<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Investment News: Money Morning &#187; BP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moneymorning.com/category/bp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moneymorning.com</link>
	<description>Investment News Provider</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:52:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>After Friday’s Record Surge, Oil Prices Will Certainly be the Top Story This Week</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/06/09/record-oil-prices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/06/09/record-oil-prices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 10:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Patalon III</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main Essay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Patalon III]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/06/09/after-friday%e2%80%99s-record-surge-oil-prices-will-certainly-be-the-top-story-this-week/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

    By William Patalon III
    Executive Editor
    Money Morning/The Money Map Report
When Morgan Stanley (MS) predicted that oil  prices would reach $150 per barrel by mid-summer, its analysts certainly didn&#8217;t  mean it would happen all in one day.
But a confluence of powerful catalysts &#8211; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><body></p>
<h3 align="left">
    <strong>By William Patalon III</strong><br />
    <strong>Executive Editor</strong><br />
    <strong>Money Morning/The Money Map Report</strong></h3>
<p>When <strong>Morgan Stanley (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=ms">MS</a>)</strong> predicted that oil  prices would reach $150 per barrel by mid-summer, its analysts certainly didn&#8217;t  mean it would happen all in one day.</p>
<p>But a confluence of powerful catalysts &#8211; that aggressive prediction,  some militant interest-rate language from the European Central Bank, Middle  East conflict worries and a lousy employment report &#8211; launched oil prices into <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=a7Yk1v79J84k&amp;refer=news">their  biggest one-day gain</a> in history, setting a new record high in the process.</p>
<p>Make this bet: All eyes will be on oil prices today. And  depending on what happens today, it&#8217;s entirely possible that oil prices will be  the story of the week &#8211; all week. Let&#8217;s watch and see <strong>[<a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/06/09/special-report-six-ways-to-profit-from-the-one-two-punch-of-soaring-oil-prices-and-zooming-inflation/">Check out the related special-investment story elsewhere in today's  issue of <em>Money Morning</em> by clicking here</a>]</strong>.</p>
<p>On another note, can anyone save <strong>Lehman Brothers Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=leh&amp;hl=en">LEH</a>)</strong>?&nbsp; With  the challenges the brokerage house faces, are we looking at another <strong>Bear Stearns Cos. Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=bsc&amp;hl=en&amp;meta=hl%3Den">BSC</a>)</strong>?  Or have the &#8220;gloom-and-doomers&#8221; &#8211; who wage war using rumor and innuendo as their  weapons of choice &#8211; gone too far, a reality that would only benefit  short-sellers and speculators?</p>
<p>With U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke having  run his mouth a tad more than necessary last week, central-bank watchers  over-analyzed his views on the greenback, <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/06/06/the-u.s.-economy%e2%80%99s-uncertainty-brings-opportunity-for-investors-in-the-months-to-come/">the  inflationary period of the 70</a>s, and the impact of the stimulus package.</p>
<p>The dollar took yet another beating on Friday. And that  downward trend may well continue.</p>
<p>Economic reports will keep investors on their toes this  week. Coming up this week: Trade balance tomorrow (Tuesday); Fed Beige Book  (Wednesday); retail sales (Thursday); consumer price index (CPI) (Friday).</p>
<p>The Beige Book release will allow  Fed watchers another look into the mindset of Bernanke and Co., though, by now,  most &#8220;experts&#8221; expect the next rate move to be higher (although that was before  the weak unemployment report, and before the ECB threatened to raise its rates,  too).</p>
<p>The recent positive news about  consumer activity will be confirmed (or denied) as the May retail sales report  provides more insight into the initial effects of the stimulus package. While  discounters will reap the biggest benefits, the bigger test will come when we  see how the &#8220;big-box&#8221; department stores and the luxury retailers manage to  fare.</p>
<p>The late-week CPI release will  give economists a good feel for just how much the escalating food and energy  prices are feeding into inflation &#8211; meaning we can no longer buy into the Fed&#8217;s  whole spiel about looking past the overall number to focus on the so-called  &#8220;core&#8221; numbers, which exclude &#8220;volatile&#8221; food-and-energy prices.</p>
<p><b>Story continues below&#8230;</b></p>
<table align="center" style="background:#E0E7C2">
