuing a warning a few weeks  earlier. Even so, the results were better than anticipated. The <strong>Coca Cola Co. (</strong><a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=ko&#038;hl=en">KO</a>)<strong> </strong>experienced lackluster domestic  results.</p>
<p>On their face, these earnings just didn&#8217;t  look so hot overall.</p>
<p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/04/20/markets/weekahead.ap/index.htm?postversion=2008042015">So  how did the U.S. stock markets respond: With great strength</a>.</p>
<p>In fact, U.S. stocks reached their  highest levels in nearly three months &#8211; and energy stocks in the Standard &amp;  Poor&#8217;s 500 Index had their biggest gains this decade &#8211; on a mix of better-than-expected  earnings, soaring oil prices and new record highs in key commodities.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=983582">Dow Jones Industrial  Average</a> soared 4.25% for the week. The <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=626307">Standard &amp; Poor&#8217;s 500  Index</a> jumped 4.31%. And the <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=13756934">Nasdaq Composite Index</a> rocketed a stunning 4.96% for the week.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=RTY%3AIND">Russell  2000 Index</a> of small-cap stocks increased 4.8%.</p>
<p>    <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=CMCIPI3M%3AIND">Energy</a> stocks in the <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=626307">Standard  &amp; Poor&#8217;s 500 Index</a> had the biggest gain this decade after crude oil  surpassed $116 a barrel in New York. The profit report for <strong>Google Inc</strong>. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=intc">GOOG</a>) sent shares of the  Internet search-engine giant up 20% Friday, its biggest single-day climb since  it went public in 2004. Intel&#8217;s report pushed tech stocks to their largest  single-week gain since August 2006.</p>
<p>  Profit exceeded analysts&#8217; estimates at 58 of 101 companies in the S&amp;P  500 that have released first-quarter results so far, even as earnings fell an  average 37% from a year earlier, according to <strong><em>Bloomberg</em></strong> data.  Overall, earnings are forecast to decline 13.7% in the first quarter, marking  the third straight decrease. </p>
<p>  JPMorgan Chief Executive Officer <a href="http://stocks.us.reuters.com/stocks/OfficersDirectorsDetails.asp?rpc=66&#038;symbol=JPM&#038;officerID=506000">Jamie  Dimon</a> said the credit crisis is nearing an end.</p>
<p>  &quot;It&#8217;s been quite an exciting market,&quot; John Carey, who helps oversee $13  billion at <strong><a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=4477359">Pioneer  Investment Management USA Inc</a></strong>., in Boston, told <strong><em>Bloomberg News</em></strong>.  &quot;Earnings are the big story, and you have some companies surprising and being  rewarded in the market.&quot;</p>
<p>  Stocks tend to be a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leading_economic_indicator">leading market  indicator</a>, in effect, anticipating future events.</p>
<p>  As part of that, markets tend to rally during the depths of a recession,  anticipating an economic recovery even at a time when the outlook still seems  to be as dire as can be.</p>
<p>  The question to ask right now is this: Is last week&#8217;s rally &#8211; coming amid a  bevy of disappointing earnings or outright corporate losses &#8211; merely an  aberration, as in a pent-up burst of buying that&#8217;s following after weeks of  bearish selling?</p>
<p>  Or was last week&#8217;s rally a signal &#8211; perhaps <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/23256524">telling investors that the recession  many experts believe the U.S. economy</a> is already well into is on its way  out?</p>
<p>Only time will tell.</p>
<h3>Market Matters</h3>
<p>It was another  tough week for the airlines: Given that, it&#8217;s clear the <strong>$</strong>17 billion <strong>Delta  Air Lines (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ADAL">DAL</a>)/Northwest  Airlines Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ANWA">NWA</a>)</strong> merger deal may have been the first of many similar transactions that will  change the landscape of an industry struggling through the twin challenges of  mountainous fuel costs and a weak economy. With oil surging past the $116 a  barrel level and gasoline moving ever closer to the $4 a gallon level on supply  concerns, Republican presidential hopeful John McCain proposed a &quot;gas-tax  holiday&quot; that would suspend the federal gas tax of 18-plus cents a gallon for  the summer-driving months.</p>
<p>Did anyone even notice?</p>
<p>Meanwhile, <strong>Blockbuster Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABBI">BBI</a>)</strong> expressed  confidence that consumers ultimately will move out of their doldrums and back  to the malls as the company proceeded with its potential $1.35 billion bid for  ailing consumer-electronics retailer <strong>Circuit  City Stores Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABBI">CC</a>)</strong>.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Equity  investors digested the earnings data, disregarded the surging energy prices,  put away their tax records for another year, and went bargain hunting for  undervalued stocks.&nbsp; When the dust had  settled, each of the major indices climbed more than 1.75% on Friday alone,  rose over 4% for the week, and hit levels not seen in two months.</p>
<p>Even  so, the Dow is down 3.13% year to date. The S&amp;P has skidded 5.31%. And the  Nasdaq is down 9.4%.</p>
<p>Of  course, fixed income felt the brunt of the shift in asset allocation as the  yield on the 10-year Treasury bond climbed to around 3.75%.</p>
