<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How China is Beating the United States in the Global Oil  Game</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/10/16/iraq-oil-deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/10/16/iraq-oil-deal/</link>
	<description>Investment News Provider</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:54:40 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: China-Russia Oil Accord a Sign of a Changing World</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/10/16/iraq-oil-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-21052</link>
		<dc:creator>China-Russia Oil Accord a Sign of a Changing World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=2712#comment-21052</guid>
		<description>[...] Money Morning Market Commentary:  How China is Beating the United States in the Global Oil Game. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Money Morning Market Commentary:  How China is Beating the United States in the Global Oil Game. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Energy Development in Iraq Faces Political Obstacles, but Could Prove a Boon for China</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/10/16/iraq-oil-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-20380</link>
		<dc:creator>Energy Development in Iraq Faces Political Obstacles, but Could Prove a Boon for China</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=2712#comment-20380</guid>
		<description>[...] So far, China has been the most successful at sidestepping Iraq&#8217;s blurry bureaucracy. And that presents an intriguing potential view of the future: Should the war-torn nation&#8217;s political web ever become untangled, the world&#8217;s second-largest oil consumer (China) could end up being the premier player in one of the world&#8217;s largest oil-producing nations. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So far, China has been the most successful at sidestepping Iraq&#8217;s blurry bureaucracy. And that presents an intriguing potential view of the future: Should the war-torn nation&#8217;s political web ever become untangled, the world&#8217;s second-largest oil consumer (China) could end up being the premier player in one of the world&#8217;s largest oil-producing nations. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How China is Beating the United States in the Global Oil Game &#124; Geiger Index - Keith Fitz-Gerald</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/10/16/iraq-oil-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-13487</link>
		<dc:creator>How China is Beating the United States in the Global Oil Game &#124; Geiger Index - Keith Fitz-Gerald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=2712#comment-13487</guid>
		<description>[...] Keith Fitz-Gerald Investment Director Money Morning Investment News/The Money Map [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Keith Fitz-Gerald Investment Director Money Morning Investment News/The Money Map [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JDsg</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/10/16/iraq-oil-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-11975</link>
		<dc:creator>JDsg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 07:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=2712#comment-11975</guid>
		<description>@ David Synnott (#4):

&lt;i&gt;I believe it is fair to say that Canada has the second place position in terms of the number of recoverable barrels of oil.&lt;/i&gt;

The problem with the oil sands inflating the amount of proved reserves in Canada is in the very nature of the oil sand itself.  These are heavy oils that most North American refineries simply aren&#039;t able to process.  Most N.A. refineries are set up to process light sweet crude, and are not able to process the oil sands concurrently.  Separate refineries must be created for the oil sands, such as Royal Dutch/Shell is proposing to do in Alberta.

