<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Subprime Borrowing Fueled the Credit Crisis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/01/13/subprime-borrowing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/01/13/subprime-borrowing/</link>
	<description>Investment News Provider</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:36:16 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: How Beatniks, Pyromaniacs and Gangsters Caused the Global Financial Crisis</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/01/13/subprime-borrowing/comment-page-1/#comment-14972</link>
		<dc:creator>How Beatniks, Pyromaniacs and Gangsters Caused the Global Financial Crisis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4309#comment-14972</guid>
		<description>[...] you think about it, the subprime mortgage business &#8211; with its casual disregard of lending standards, its enormously rapid expansion, and its [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you think about it, the subprime mortgage business &ndash; with its casual disregard of lending standards, its enormously rapid expansion, and its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama’s New Stimulus Plan May Be the Needle That Pops the Treasury-Bond Bubble</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/01/13/subprime-borrowing/comment-page-1/#comment-14933</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama’s New Stimulus Plan May Be the Needle That Pops the Treasury-Bond Bubble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4309#comment-14933</guid>
		<description>[...] Money Morning Deregulation Series Sidebar (Part IB): How Subprime Borrowing Fueled the Credit Crisis. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Money Morning Deregulation Series Sidebar (Part IB): How Subprime Borrowing Fueled the Credit Crisis. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Open Letter to President-Elect Barack Obama: How a Regulatory Makeover Can Fix the Financial Crisis</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/01/13/subprime-borrowing/comment-page-1/#comment-14554</link>
		<dc:creator>An Open Letter to President-Elect Barack Obama: How a Regulatory Makeover Can Fix the Financial Crisis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4309#comment-14554</guid>
		<description>[...] How Subprime Borrowing Fueled the Credit Crisis. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How Subprime Borrowing Fueled the Credit Crisis. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Subprime Borrowing Fueled the Credit Crisis &#124; Get-Finance.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/01/13/subprime-borrowing/comment-page-1/#comment-14396</link>
		<dc:creator>How Subprime Borrowing Fueled the Credit Crisis &#124; Get-Finance.co.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4309#comment-14396</guid>
		<description>[...] Originally posted here: How Subprime Borrowing Fueled the Credit Crisis [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Originally posted here: How Subprime Borrowing Fueled the Credit Crisis [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gail Devine</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/01/13/subprime-borrowing/comment-page-1/#comment-14381</link>
		<dc:creator>Gail Devine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4309#comment-14381</guid>
		<description>During the peak of the housing boom my husband and I sat back and discussed on several occasions how long this housing boom could last and what was going to happen when it popped.  Never did we think it would affect the economy the way it has nationally, and globally.  So now we look at the winner’s and the losers, and unless you stuffed your money under a mattress you no doubt lost a great deal of money, and or jobs.

Let’s make it clear I am not necessarily talking about money lost from this economic disaster; I’m talking about thousands of jobs lost (which also relates to oney), I’m talking about the fabric of our housing market.  Architects/Designers start the design process for a client, which generates jobs for Engineers and the title 24 compliance (if you live in California).  Those jobs generate jobs within our states and counties which in turn creates revenues for local counties/cities to keep those offices running.  I’m talking about the contractors and sub-contractors that need supplies to build.  I’m talking about the companies that make those supplies to build or remodel homes; I’m talking about state tax dollars from selling supplies to build, I’m talking about the home owner who spends more money to accessorize their home.  

This housing disaster we happen to be in was instigated from not just ignorant desperate Americans who wanted a slice of the great American pie but also by very brilliant key government officials (no names mentioned here since there are so many) preying on those same people.  I believe these government officials pushing the need to get poor people into homes they could not afford and other third party individuals who pushed the sub-prime paper loans to enable a individual who didn’t qualify for a home should be held accountable.  If they have any conscience what so ever I would think they would feel bad about their part in this disaster, but from personal experience these types of individuals are saying  “it’s not my fault their was a legal loop hole, the home owners should have know better”.  Even better “It’s just business, nothing personal”, from all of us affected by the above government officials and sub-prime pushers, it is very personal especially when your on the verge of loosing everything beyond your control.

We hear now that we need to focus on a resolution on the sub-prime sector in order to get housing back on track, but we are yet to here how we will help the people who create the jobs in the housing sector; Architects/Designers, Engineers, Builders, Suppliers, etc.  These businesses produce a multitude of jobs through a trickle down effect.  I recognize we need to focus on the sub-prime issues (cause, and recourse), but by bailing out bad individuals who made bad decisions, and not prosecuting the “sub-prim pushers” you are punishing everyone who did the right thing needed to get a slice of the American dream, and now risks loosing it all. 