<p>With  positive stock-price momentum, the potential for a new round of corporate deal  making that could further stoke bullish sentiment, tax refunds on the way for  some, and gas-price relief in time for the all-important summer driving season,  there seems to be a lot to be optimistic about as the arm weather months return  to us here on the East Coast.</p>
<p><b>Story continues below&#8230;</b></p>
<table align="center" style="background:#E0E7C2">
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Sign up right now, and we&#8217;ll send you an important new report for free: &#8220;The Three Best Investments in Asia.&#8221;</font></strong>
				</p>
<form method="post" action="http://www.aweber.com/scripts/addlead.pl">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_web_form_id" value="163867">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_split_id" value="">
<input type="hidden" name="unit" value="money-morning">
<input type="hidden" name="redirect" value="http://www.oxfonline.com/MMR/ROG0108mm.html?pub=MMR&#038;code=WMMRJ405">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_redirect_onlist" value="">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_adtracking" value="X300HJG4">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_message" value="1">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_required" value="from">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_forward_vars" value="0">
<form method="post" action="http://www.aweber.com/scripts/addlead.pl">
            <center> <img src="http://www.moneymorning.com/images2/MMSignUp.gif" /><br />
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><br />
      </font> </p>
<input type="submit" name="submit" value="Subscribe Now!" onClick="var s=s_gi(s_account); s.linkTrackVars='eVar2,eVar10,events'; s.linkTrackEvents='event3'; s.events='event3'; s.eVar10 ='wtw 421'; s.tl(this,'o','Subscribe to Newsletter');" />
<input type="text" name="from" value="" size="20" />
</center><br />
</form>
<p></font></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p align="center">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="450">
<tr>
<td valign="top">
        <strong>Market/Index</strong> </td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>Previous    Week</strong><br />
            <strong>(04/11/08)</strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>Current    Week </strong><br />
            <strong>(04/18/08)</strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>YTD Change</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<p>Dow Jones Industrial </p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right">12,325.42 </p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>12,849.36</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="right"><strong>-3.13%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<p>NASDAQ</p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right">2,290.24 </p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>2,402.97</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="right"><strong>-9.40%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<p>S&amp;P 500</p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right">1,332.83 </p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>1,390.33</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="right"><strong>-5.31%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<p>Russell 2000 </p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right">688.16 </p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>721.07</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="right"><strong>-5.87%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<p>Fed Funds</p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right">2.25%</p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>2.25%</strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="right"><strong>-200 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<p>10 yr Treasury (Yield)</p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right">3.47%</p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>3.74%</strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>-30 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h3>Economically Speaking</h3>
<p>While  investors clearly had their hands as they read through, analyzed and  prioritized the flood of earnings releases last week, at least the results  seemed to be generally upbeat. Economists, however, had to deal with an array  of &quot;not-so-rosy&quot; reports last week. While stock prices hint at a potential  economic rebound, economic reports hint at an inflationary resurgence that  could derail any rebound.</p>
<p>Retail  sales rebounded from a decline in February and <strong><em><u>surged</u></em></strong> 0.2%  in March. Then again, rising gas  prices accounted for most of the gains, as sales at service stations climbed by  1.1%.&nbsp; Core inflation &#8211; which  excludes volatile food-and-energy prices &#8211; rose by 0.2% within both the  wholesale (Producer Price Index, or PPI) and retail (Consumer Price Index, or  CPI) readings. Then again, the  volatile food-and-energy components (which now includes airline tickets)  continue to skyrocket and cannot be overlooked. While most &quot;experts&quot;  anticipated a decline, industrial production actually climbed by a <em><u>whopping</u></em> 0.3% in March on greater output from utilities.&nbsp; But manufacturing production struggled on a  weak auto sector.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Housing  moved a step closer to rebounding. <em>Then  again, home foreclosures have now increased by 57% from last year&#8217;s levels and  housing starts reflected the lowest pace of construction in 17 years</em>. The  U.S. Federal Reserve&#8217;s Beige Book noted a &quot;deteriorating&quot; economy, as  manufacturers and other businesses struggled with skyrocketing energy and  materials costs, and as consumer continue to sit on their wallets, fearing they  may become victim of the next round of layoffs.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re  still waiting to see what kind of positive spin the central bank can put on  that troubling Beige Book report.</p>