I&#039;m not saying that the oil sands aren&#039;t an important oil reserve, and certainly the Canadian oil sands in particular are getting the attention they deserve; however, I think it&#039;s better to create a separate category for oil sand/extra heavy oil reserves, rather than to lump them into the proved reserves of conventional crude oil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ David Synnott (#4):</p>
<p><i>I believe it is fair to say that Canada has the second place position in terms of the number of recoverable barrels of oil.</i></p>
<p>The problem with the oil sands inflating the amount of proved reserves in Canada is in the very nature of the oil sand itself.  These are heavy oils that most North American refineries simply aren&#8217;t able to process.  Most N.A. refineries are set up to process light sweet crude, and are not able to process the oil sands concurrently.  Separate refineries must be created for the oil sands, such as Royal Dutch/Shell is proposing to do in Alberta.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that the oil sands aren&#8217;t an important oil reserve, and certainly the Canadian oil sands in particular are getting the attention they deserve; however, I think it&#8217;s better to create a separate category for oil sand/extra heavy oil reserves, rather than to lump them into the proved reserves of conventional crude oil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Baily</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/10/16/iraq-oil-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-11259</link>
		<dc:creator>George Baily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 07:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=2712#comment-11259</guid>
		<description>&quot;Perhaps it’s time we re-learned this lesson from China.&quot; ...hmmm hopefully instead of this becoming a desperate, competitive, and destructive scramble for the last oil, it&#039;s time to learn the obvious lessons that proponents of long-term sustainability have been talking about ever since I was in school.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Perhaps it’s time we re-learned this lesson from China.&#8221; &#8230;hmmm hopefully instead of this becoming a desperate, competitive, and destructive scramble for the last oil, it&#8217;s time to learn the obvious lessons that proponents of long-term sustainability have been talking about ever since I was in school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Although &#8220;Hot Money&#8221; Flees China the Red Dragon Will Emerge From Financial Crisis Unscathed</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/10/16/iraq-oil-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-11061</link>
		<dc:creator>Although &#8220;Hot Money&#8221; Flees China the Red Dragon Will Emerge From Financial Crisis Unscathed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=2712#comment-11061</guid>
		<description>[...] Money Morning:  How China is Beating the United States in the Global Oil Game [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Money Morning:  How China is Beating the United States in the Global Oil Game [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunshine Kills Vampires &#187; &#8220;IOUSA&#8221; taking back seat to Chinca in Iraqi Oil Deals</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/10/16/iraq-oil-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-11055</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunshine Kills Vampires &#187; &#8220;IOUSA&#8221; taking back seat to Chinca in Iraqi Oil Deals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 01:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=2712#comment-11055</guid>
		<description>[...] How China is Beating the United States in the Global Oil Game [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How China is Beating the United States in the Global Oil Game [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/10/16/iraq-oil-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-11052</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 23:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=2712#comment-11052</guid>
		<description>Why is your article &#039;How China is beating the US in the Oil Game&#039; totally misleading, instead of telling how and why the SECRET MASTERS have manipulated this matter?

Am I to believe that you, as someone who participates in the Financial Fields like I do, don&#039;t understand WHY China was &#039;handed&#039; this Iraq Oil Production contract, and WHY it&#039;s being paid in DOLLARS instead of OIL? 

Am I to believe that someone who participates in the Financial Fields like I do, knows absolutely NOTHING of how the SECRET MASTERS manipulate Nations?

If so, then you&#039;re words aren&#039;t worth reading – by anyone who needs to know how and why political and economic life is &#039;controlled&#039; by the SECRET MASTERS, or by anyone who wants to enjoy a writer who can &#039;tell it like it is&#039;.

First, we both know that China was handed this contract as a &#039;token&#039; payment in return for its continued participation in financing a Bankrupted US.

Second, China is being paid in &#039;losing value&#039; US Dollars instead of &#039;increasing value&#039; Oil, and it&#039;s being &#039;told&#039; to LIKE it.

Third, Oil is a &#039;fossil&#039; from the old, now dead Industrial Age. It&#039;s the &#039;old technology&#039; TOY that&#039;s being handed down to the &#039;new kid on the block&#039; while the rest of the older kids get to play with the NEW stuff (ethanol, solar, wind).

In this piece on CHINA, you take what REALLY happened, cover it in misleading facts, and use it to bash the US because it&#039;s moving into a new Energy direction. This piece is so misleading and hurtful to people who are looking to read socially insightful material that&#039;s relevant to their future and the future of their children (and by extension, the future of the human race).

As for your investment advise, I see that you&#039;re still in &#039;sales&#039;, a bird dog for the brokers, and not someone who is truly concerned with the financial well being of people. Peddling Stocks and Bonds to people is a &#039;sales&#039; job designed to &#039;sell&#039; fish instead of showing them HOW and WHY to fish. This too is an act of misleading people for self gain. For what, to make a buck?

I&#039;m a Futures Options Writer. I write 30 day Call &amp; Put Options in all the most liquid markets. This technique enables investor&#039;s to hedge their contract positions. It provides me an excellent business while providing an excellent liquidity service to the markets. I create win-win situations. I make a buck honestly and respectfully.