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Sign up right now, and we&#8217;ll send you an important new report for free: &#8220;The Three Best Investments in Asia.&#8221;</font></strong>
	  </p>
<form method="post" action="http://www.aweber.com/scripts/addlead.pl">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_web_form_id" value="163867">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_split_id" value="">
<input type="hidden" name="unit" value="money-morning">
<input type="hidden" name="redirect" value="http://www.moneymorning.com/confirmsiup">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_redirect_onlist" value="">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_adtracking" value="X300HJG4">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_message" value="1">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_required" value="from">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_forward_vars" value="0">
<form method="post" action="http://www.aweber.com/scripts/addlead.pl">
            <center> <img src="http://www.moneymorning.com/images2/MMSignUp.gif" /><br />
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><br />
      </font> </p>
<input type="submit" name="submit" value="Subscribe Now!" onClick="var s=s_gi(s_account); s.linkTrackVars='eVar2,eVar10,events'; s.linkTrackEvents='event3'; s.events='event3'; s.eVar10 ='609'; s.tl(this,'o','Subscribe to Newsletter');" />
<input type="text" name="from" value="" size="20" />
</center><br />
</form>
<p></font></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><strong>Market Matters</strong></p>
<p>With <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=acgo8oicuDJU">Sen.  Hillary Clinton&#8217;s Saturday withdrawal</a> from the Democratic presidential  campaign, it&#8217;s all over but the shouting (and the backstabbing, political  spinning, name-calling, negative ads, rumors, polls, debates and everything a  good residential campaign season needs). Both parties having finally made their  choices, and the American people now can begin dissecting the differences  between senators John McCain and Barack Obama. Among those differences:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Taxes:</strong> McCain plans to make recent cuts permanent and reduce the corporate rate. Obama  will keep cuts in place (unless you make over $250,000) and will probably raise  the capital-gains-tax rate.
</li>
<li><strong>Health  Care:</strong> McCain will focus on the individual and will incentivize folks to get  insurance.&nbsp; Obama will turn to the  government and install company mandates to bring costs down.
</li>
<li><strong>Gas  Prices: </strong>McCain flirted with the economically worthless (and perhaps  damaging) idea of a &#8220;gas-tax holiday.&#8221;&nbsp;  Obama, like most economists, opposed such a measure.&nbsp; So let the campaign season (and partisan  bickering) begin.</li>
</ul>
<p>Financials were again in the news this week (what a shock) with Lehman, <strong>Merrill Lynch &amp; Co. Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=mer&amp;hl=en&amp;meta=hl%3Den">MER</a>)</strong> and Morgan Stanley &#8211; as well as bond insurers <strong>MBIA</strong> <strong>Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=mbi&amp;hl=en&amp;meta=hl%3Den">MBI</a>)</strong> and <strong>Ambac Financial Group Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=ambac&amp;hl=en">ABK</a></strong>) &#8211; all  suffering the wrath of <strong>Standard &amp;  Poor&#8217;s Inc</strong>. through ratings downgrades.&nbsp; <strong>Bank of America</strong> <strong>Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABAC">BAC</a>)</strong> and <strong>JP Morgan Chase</strong> <strong>&amp; Co. Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=jpm&amp;hl=en&amp;meta=hl%3Den">JPM</a>)</strong> may not be far behind.&nbsp;&nbsp; </p>
<p>Of all the companies in this group, Lehman, in fact, seemed to be in the  weakest position, inviting comparisons to Bear Stearns as rumors circulate that  Lehman&#8217;s management team is looking to sources in South Korea for a capital infusion  of $4 billion.</p>
<p>Write-downs and losses prompted a few executive casualties as <strong>Wachovia Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=wb&amp;hl=en&amp;meta=hl%3Den">WB</a>) </strong>said bye-bye to its chief executive officer and <strong>Washington Mutual Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=wm&amp;hl=en&amp;meta=hl%3Den">WM</a>) </strong>stripped its CEO of his chairman&#8217;s title.&nbsp;  From an earnings perspective, <strong>Thomson  Reuters</strong> <strong>Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ATRI">TRI</a>) </strong>projected  that aggregate profits of <strong>Standard &amp;  Poor&#8217;s 500 Index</strong> companies declined by 17.5% in the first quarter with  financials leading the way.&nbsp; On a more  optimistic note, transactions seem to be back in favor as <strong><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/06/05/verizon-to-buy-alltel-for-28-billion-vaults-past-att-as-no.-1-u.s.-mobile-provider/">Verizon  Wireless is acquiring Alltel  Communications</a> </strong>for $28 billion, and <strong>The J.M. Smucker Co. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=jm+smuckers">SJM</a>)</strong> will to buy  Folgers from <strong>The Procter &amp; Gamble  Co. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=pg&amp;hl=en&amp;meta=hl%3Den">PG</a>)</strong> for just under $3 billion.&nbsp; (Apparently,  nothing goes better with some dark roasted java than strawberry jam.)</p>