<p><strong>Weekly Economic Calendar</strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="450">
<tr>
<td valign="top">
        <strong>Date</strong> </td>
<td valign="top">
<p><strong>Release</strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p><strong>Comments </strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<p>April    14</p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p>Retail Sales (03/08)</p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p>Slight    gain primarily reflects higher gas prices </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<p>April    15</p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p>PPI (03/08)</p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p>Surge    in oil prices downplayed by mild core release </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<p>April    16</p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p>CPI (03/08)</p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p>Energy    increases offset by decline in clothing prices </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p>Housing Starts (03/08)</p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p>Lowest    level of construction in 17 years </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p>Industrial Production    (03/08)</p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p>Better    then expected increase in output </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p>Fed&#8217;s Beige Book </p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p>Deteriorating    economic health </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<p>April    17</p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p>Initial Jobless Claims    (04/12/08)</p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p>Higher    weekly benefit claims </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p>Leading Eco Indicators    (03/08)</p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p>Slight    increase after poor showing in February </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<p><strong>The Week Ahead</strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p><strong>&nbsp;</strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<p>April    23</p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p>Existing Home Sales (03/08)</p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<p>April    24</p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p>Durable Goods Orders    (03/08)</p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p>Initial Jobless Claims    (04/19/08)</p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p>New Home Sales (03/08)</p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
<p><strong><u>News and Related Story Links:</u></strong></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Money Morning       News Analysis</strong>: <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/16/jpmorgan-chase-posts-50-profit-drop-predicts-weak-markets-through-remainder-of-year-or-longer/"><br />
  JPMorgan       Chase Posts 50% Profit Drop, Predicts &quot;Weak&quot; Markets &quot;Through Remainder of       Year or Longer.&quot;</a></p>
</li>
<li><strong>Money       Morning News Analysis</strong>: <a href="file:///E:\Money%20Morning%20News%20Files%20(Week%20Ending%20April%2025,%202008)\Citigroup%20Misses%20Earnings%20Estimates%20and%20Announces%209,000%20Job%20Cuts"><br />
  Citigroup       Misses Earnings Estimates and Announces 9,000 Job Cuts</a>.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Money Morning News Analysis: </strong><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/17/merrill-misses-expectations-thains-mettle-to-be-tested/"><br />
  Merrill  Misses Expectations, Thain&#8217;s Mettle to be Tested.</a> </p>
</li>
<li><strong>CNNMoney.com</strong>: <br />
  <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/04/20/markets/weekahead.ap/index.htm?postversion=2008042015">After  Strong Rally, Stocks Face Earnings Test</a>. </p>
</li>
<li><strong>Bloomberg  News</strong>: <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&#038;sid=a8Hbo1TkM7Zg&#038;refer=home"><br />
  U.S.  Stocks Post Biggest Gain Since February on Earnings, Oil</a>. </p>
</li>
<li><strong>CNBC.com</strong>: <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/23256524"><br />
  UBS Says U.S. Economy Already in  Recession</a>. </p>
</li>
<li><strong>Wikipedia</strong>: <br />
  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leading_economic_indicator">Index  of Leading Indicators</a>.<strong>&nbsp;</strong></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/21/first-step-or-false-signal-could-last-weeks-surge-in-stocks-signal-a-rebound-ahead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Midday Market Update: U.S. Indices Reverse Gains</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/17/midday-market-update-u.s.-indices-reverse-gains/</link>
		<comments>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/17/midday-market-update-u.s.-indices-reverse-gains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/17/midday-market-update-u.s.-indices-reverse-gains/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Jennifer Yousfi
  Managing Editor
A fresh round of earnings reports dragged on U.S. stocks  today (Thursday).
