<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stocks May Not be Cheap Enough, Yet &#8211; And Here&#8217;s Why</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/19/price-earnings-ratio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/19/price-earnings-ratio/</link>
	<description>Investment News Provider</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:36:16 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jutia Group - Market Jitters &#38; Political Critters</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/19/price-earnings-ratio/comment-page-1/#comment-13540</link>
		<dc:creator>Jutia Group - Market Jitters &#38; Political Critters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=3923#comment-13540</guid>
		<description>[...] Keith Fitz-Gerald Money Morning   addthis_pub = &#039;jutiagroup&#039;; addthis_logo = &#039;http://www.jutiagroup.com/favicon.ico&#039;; addthis_brand [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Keith Fitz-Gerald Money Morning   addthis_pub = &#8216;jutiagroup&#8217;; addthis_logo = &#8216;http://www.jutiagroup.com/favicon.ico&#8217;; addthis_brand [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Stocks May Not be Cheap Enough, Yet – And Here’s Why &#187; Stock Prices Online</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/19/price-earnings-ratio/comment-page-1/#comment-13534</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Stocks May Not be Cheap Enough, Yet – And Here’s Why &#187; Stock Prices Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=3923#comment-13534</guid>
		<description>[...] market news by unknown         &#171; Mineweb - GOLD ANALYSIS - Gold - positives outweighing negatives &#8230; Rocket [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] market news by unknown         &laquo; Mineweb &#8211; GOLD ANALYSIS &#8211; Gold &#8211; positives outweighing negatives &#8230; Rocket [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Financial Blogosphere 12/19/08 &#124; MarketBlurbs.com</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/19/price-earnings-ratio/comment-page-1/#comment-13516</link>
		<dc:creator>Financial Blogosphere 12/19/08 &#124; MarketBlurbs.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=3923#comment-13516</guid>
		<description>[...] Money Morning:  &#8220;If Darda is right, and our research seems to suggest he is, so-called “cheap stocks” may not be all that cheap. For proof, we can turn to some plain-old high school math. P/E ratios are calculated by taking the price of a stock (the numerator, or the “P”) and dividing it by earnings per share (the denominator, or the “E”). The higher the denominator, the lower the P/E ratio and, by implication, the cheaper a stock appears.  However, if higher denominators can make stocks appear “cheap,” then the opposite is true, too, and that suggests that stock prices may have a lot farther to fall – despite the fact that they’ve already tumbled 40% or more.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Money Morning:  &#8220;If Darda is right, and our research seems to suggest he is, so-called “cheap stocks” may not be all that cheap. For proof, we can turn to some plain-old high school math. P/E ratios are calculated by taking the price of a stock (the numerator, or the “P”) and dividing it by earnings per share (the denominator, or the “E”). The higher the denominator, the lower the P/E ratio and, by implication, the cheaper a stock appears.  However, if higher denominators can make stocks appear “cheap,” then the opposite is true, too, and that suggests that stock prices may have a lot farther to fall – despite the fact that they’ve already tumbled 40% or more.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