<p>Oil fell during the early part of last week on declining demand before  reversing course Thursday and Friday en route to a two-day, $16 surge to a new  high &#8211; <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/06/07/oil-bulls-its-way-above-139-on-its-way-to-a-new-record-as-the-u.s.-dollar-resumes-its-descent/">at  one point Friday actually trading north of the $139 a barrel mark</a> &#8211; due to a  weak dollar, Mideast turmoil and a Morgan Stanley prediction of $150 a barrel  oil.</p>
<p>As drivers in more states find $4 gasoline becoming a reality (weekend  cable news reports stated that $5 a gallon gasoline would seem be a reality in  California), the <strong><a href="http://www.rbccm.com/">RBC Capital Markets Group</a></strong> of the <strong>Royal Bank of Canada (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:RY">RY</a>)</strong> released a  survey that showed that 90% of Americans are altering their spending patterns  to cope with the new price realities. <strong>The  Cheesecake Factory Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=cake&amp;hl=en&amp;meta=hl%3Den">CAKE</a>)</strong>, <strong>Brinker International Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=eat&amp;hl=en&amp;meta=hl%3Den">EAT</a>)</strong> &#8211; the owner of the Chili&#8217;s Bar &amp; Grill chain) and <strong>Starbucks Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=sbux&amp;hl=en&amp;meta=hl%3Den">SBUX</a>)</strong> are among those companies suffering ill-effects of &#8220;bargain dining.&#8221;&nbsp; <strong>General  Motors Corp.</strong> (<strong><a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=gm&amp;hl=en&amp;meta=hl%3Den">GM</a>)</strong> plans to cease production at four domestic truck plants and may be selling its  once-popular Hummer line (a combination SUV/urban-assault vehicles.</p>
<p><strong>Continental</strong> <strong>Airlines Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=cal&amp;hl=en&amp;meta=hl%3Den">CAL</a>)  became</strong> the latest airline to fall victim to the energy crisis, announcing  3,000 job cuts and reduced routes.&nbsp; </p>
<p>For four days, volatility ruled the day as investors experienced drastic  mood shifts amid favorable retail data and continued financial company  woes.&nbsp; On Friday, however, the bears  returned in a big way.&nbsp; The weak May  unemployment data and dramatic oil surge instilled widespread panic with the  Dow falling almost 400 points.&nbsp; Expect a  continuation of the daily volatility throughout the summer as investors try to  mix in a vacation (or two), while making heads or tails about these energy and  labor trends.&nbsp; But does anyone deserve an  extended vacation more than Hillary?&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </p>
<p align="center">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </p>
<table width="449" border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" bordercolor="#333333">
<tr>
<td width="73" valign="top">
        <strong>Market/ Index</strong> </td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>Year Close (2007)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="71" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>Qtr Close (03/31/07)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>Previous Week</strong><br />
            <strong>(05/30/08)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>Current Week </strong><br />
            <strong>(06/06/08)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="93" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>YTD Change</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="73" valign="top">
<p>Dow Jones Industrial </p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">13,264.82<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="71" valign="top">
<p align="right">12,262.89</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">12,638.32</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>12,209.81</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="93" valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>-7.95%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="73" valign="top">
<p>NASDAQ</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">2,652.28<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="71" valign="top">
<p align="right">2,279.10</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">2,522.66</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>2,474.56</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="93" valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>-6.70%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="73" valign="top">
<p>S&amp;P 500</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">1,468.36<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="71" valign="top">