mddesignhomes.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the peak of the housing boom my husband and I sat back and discussed on several occasions how long this housing boom could last and what was going to happen when it popped.  Never did we think it would affect the economy the way it has nationally, and globally.  So now we look at the winner’s and the losers, and unless you stuffed your money under a mattress you no doubt lost a great deal of money, and or jobs.</p>
<p>Let’s make it clear I am not necessarily talking about money lost from this economic disaster; I’m talking about thousands of jobs lost (which also relates to oney), I’m talking about the fabric of our housing market.  Architects/Designers start the design process for a client, which generates jobs for Engineers and the title 24 compliance (if you live in California).  Those jobs generate jobs within our states and counties which in turn creates revenues for local counties/cities to keep those offices running.  I’m talking about the contractors and sub-contractors that need supplies to build.  I’m talking about the companies that make those supplies to build or remodel homes; I’m talking about state tax dollars from selling supplies to build, I’m talking about the home owner who spends more money to accessorize their home.  </p>
<p>This housing disaster we happen to be in was instigated from not just ignorant desperate Americans who wanted a slice of the great American pie but also by very brilliant key government officials (no names mentioned here since there are so many) preying on those same people.  I believe these government officials pushing the need to get poor people into homes they could not afford and other third party individuals who pushed the sub-prime paper loans to enable a individual who didn’t qualify for a home should be held accountable.  If they have any conscience what so ever I would think they would feel bad about their part in this disaster, but from personal experience these types of individuals are saying  “it’s not my fault their was a legal loop hole, the home owners should have know better”.  Even better “It’s just business, nothing personal”, from all of us affected by the above government officials and sub-prime pushers, it is very personal especially when your on the verge of loosing everything beyond your control.</p>
<p>We hear now that we need to focus on a resolution on the sub-prime sector in order to get housing back on track, but we are yet to here how we will help the people who create the jobs in the housing sector; Architects/Designers, Engineers, Builders, Suppliers, etc.  These businesses produce a multitude of jobs through a trickle down effect.  I recognize we need to focus on the sub-prime issues (cause, and recourse), but by bailing out bad individuals who made bad decisions, and not prosecuting the “sub-prim pushers” you are punishing everyone who did the right thing needed to get a slice of the American dream, and now risks loosing it all. </p>
<p>mddesignhomes.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzanne</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/01/13/subprime-borrowing/comment-page-1/#comment-14364</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4309#comment-14364</guid>
		<description>Actually, the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) did NOT mandate that banks lend to &quot;disadvantaged borrowers who otherwise couldn’t get mortgages to buy homes.&quot;  What CRA does require is that banks with community branches in disadvantaged communities stop discriminatory practices called redlining.  Redlining means that no matter what the credit worthiness of a borrow is, if he or she lived within certain boundaries, banks summarily dismissed their loan applications.  While redlining is technically illegal, banks continued to practice it anyway.  CRA said that if you want to do business in a community, you need to find ways to invest in it. 

This worked very well for over 30 years.  According to an independent study of 2006 mortgage loan data conducted by Traiger &amp; Hinckley LLP, CRA actually deterred banks from engaging in the kinds of risky and subprime lending that are provoking the foreclosure crisis.  In fact, the findings show:
1. CRA banks were significantly less likely than other lenders to make a high cost loan;
2. The average APR on high cost loans originated by CRA banks was appreciably lower than the average APR on high cost loans originated by other lenders;
3. CRA banks were more than twice as likely as other lenders to retain originated loans in their portfolios; and
4. Foreclosure rates were lower in metropolitan statistical areas with greater concentrations of bank branches.

The conclusion is that CRA actually deterred irresponsible lending.  Whether you agree with CRA or not, these are what the numbers show.  The Treasury Department, the Office of Thrifts, and the FDIC have all stated that CRA is in no way responsible for the situation we are in today.  Please stop spreading this lie or we will never be able to resolve the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) did NOT mandate that banks lend to &#8220;disadvantaged borrowers who otherwise couldn’t get mortgages to buy homes.&#8221;  What CRA does require is that banks with community branches in disadvantaged communities stop discriminatory practices called redlining.  Redlining means that no matter what the credit worthiness of a borrow is, if he or she lived within certain boundaries, banks summarily dismissed their loan applications.  While redlining is technically illegal, banks continued to practice it anyway.  CRA said that if you want to do business in a community, you need to find ways to invest in it. </p>
<p>This worked very well for over 30 years.  According to an independent study of 2006 mortgage loan data conducted by Traiger &amp; Hinckley LLP, CRA actually deterred banks from engaging in the kinds of risky and subprime lending that are provoking the foreclosure crisis.  In fact, the findings show:<br />
1. CRA banks were significantly less likely than other lenders to make a high cost loan;<br />
2. The average APR on high cost loans originated by CRA banks was appreciably lower than the average APR on high cost loans originated by other lenders;<br />
3. CRA banks were more than twice as likely as other lenders to retain originated loans in their portfolios; and<br />
4. Foreclosure rates were lower in metropolitan statistical areas with greater concentrations of bank branches.</p>
<p>The conclusion is that CRA actually deterred irresponsible lending.  Whether you agree with CRA or not, these are what the numbers show.  The Treasury Department, the Office of Thrifts, and the FDIC have all stated that CRA is in no way responsible for the situation we are in today.  Please stop spreading this lie or we will never be able to resolve the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Deregulation Eviscerated the Banking Sector Safety Net and Spawned the U.S. Financial Crisis</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/01/13/subprime-borrowing/comment-page-1/#comment-14340</link>
		<dc:creator>How Deregulation Eviscerated the Banking Sector Safety Net and Spawned the U.S. Financial Crisis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=4309#comment-14340</guid>
		<description>[...] If helping struggling borrowers pursue their homeownership dreams was such a noble cause, it might have been incumbent upon the senator to not block legislation advocating the curtailment of predatory lending practices. From 1989 through 2002, federal records show that Sen. Gramm was the top recipient of contributions from commercial banks and among the top five recipients of campaign contributions from Wall Street. [Click here to read &quot;How Subprime Borrowing Fueled the Credit Crisis.&quot;] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If helping struggling borrowers pursue their homeownership dreams was such a noble cause, it might have been incumbent upon the senator to not block legislation advocating the curtailment of predatory lending practices. From 1989 through 2002, federal records show that Sen. Gramm was the top recipient of contributions from commercial banks and among the top five recipients of campaign contributions from Wall Street. [Click here to read "How Subprime Borrowing Fueled the Credit Crisis."] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
