<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: With Rio Tinto&#8217;s Snub of Chinalco, Aussie Backlash Against  China&#8217;s New Capitalists Continues to Escalate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/12/rio-tinto-chinalco-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/12/rio-tinto-chinalco-3/</link>
	<description>Investment News Provider</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:36:16 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Buy, Sell or Hold: BHP Billiton is the World's Premier Commodities Mining Play</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/12/rio-tinto-chinalco-3/comment-page-1/#comment-27741</link>
		<dc:creator>Buy, Sell or Hold: BHP Billiton is the World's Premier Commodities Mining Play</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=7698#comment-27741</guid>
		<description>[...] June, for example, BHP reached a $116 billion deal with Rio Tinto PLC (NYSE ADR: RTP) that will allow the two mining giants to merge their Western Australia iron-ore operations.&#160; Also, they are in a friendly $200 million takeover of United Minerals, which has deposits [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] June, for example, BHP reached a $116 billion deal with Rio Tinto PLC (NYSE ADR: RTP) that will allow the two mining giants to merge their Western Australia iron-ore operations.&nbsp; Also, they are in a friendly $200 million takeover of United Minerals, which has deposits [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Investment News Briefs</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/12/rio-tinto-chinalco-3/comment-page-1/#comment-24180</link>
		<dc:creator>Investment News Briefs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 06:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=7698#comment-24180</guid>
		<description>[...] country,&#8221; The Wall Street Journal reported. The accusation puts a strain on an already tense business dispute between Rio Tinto and Aluminum Corp. of China (NYSE ADR: ACH), known as Chinalco. Chinese foreign [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] country,&rdquo; The Wall Street Journal reported. The accusation puts a strain on an already tense business dispute between Rio Tinto and Aluminum Corp. of China (NYSE ADR: ACH), known as Chinalco. Chinese foreign [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Simpkins</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/12/rio-tinto-chinalco-3/comment-page-1/#comment-23308</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Simpkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=7698#comment-23308</guid>
		<description>Australia&#039;s exports increased 2.7% in the first quarter, adding 2.2 percentage points to gross domestic product.

Hence Treasury Secretery Henry&#039;s comment:

&quot;Today’s national accounts data shows a fairly large contribution to growth from net exports in the March quarter, and that follows a substantial contribution to growth from net exports in the December quarter. We’ve got two quarters now of strong contribution from net exports.&quot;

And I didn&#039;t say Australia shrugged off the recession. I said it shrugged off the global downturn to post 0.4% GDP growth in the first quarter.

Also, Prime Minister Rudd is somewhere near fluent in Mandarin.

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,22376210-662,00.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHUD10tVgFg

http://www.danwei.org/china_and_foreign_relations/aussie_rules.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Australia&#8217;s exports increased 2.7% in the first quarter, adding 2.2 percentage points to gross domestic product.</p>
<p>Hence Treasury Secretery Henry&#8217;s comment:</p>
<p>&#8220;Today’s national accounts data shows a fairly large contribution to growth from net exports in the March quarter, and that follows a substantial contribution to growth from net exports in the December quarter. We’ve got two quarters now of strong contribution from net exports.&#8221;</p>
<p>And I didn&#8217;t say Australia shrugged off the recession. I said it shrugged off the global downturn to post 0.4% GDP growth in the first quarter.</p>
<p>Also, Prime Minister Rudd is somewhere near fluent in Mandarin.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,22376210-662,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,22376210-662,00.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHUD10tVgFg" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHUD10tVgFg</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.danwei.org/china_and_foreign_relations/aussie_rules.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.danwei.org/china_and_foreign_relations/aussie_rules.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AW</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/12/rio-tinto-chinalco-3/comment-page-1/#comment-23214</link>
		<dc:creator>AW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 16:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=7698#comment-23214</guid>
		<description>Australia&#039;s Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, is nowhere near fluent in Mandarin!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Australia&#8217;s Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, is nowhere near fluent in Mandarin!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Crossing</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/12/rio-tinto-chinalco-3/comment-page-1/#comment-23204</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Crossing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 01:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=7698#comment-23204</guid>
		<description>Australian imports fell by 9 billion (2% of GDP), exports fell by 3 billion. This is the &quot;large contribution to growth&quot; from net exports.

The day after the GDP number came out it was announced that Australia had gone from a trade surplus to a trade deficit (for April I think). 

As to whether or not Australia has shrugged off the global downturn - the jury is still out on that one. 

Thanks to Steve Keen&#039;s Debtwatch site for this information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Australian imports fell by 9 billion (2% of GDP), exports fell by 3 billion. This is the &#8220;large contribution to growth&#8221; from net exports.</p>
<p>The day after the GDP number came out it was announced that Australia had gone from a trade surplus to a trade deficit (for April I think). </p>
<p>As to whether or not Australia has shrugged off the global downturn &#8211; the jury is still out on that one. </p>
<p>Thanks to Steve Keen&#8217;s Debtwatch site for this information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Gee</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/12/rio-tinto-chinalco-3/comment-page-1/#comment-23188</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Gee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=7698#comment-23188</guid>
		<description>Will there be a showdown between iron ore producers and buyers? If steel producers are not going to be profitable, they will cut back in production. This is a business reality. If this happens, steel price will go up and the fragile recovery will be further set back. Every body will lose including iron ore producers. On the other hand, if iron ore producers do not make a profit, they could not stay in business for long. Is this what comes down to? How ugly can this get?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will there be a showdown between iron ore producers and buyers? If steel producers are not going to be profitable, they will cut back in production. This is a business reality. If this happens, steel price will go up and the fragile recovery will be further set back. Every body will lose including iron ore producers. On the other hand, if iron ore producers do not make a profit, they could not stay in business for long. Is this what comes down to? How ugly can this get?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