<p align="right">1,322.70</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">1,400.38</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>1.360.68</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="93" valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>-7.33%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="73" valign="top">
<p>Russell 2000 </p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">766.03<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="71" valign="top">
<p align="right">687.97</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">748.28</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>740.37</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="93" valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>-3.35%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="73" valign="top">
<p>Fed Funds</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">4.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="71" valign="top">
<p align="right">2.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">2.00%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>2.00%</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="93" valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>-225 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="73" valign="top">
<p>10 yr Treasury (Yield)</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">4.04%<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="71" valign="top">
<p align="right">3.43%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">4.05%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>3.91%</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="93" valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>-13 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><strong>Economically Speaking</strong><br />
    <strong><em>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </em></strong><br />
  As noted above, Fed Chair  Bernanke returned to the limelight last week with a few Greenspanesque comments  that &#8220;rattled&#8221; economists and investors alike.&nbsp;&nbsp;  His surprising mention of the weak dollar seemed to confirm that  inflation is much higher than recession on his radar screen these days, and put  prospects for a future rate cut somewhere between &#8220;slim&#8221; and &#8220;none.&#8221; While Dr.  B. sees price pressures as &#8220;<em>unwelcome</em>,&#8221;  he does not expect a repeat of the double-digit inflationary times of the  1970s.&nbsp; Bernanke also believes that the  $168 billion fiscal stimulus package, as well as the Fed&#8217;s own rate cuts, will  positively impact the economy in the second half of the year (though his &#8220;<em>somewhat better economic conditions</em>&#8221;  comment was not quite as strong as many would have liked to hear).&nbsp;&nbsp; </p>
<p>While manufacturing activity  increased slightly in May, the ISM index still revealed overall sector  contraction.&nbsp; On the other hand, stronger-than-expected  factory orders helped put a positive light on the future of the sector.&nbsp; Housing continued to offer little reasons for  optimism as construction spending declined again, while the rate of  foreclosures climbed to a record high in the first quarter and potentially  claimed another victim, Ed McMahon, who is $644,000 in arrears on his $4.8  million mortgage.&nbsp; (Maybe the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Publishers_Clearing_House">Publishers Clearing  House</a> Sweepstakes folks will ring his doorbell with some good news, soon).</p>
<p>Consumers took those government  rebate checks straight to <strong>Wal-Mart</strong> <strong>Stores Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=wmt&amp;hl=en&amp;meta=hl%3Den">WMT</a>)</strong> and <strong>Costco Wholesale Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ:COST">COST</a>)</strong> last month  as both discounters reported better-than-expected same-store sales.&nbsp; In fact, the <strong>UBS AG (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AUBS">UBS</a>)  International Council of Shopping Centers </strong>sales survey<strong> </strong>showed that <a href="http://www.icsc.org/srch/apps/newsdsp.php?storyid=2426&amp;region=main">retail  activity soared 3% in May</a>, well in excess of prior projections.&nbsp; On the labor front, the unemployment rate  surprisingly soared to 5.5%, its highest level since October 2004, and the  biggest one-month increase in 22 years. The economy lost 49,000 jobs last  month, its fifth consecutive decline and another sign of continued  sluggishness.</p>
<p><strong>Weekly Economic Calendar</strong></p>
<table width="348" border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" bordercolor="#333333">
<tr>
<td width="44" valign="top">
        <strong>Date</strong> </td>
<td width="104" valign="top">
<p><strong>Release</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="192" valign="top">
<p><strong>Comments </strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="44" valign="top">
<p>June 2</p>
</td>
<td width="104" valign="top">
<p>Construction Spending (04/08)</p>
</td>
<td width="192" valign="top">
<p>Continued weakness in home    building activity </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="44" valign="top">
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="104" valign="top">
