<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fed  Looking at Another Rate Cut, While Treasury Has New Plan for Housing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/08/fed-rate-cut-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/08/fed-rate-cut-2/</link>
	<description>Investment News Provider</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:36:16 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fed Slashes Interest Rates to a 0.0% to 0.25% Target Range ... But Now What?</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/08/fed-rate-cut-2/comment-page-1/#comment-13397</link>
		<dc:creator>Fed Slashes Interest Rates to a 0.0% to 0.25% Target Range ... But Now What?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=3635#comment-13397</guid>
		<description>[...] Money Morning: Fed Looking at Another Rate Cut, While Treasury Has New Plan for Housing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Money Morning: Fed Looking at Another Rate Cut, While Treasury Has New Plan for Housing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/08/fed-rate-cut-2/comment-page-1/#comment-13290</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=3635#comment-13290</guid>
		<description>Comment by Cynthia Stimpson on 9 December 2008:
I love what you guys do, but it seems that to get the ‘really good stuff’ (even a few specifics) we are often asked to purchase another subscription to yet another newsletter.
This is rather disheartening, and I wish you could consolidate
more information into ONE newsletter. It feels like a continuously splitting amoeba — from one to many, and from many to way too much! Too many different sources to read every day!

Could you please give us more information, such as a few of those plays on IMF injections. I assume it might be the ETFs of those countries, and it wouldn’t kill you to say so, either yes or no.

Thanks, and I really have the highest regard for your work!

~~~~~Response~~~~~~~
First of all, thank you. We’re glad you enjoy the service. We work really hard here to keep our readers well informed and ahead of the curve. But it’s important that you realize Money Morning is not a trading service. We focus on investment news and analysis, not stock recommendations. 

As an added benefit to our readers, we do occasionally offer some suggestions investors might want to consider as they position themselves to profit on the latest global investment trends. We also offer features such as our annual economic outlook series, “Hot Stocks,” and Horacio Marquez’s “Buy, Sell or Hold.” 

We consider all of the articles in Money Morning to be “really good stuff.” But you might well want to consider one or more of our premium services. Those come complete with stock recommendations and suggested portfolios. And those insights come from some of the smartest people in the industry.

Thanks again for being a loyal reader. And do trust that we hold our subscribers in the highest regard.

Jason Simpkins
Associate Editor
Money Morning</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment by Cynthia Stimpson on 9 December 2008:<br />
I love what you guys do, but it seems that to get the ‘really good stuff’ (even a few specifics) we are often asked to purchase another subscription to yet another newsletter.<br />
This is rather disheartening, and I wish you could consolidate<br />
more information into ONE newsletter. It feels like a continuously splitting amoeba — from one to many, and from many to way too much! Too many different sources to read every day!</p>
<p>Could you please give us more information, such as a few of those plays on IMF injections. I assume it might be the ETFs of those countries, and it wouldn’t kill you to say so, either yes or no.</p>
<p>Thanks, and I really have the highest regard for your work!</p>
<p>~~~~~Response~~~~~~~<br />
First of all, thank you. We’re glad you enjoy the service. We work really hard here to keep our readers well informed and ahead of the curve. But it’s important that you realize Money Morning is not a trading service. We focus on investment news and analysis, not stock recommendations. </p>
<p>As an added benefit to our readers, we do occasionally offer some suggestions investors might want to consider as they position themselves to profit on the latest global investment trends. We also offer features such as our annual economic outlook series, “Hot Stocks,” and Horacio Marquez’s “Buy, Sell or Hold.” </p>
<p>We consider all of the articles in Money Morning to be “really good stuff.” But you might well want to consider one or more of our premium services. Those come complete with stock recommendations and suggested portfolios. And those insights come from some of the smartest people in the industry.</p>
<p>Thanks again for being a loyal reader. And do trust that we hold our subscribers in the highest regard.</p>
<p>Jason Simpkins<br />
Associate Editor<br />
Money Morning</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fed May Cut Rates Again as Policymakers Meet</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/08/fed-rate-cut-2/comment-page-1/#comment-13229</link>
		<dc:creator>Fed May Cut Rates Again as Policymakers Meet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=3635#comment-13229</guid>
		<description>[...] leave members of the central bank&#8217;s policymaking Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) much room to maneuver. Still, the policymakers may have more ammunition in their arsenal and the statement that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] leave members of the central bank&rsquo;s policymaking Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) much room to maneuver. Still, the policymakers may have more ammunition in their arsenal and the statement that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia Stimpson</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/08/fed-rate-cut-2/comment-page-1/#comment-12967</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia Stimpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 01:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=3635#comment-12967</guid>
		<description>I love what you guys do, but it seems that to get the &#039;really good stuff&#039; (even a few specifics) we are often asked to purchase another subscription to yet another newsletter.

This is rather disheartening, and I wish you could consolidate
more information into ONE newsletter.  It feels like a continuously splitting amoeba -- from one to many, and from many to way too much!  Too many different sources to read every day!

Could you please give us more information, such as a few of those plays on IMF injections.  I assume it might be the ETFs of those countries, and it wouldn&#039;t kill you to say so, either yes or no.

Thanks, and I really have the highest regard for your work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love what you guys do, but it seems that to get the &#8216;really good stuff&#8217; (even a few specifics) we are often asked to purchase another subscription to yet another newsletter.</p>
<p>This is rather disheartening, and I wish you could consolidate<br />
more information into ONE newsletter.  It feels like a continuously splitting amoeba &#8212; from one to many, and from many to way too much!  Too many different sources to read every day!</p>
<p>Could you please give us more information, such as a few of those plays on IMF injections.  I assume it might be the ETFs of those countries, and it wouldn&#8217;t kill you to say so, either yes or no.</p>
<p>Thanks, and I really have the highest regard for your work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