At midday in New York, the blue-chip Dow Jones Industrial  Average Index was down 40.87 points (-0.32%), to trade at 12,578.40. The  tech-laden Nasdaq  Composite Index dropped 20.58 points (-0.88%), to reach 2,329.53. And the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>By Jennifer Yousfi<br />
  Managing Editor</strong></p>
<p>A fresh round of earnings reports dragged on U.S. stocks  today (Thursday).</p>
<p>At midday in New York, the blue-chip <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=983582">Dow Jones Industrial  Average Index</a> was down 40.87 points (-0.32%), to trade at 12,578.40. The  tech-laden <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=13756934">Nasdaq  Composite Index</a> dropped 20.58 points (-0.88%), to reach 2,329.53. And the  broader <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=626307">Standard &amp;  Poor&#8217;s 500 Index</a> decreased 6.31 points (-0.46%), to hit 1,358.40.<strong> </strong></p>
<p>Most sectors were down, with the transportation sector (down  1.31%) posting the largest decline.</p>
<p>&quot;Analysts are expecting a pretty  dour earnings season, and so are portfolio managers,&quot; Charles Reinhard,  director of portfolio strategy at Neuberger Berman, a unit of Lehman Brothers  Holdings Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=leh&#038;hl=en">LEH</a>)  that manages $129 billion, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&#038;sid=a1.ChQLzUzQE&#038;refer=home">said  in a <strong><em>Bloomberg Television</em></strong> interview</a>. &quot;The market is  discounting a lot.&quot;</p>
<p>Pharmaceutical firm Pfizer Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=pfizer">PFE</a>) dropped after  announcing a 19% drop in first quarter profits as generic drugs continue to  take a hit on the drug giant&#8217;s bottom line.</p>
<p>But blue-chip technology stock, International Business  Machines Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=ibm&#038;hl=en">IBM</a>),  gained after the Dow component announced a 26% increase in first quarter  profit, beating analyst estimates, and boosted its outlook for full-year 2008. </p>
<p>&quot;IBM beat revenue and earnings expectations substantially  with strength across the board,&quot; American Technology Research Analyst Shaw Wu <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/us-stocks-fall-after-mixed/story.aspx?guid=%7BD50D9E16%2D9B93%2D4C40%2D815A%2D7998126C3290%7D">told <strong><em>MarketWatch</em></strong></a>. &quot;We find this quite impressive in light of the  tough economic environment.&quot; </p>
<p>In overseas markets earlier today, Japan&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikkei_225">Nikkei 225 Index</a> gained 1.9%  with an increase of 252.17 points to close at 13,398.30. Hong Kong&#8217;s blue-chip <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hang_Seng_Index">Hang Seng Index</a> rose  1.6% with a 380.61-point increase, to close at 24,258.96.</p>
<p>In  Europe, most major bourses were down, with London&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FTSE_100_Index">FTSE 100</a>, Madrid&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBEX_35">IBEX 35</a> and the Frankfurt-based <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DAX">DAX</a> all posting losses. Only the  Paris-based <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAC40">CAC40</a> managed to  eke out a slight 7.04-point gain.</p>
<p>At midday, the dollar had gained ground against the euro (up  0.251%) and the yen (up 0.778%), but lost ground against the pound sterling  (down 0.811%).</p>
<p><strong><u>News and Related Story Links:</u></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Bloomberg:</strong><br />
  <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&#038;sid=a1.ChQLzUzQE&#038;refer=home">U.S.  Stocks Fall on Earnings, Manufacturing Slump; Pfizer Drops</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>MarketWatch:</strong><br />
  <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/us-stocks-fall-after-mixed/story.aspx?guid=%7BD50D9E16%2D9B93%2D4C40%2D815A%2D7998126C3290%7D">U.S.  stocks drop after mixed earnings, data</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Reuters:</strong><br />
  <a href="http://www.reuters.com/finance/markets">Stock Market News &amp; Quotes</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/17/midday-market-update-u.s.-indices-reverse-gains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Midday Market Update: U.S. Shares Gain on Fresh Round of Earnings</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/16/midday-market-update-u.s.-shares-gain-on-fresh-round-of-earnings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/16/midday-market-update-u.s.-shares-gain-on-fresh-round-of-earnings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/16/midday-market-update-u.s.-shares-gain-on-fresh-round-of-earnings/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Jennifer Yousfi
  Managing Editor
Stocks surged today (Wednesday),  on a round of earnings releases that met or exceeded Wall Street expectations.