<p>ISM &#8211; Manu (05/08)</p>
</td>
<td width="192" valign="top">
<p>Better than expected showing,    though sector contraction </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="44" valign="top">
<p>June 3</p>
</td>
<td width="104" valign="top">
<p>Factory Orders (04/08)</p>
</td>
<td width="192" valign="top">
<p>Increase in non-durable goods    orders like paper products</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="44" valign="top">
<p>June 4</p>
</td>
<td width="104" valign="top">
<p>ISM &#8211; Services (05/08)</p>
</td>
<td width="192" valign="top">
<p>2nd straight month    of non-manufacturing sector growth </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="44" valign="top">
<p>June 5</p>
</td>
<td width="104" valign="top">
<p>Initial Jobless Claims (05/31/08)</p>
</td>
<td width="192" valign="top">
<p>Decline in claims offered    promise for labor market </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="44" valign="top">
<p>June 6</p>
</td>
<td width="104" valign="top">
<p>Unemployment Rate (05/08)</p>
</td>
<td width="192" valign="top">
<p>Highest rate since October 2004</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="44" valign="top">
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="104" valign="top">
<p>Nonfarm Payroll Additions (05/08)</p>
</td>
<td width="192" valign="top">
<p>5th straight monthly    payroll decline </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="44" valign="top">
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="104" valign="top">
<p>Consumer Credit (04/08)</p>
</td>
<td width="192" valign="top">
<p>Higher than expected borrowing    from personal loans</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="44" valign="top">
<p><strong>The Week Ahead</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="104" valign="top">
<p><strong>&nbsp;</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="192" valign="top">
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="44" valign="top">
<p>June 10</p>
</td>
<td width="104" valign="top">
<p>Trade Balance (04/08)</p>
</td>
<td width="192" valign="top">
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="44" valign="top">
<p>June 11</p>
</td>
<td width="104" valign="top">
<p>Fed Beige Book</p>
</td>
<td width="192" valign="top">
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="44" valign="top">
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="104" valign="top">
<p>Budget Statement (05/08)</p>
</td>
<td width="192" valign="top">
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="44" valign="top">
<p>June 12</p>
</td>
<td width="104" valign="top">
<p>Initial Jobless Claims (06/07/08)</p>
</td>
<td width="192" valign="top">
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="44" valign="top">
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td width="104" valign="top">
<p>Retail Sales (05/08)</p>
</td>
<td width="192" valign="top">
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="44" valign="top">
<p>June 13</p>
</td>
<td width="104" valign="top">
<p>CPI (05/08)</p>
</td>
<td width="192" valign="top">
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><strong>&nbsp;</strong></p>
<p><strong><u>News and Related Story Links:</u></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Bloomberg  News:<br />
  </strong><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=a7Yk1v79J84k&amp;refer=news">Oil  Rises to Record on Weakening Dollar, Morgan Stanley Outlook</a>.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Bloomberg  News:</strong><br />
  <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=acgo8oicuDJU">Clinton  Concedes Race, Throws `Full&#8217; Support to Obama</a>.<strong></strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Wikipedia:<br />
  </strong><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Publishers_Clearing_House">Publishers  Clearing House</a>.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>International  Council of Shopping Centers:</strong><br />
  <a href="http://www.icsc.org/srch/apps/newsdsp.php?storyid=2426&amp;region=main">U.S.  chain store sales jumped 3 percent in May</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p></body><br />
</html></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/06/09/record-oil-prices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BP Exec Questioned in Corporate Tax Probe as Russia Reclaims its Energy Sector</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/06/05/bp-exec-questioned/</link>
		<comments>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/06/05/bp-exec-questioned/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 18:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Simpkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Simpkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/06/05/bp-exec-questioned-in-corporate-tax-probe-as-russia-reclaims-its-energy-sector/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
By Jason Simpkins
Associate  Editor
Russian authorities have issued a summons to Robert Dudley,  Chief Executive of BP PLC&#8217;s (ADR: BP) regional joint  venture TNK-BP Holding,  as part of a tax probe into OAO TNK&#8217;s activities between 2001 and 2003. 
