<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Contango Isn’t A Dance In Argentina: It is a Shot at Windfall Profits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/01/22/contango/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/01/22/contango/</link>
	<description>Investment News Provider</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:36:16 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Buy, Sell, or Hold: Profit From the Projected Oil-Price Rebound With Diamond Offshore</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/01/22/contango/comment-page-1/#comment-17364</link>
		<dc:creator>Buy, Sell, or Hold: Profit From the Projected Oil-Price Rebound With Diamond Offshore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 09:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4462#comment-17364</guid>
		<description>[...] of oil futures prices is showing a very marked upward slope, known in the commodities business as a forward curve in &#8220;contango.&#8221;&#160; This means that &#8211; the farther out we go &#8211; the higher and higher oil [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of oil futures prices is showing a very marked upward slope, known in the commodities business as a forward curve in &ldquo;contango.&rdquo;&nbsp; This means that &ndash; the farther out we go &ndash; the higher and higher oil [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Contango and storage arbitrage &#124; the daily john</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/01/22/contango/comment-page-1/#comment-15531</link>
		<dc:creator>Contango and storage arbitrage &#124; the daily john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4462#comment-15531</guid>
		<description>[...] there have been reports that tanker leasing costs are up dramatically on storage demands, the mid-range outlook is not strong for the tanker industry as ship builders [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there have been reports that tanker leasing costs are up dramatically on storage demands, the mid-range outlook is not strong for the tanker industry as ship builders [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Contango and storage arbitrage &#171; Knowledge Problem</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/01/22/contango/comment-page-1/#comment-15316</link>
		<dc:creator>Contango and storage arbitrage &#171; Knowledge Problem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 16:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4462#comment-15316</guid>
		<description>[...] there have been reports that tanker leasing costs are up dramatically on storage demands, the mid-range outlook is not strong for the tanker industry as ship builders [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there have been reports that tanker leasing costs are up dramatically on storage demands, the mid-range outlook is not strong for the tanker industry as ship builders [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exxon Records Biggest Profits in U.S. History</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/01/22/contango/comment-page-1/#comment-15283</link>
		<dc:creator>Exxon Records Biggest Profits in U.S. History</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4462#comment-15283</guid>
		<description>[...] Money Morning:  Contango Isn&#8217;t A Dance In Argentina: It is a Shot at Windfall Profits [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Money Morning:  Contango Isn&#8217;t A Dance In Argentina: It is a Shot at Windfall Profits [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/01/22/contango/comment-page-1/#comment-14718</link>
		<dc:creator>John C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4462#comment-14718</guid>
		<description>After reading the above article (Contango isn&#039;t a dance in Argentina, it is a shot at windfall profits.) I began analyzing the recommendations. Specific to the ETF&#039;s listed; USO, OIL.

 USO reflected over 12% in short interest compared to its peer group and individual prominent oil companies that collectively averaged 1%. USO was your first mentioned. Can you explain why their is such a high % of short interest against this position?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading the above article (Contango isn&#8217;t a dance in Argentina, it is a shot at windfall profits.) I began analyzing the recommendations. Specific to the ETF&#8217;s listed; USO, OIL.</p>
<p> USO reflected over 12% in short interest compared to its peer group and individual prominent oil companies that collectively averaged 1%. USO was your first mentioned. Can you explain why their is such a high % of short interest against this position?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart S</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/01/22/contango/comment-page-1/#comment-14704</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4462#comment-14704</guid>
		<description>Interesting article.  It is amazing how that when one knows something about a subject reporters almost always get something wrong.  I trade oil and there is indeed a currnet contango situation.  However on tuesday the June contract settled at 48.28 and March, the effective front month settled at 40.84, a difference of under $8.  The $38.81 refers to February which was going off the board and effectively irrelevant. So the cost of storage at 90c for 4 months (not 5) is $3.60.  So total profit potential is everything goes according to plan is more like $4 not the $8 quoted in the article. Author uses fuzzy math.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article.  It is amazing how that when one knows something about a subject reporters almost always get something wrong.  I trade oil and there is indeed a currnet contango situation.  However on tuesday the June contract settled at 48.28 and March, the effective front month settled at 40.84, a difference of under $8.  The $38.81 refers to February which was going off the board and effectively irrelevant. So the cost of storage at 90c for 4 months (not 5) is $3.60.  So total profit potential is everything goes according to plan is more like $4 not the $8 quoted in the article. Author uses fuzzy math.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/01/22/contango/comment-page-1/#comment-14703</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4462#comment-14703</guid>
		<description>Will USO et al actually work in a Contango situation?? I have read several articles that these funds that use futures will not make money if oil rises since its already built into futures prices.  True?  Not True?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will USO et al actually work in a Contango situation?? I have read several articles that these funds that use futures will not make money if oil rises since its already built into futures prices.  True?  Not True?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