&#34;On Friday, we had the bad surprise from [General Electric  Co. (GE)],&#34; Ken Tower, chief market strategist  at Covered Bridge Tactical, told MarketWatch. &#34;But this week, we&#8217;re seeing investors  pleasantly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>By Jennifer Yousfi<br />
  Managing Editor</strong></p>
<p>Stocks surged today (Wednesday),  on a round of earnings releases that met or exceeded Wall Street expectations.</p>
<p>&quot;On Friday, we had the bad surprise from [General Electric  Co. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=ge&#038;hl=en">GE</a>)],&quot; Ken Tower, chief market strategist  at Covered Bridge Tactical, <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/us-stocks-rally-upbeat-earnings/story.aspx?guid=%7BAFEAC9CA%2DF64E%2D4420%2DB46C%2DADF2A4AF7E6F%7D">told <strong><em>MarketWatch</em></strong></a>. &quot;But this week, we&#8217;re seeing investors  pleasantly surprised that earnings overall are not as bad, supporting the view  of a shallow economic decline instead of a more severe one.&quot;</p>
<p>At midday in New York, the blue-chip <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=983582">Dow Jones Industrial  Average Index</a> was up 179.37 points (1.45%), to trade at 12,541.84. The  tech-laden <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=13756934">Nasdaq  Composite Index</a> gained 48.43 points (2.12%), to reach 2,334.47. And the  broader <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=626307">Standard &amp;  Poor&#8217;s 500 Index</a> increased 18.68 points (1.40%), to hit 1,353.11.<strong> </strong></p>
<p>All sectors were up, with the basic materials sector (up  3.02%) and the technology sector (up 2.55%) posting the largest gains.</p>
<p>Intel Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=intc">INTC</a>) shares got a boost  from strong first quarter sales results in Asia and Europe. Sales increased  9.3% to $9.67 billion, beating analyst estimates.</p>
<p>&quot;These big market-share multinationals are still benefiting  from economic growth outside the U.S.,&quot; <a href="http://search.bloomberg.com/search?q=Keith+Wirtz&#038;site=wnews&#038;client=wnews&#038;proxystylesheet=wnews&#038;output=xml_no_dtd&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;oe=UTF-8&#038;filter=p&#038;getfields=wnnis&#038;sort=date:D:S:d1">Keith Wirtz</a>,  Cincinnati-based chief investment officer at Fifth Third Asset Management, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&#038;sid=ahjd9T6V0NNs&#038;refer=home">told <strong><em>Bloomberg News</em></strong></a>. &quot;It tells me conditions are not all that bad  on a global basis.&quot; </p>
<p>March industrial production also  rose slightly for the month with a 0.3% increase.</p>
<p>&quot;The manufacturing  sector may not be expanding but it is not contracting either, which is good  news,&quot; Joel Naroff, president and chief economist of <a href="http://www.naroffeconomics.com/">Naroff Economic Advisors</a>, said in a  note to clients today.</p>
<p>In overseas markets, Japan&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikkei_225">Nikkei 225 Index</a> gained 1.2%  with an increase of 155.55 points to close at 13,146.13. Hong Kong&#8217;s blue-chip <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hang_Seng_Index">Hang Seng Index</a> was  relatively flat with a 22.98-point drop, to close at 23,878.35.</p>
<p>The  FTSEurofirst 300 index of top European shares gained 1.6%. Other major European  bourses were up, with the Paris-based <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAC40">CAC40</a>, London&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FTSE_100_Index">FTSE 100</a>, Madrid&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBEX_35">IBEX 35</a> and the Frankfurt-based <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DAX">DAX</a> all posting gains.</p>
<p>At midday, the dollar had lost ground against the euro (down  1.072%), the yen (down 0.010%) and the pound sterling (down 0.785%).</p>
<p><strong><u>News and Related Story Links:</u></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Bloomberg:</strong><br />
  <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&#038;sid=ahjd9T6V0NNs&#038;refer=home">U.S.  Stocks Gain on Earnings; Intel, JPMorgan, Wells Fargo Rise</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>MarketWatch:</strong><br />
  <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/us-stocks-rally-upbeat-earnings/story.aspx?guid=%7BAFEAC9CA%2DF64E%2D4420%2DB46C%2DADF2A4AF7E6F%7D">U.S.  stocks rally on upbeat Intel, J.P. Morgan results</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Reuters:</strong><br />
  <a href="http://www.reuters.com/finance/markets">Stock Market News &amp; Quotes</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/16/midday-market-update-u.s.-shares-gain-on-fresh-round-of-earnings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