While BP was quick to write the summons off as a &#8220;routine procedural [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><body></p>
<h3>By Jason Simpkins<br />
<strong>Associate  Editor</strong></h3>
<p>Russian authorities have issued a summons to Robert Dudley,  Chief Executive of BP PLC&#8217;s (ADR: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=bp&amp;hl=en">BP</a>) regional joint  venture <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=RTB%3ATNBP">TNK-BP Holding</a>,  as part of a tax probe into OAO TNK&#8217;s activities between 2001 and 2003. </p>
<p>While BP was quick to write the summons off as a &#8220;routine procedural  matter,&#8221; analysts see it as yet another attempt to drive BP from the country&#8217;s  treasured energy sector. </p>
<p>A source close to the situation told <strong><em>Reuters</em></strong> that the investigation will take place next week. </p>
<p>&#8220;The questioning was planned for this week, but for some  reason they have already postponed it to early next week,&#8221; the source said. </p>
<p><b>Story continues below&#8230;</b></p>
<table align="center" style="background:#E0E7C2">
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Sign up right now, and we&#8217;ll send you an important new report for free: &#8220;The Three Best Investments in Asia.&#8221;</font></strong>
				</p>
<form method="post" action="http://www.aweber.com/scripts/addlead.pl">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_web_form_id" value="163867">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_split_id" value="">
<input type="hidden" name="unit" value="money-morning">
<input type="hidden" name="redirect" value="http://www.moneymorning.com/confirmsiup">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_redirect_onlist" value="">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_adtracking" value="X300HJG4">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_message" value="1">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_required" value="from">
<input type="hidden" name="meta_forward_vars" value="0">
<form method="post" action="http://www.aweber.com/scripts/addlead.pl">
            <center> <img src="http://www.moneymorning.com/images2/MMSignUp.gif" /><br />
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><br />
      </font> </p>
<input type="submit" name="submit" value="Subscribe Now!" onClick="var s=s_gi(s_account); s.linkTrackVars='eVar2,eVar10,events'; s.linkTrackEvents='event3'; s.events='event3'; s.eVar10 ='604'; s.tl(this,'o','Subscribe to Newsletter');" />
<input type="text" name="from" value="" size="20" />
</center><br />
</form>
<p></font></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>The timing of the summons is precarious in that it comes  just a week after BP&#8217;s Russian partners demanded Dudley&#8217;s removal &#8211; an overture  BP has rebuffed citing Dudley&#8217;s strong performance. </p>
<p>However, Mikhail Fridman, Vikto Vekselberg and Len Blavatnik  lead a group of billionaire shareholders who have accused Dudley of favoring  the British company&#8217;s interest. Dudley worked at BP before assuming his current  position as the head of TNK-BP in 2003.</p>
<p>The summons also follows a series of other setbacks that  have bedeviled the venture.&nbsp; Earlier this  year, 78 Federal Security Service (FSB) officers raided the Moscow offices of  BP and TNK-BP. The raid resulted in the arrest of one TNK-BP employee and his  brother, who will both face charges of industrial espionage. </p>
<p>Soon after the raid, the Natural Resources ministry said it  would check TNK-BP&#8217;s largest oil field for environmental violations and the  Interior Ministry accused the company of breaking visa rules, a charge that  left some BP staff stranded outside the country. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2007/09/19/the-new-%e2%80%9ccold%e2%80%9d-war-how-russia-has-turned-its-energy-exports-into-weapons-of-diplomacy/">Russia&#8217;s  history of wrangling control of oil projects from foreign oil majors</a> has  many analysts anticipating BP will have its role reduced to that of a minority  shareholder. </p>
<p>&#8220;We are all worried there is going to be some political  maneuvering in order to relieve BP of the stake,&#8221; Colin Morton, a fund manager  at Rensburg Fund Management who owns BP shares, recently told <em><strong>Reuters</strong></em>.&nbsp;</p>
<p>  Two years ago, <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=681984">OAO  Yukos Oil Co.</a>, formerly one of the world&#8217;s largest private oil companies,  went out of business after Russia&#8217;s Federal Tax Service demanded the payment of  $30 billion in back taxes.</p>
<p>  Soon after, Royal Dutch Shell PLC (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ARDS.A">RDS.A</a>, <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ARDS.B">RDS.B</a>) was forced  to relinquish control of its Sakhalin-2 oil and gas project to <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=RTD%3AGAZP">OAO Gazprom</a> for $7.45  billion when the Russian government threatened to block investment plans by  canceling building permits on environmental grounds. </p>
<p>  And just last year, TNK-BP was talked into selling its 62.8% stake in one of  the world&#8217;s largest gas fields, the Kovytkta field, to Gazprom, after Russian  authorities threatened to revoke the company&#8217;s license to develop it.&nbsp;</p>
<p>  So it&#8217;s perfectly reasonable to believe that TNK-BP, Russia&#8217;s third-largest  oil producer, could be Gazprom&#8217;s next takeover target. It&#8217;s also reasonable to  expect that Gazprom may want more than to simply replace the Russian oligarchs  as junior partners in the venture.</p>
<p>  <strong><em>RBK Daily</em></strong> recently reported that Gazprom is seeking a 1% stake  in the joint venture from BP, while at the same time buying out TNK-BP&#8217;s three  Russian shareholders, thereby giving the state monopoly a controlling stake in  TNK-BP.</p>
<p>  Meanwhile, a source close to BP told the <strong><em>Wall Street Journal</em></strong>,  that <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121266279869848153.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">the  company believes the Russian shareholders are putting pressure on Dudley in  attempt to strengthen their hand in negotiations with a state-owned company  like Gazprom</a>. The Russian shareholders want to rein in long-term  investments, such as enhanced oil recovery, health and safety, and privileged  dividends, because they are aiming to sell their share to a state-run firm, the  source told the paper. </p>
<p>BP Chief Executive Tony Hayward recently arrived in Moscow  in part to attend the annual shareholders&#8217; meeting of Russia&#8217;s <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=RTC%3AROSN">OAO Rosneft</a>, the  country&#8217;s largest oil firm of which BP is a minority shareholder, <strong><em>Reuters</em></strong> reported. </p>
<p>&#8220;BP is committed to Russia,&#8221; Hayward said addressing the  meeting. &#8220;Russia, alongside the Middle East, is one of the world&#8217;s great  hydrocarbon provinces. Russia is a great nation in the process of economic  transformation.&#8221;</p>
<p>While BP may remain committed to Russia, however, it doesn&#8217;t  seem as though Russia is equally committed to BP. And so far, the process of  undermining foreign oil companies and <em>surreptitiously</em> consolidating Russia&#8217;s energy  sector under state control has not ended with Vladimir Putin&#8217;s presidency. </p>
<p>&#8220;This is exactly the kind of issue that is making Medvedev&#8217;s  life so difficult as he tries to rebrand Russia as an attractive investment  location,&#8221; Chris Weafer, chief strategist Moscow-based investment bank <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=RTC%3AUSBN">OAO UralSib</a>, told <strong><em>Reuters</em></strong>.  &#8220;The fate of TNK-BP is a major test for how the government views the investment  climate.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong><u>News and Related Story Links:</u></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Reuters:</strong><br />
  <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNews/idUSL0528822820080605">Russia  summons TNK-BP CEO for questioning</a></li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Wall       Street Journal:</strong><br />
  <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121266279869848153.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">TNK-BP  CEO Questioned In Corporate Tax Probe</a></li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Money       Morning:</strong><br />
  <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/04/08/bp-caving-to-kremlin-pressure-over-joint-venture/" title="Permanent Link to BP Caving to Kremlin Pressure Over Joint Venture">BP  Caving to Kremlin Pressure Over Joint Venture</a></li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Money Morning:</strong><br />
    <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2007/09/19/the-new-%e2%80%9ccold%e2%80%9d-war-how-russia-has-turned-its-energy-exports-into-weapons-of-diplomacy/" title="Permanent Link to The New Cold War: How Russia Has Turned Its Energy Exports Into Weapons of Dipl ">The       New Cold War: How Russia Has Turned Its Energy Exports Into Weapons of       Diplomacy</a> </li>
</ul>
<p></body><br />
</html></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/06/05/bp-exec-questioned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