The more I read you, Keith, the more I realize you&#039;re still trapped in the old &#039;self-interest&#039;  mindset that plaques most of the other &#039;street&#039; people who salivate over making a buck more than producing a quality product. 

Take a hint from what&#039;s now happening to them. Start explaining political and financial occurrences truthfully. Don&#039;t fear the SECRET MASTERS – kick &#039;em in the groin! 

Do it for the good of people, and who knows, you just might wake up a good number of them, gain a whole lot of respect, and &#039;earn&#039; a nice income too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is your article &#8216;How China is beating the US in the Oil Game&#8217; totally misleading, instead of telling how and why the SECRET MASTERS have manipulated this matter?</p>
<p>Am I to believe that you, as someone who participates in the Financial Fields like I do, don&#8217;t understand WHY China was &#8216;handed&#8217; this Iraq Oil Production contract, and WHY it&#8217;s being paid in DOLLARS instead of OIL? </p>
<p>Am I to believe that someone who participates in the Financial Fields like I do, knows absolutely NOTHING of how the SECRET MASTERS manipulate Nations?</p>
<p>If so, then you&#8217;re words aren&#8217;t worth reading – by anyone who needs to know how and why political and economic life is &#8216;controlled&#8217; by the SECRET MASTERS, or by anyone who wants to enjoy a writer who can &#8216;tell it like it is&#8217;.</p>
<p>First, we both know that China was handed this contract as a &#8216;token&#8217; payment in return for its continued participation in financing a Bankrupted US.</p>
<p>Second, China is being paid in &#8216;losing value&#8217; US Dollars instead of &#8216;increasing value&#8217; Oil, and it&#8217;s being &#8216;told&#8217; to LIKE it.</p>
<p>Third, Oil is a &#8216;fossil&#8217; from the old, now dead Industrial Age. It&#8217;s the &#8216;old technology&#8217; TOY that&#8217;s being handed down to the &#8216;new kid on the block&#8217; while the rest of the older kids get to play with the NEW stuff (ethanol, solar, wind).</p>
<p>In this piece on CHINA, you take what REALLY happened, cover it in misleading facts, and use it to bash the US because it&#8217;s moving into a new Energy direction. This piece is so misleading and hurtful to people who are looking to read socially insightful material that&#8217;s relevant to their future and the future of their children (and by extension, the future of the human race).</p>
<p>As for your investment advise, I see that you&#8217;re still in &#8217;sales&#8217;, a bird dog for the brokers, and not someone who is truly concerned with the financial well being of people. Peddling Stocks and Bonds to people is a &#8217;sales&#8217; job designed to &#8217;sell&#8217; fish instead of showing them HOW and WHY to fish. This too is an act of misleading people for self gain. For what, to make a buck?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a Futures Options Writer. I write 30 day Call &amp; Put Options in all the most liquid markets. This technique enables investor&#8217;s to hedge their contract positions. It provides me an excellent business while providing an excellent liquidity service to the markets. I create win-win situations. I make a buck honestly and respectfully.</p>
<p>The more I read you, Keith, the more I realize you&#8217;re still trapped in the old &#8217;self-interest&#8217;  mindset that plaques most of the other &#8217;street&#8217; people who salivate over making a buck more than producing a quality product. </p>
<p>Take a hint from what&#8217;s now happening to them. Start explaining political and financial occurrences truthfully. Don&#8217;t fear the SECRET MASTERS – kick &#8216;em in the groin! </p>
<p>Do it for the good of people, and who knows, you just might wake up a good number of them, gain a whole lot of respect, and &#8216;earn&#8217; a nice income too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/10/16/iraq-oil-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-11048</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 16:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=2712#comment-11048</guid>
		<description>I really enlightened myself.Please do send similar mails in future regularlly
Hats off to you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enlightened myself.Please do send similar mails in future regularlly<br />
Hats off to you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOhn Heeckt</title>
		<link>http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/10/16/iraq-oil-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-11047</link>
		<dc:creator>JOhn Heeckt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 15:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moneymorning.com/?p=2712#comment-11047</guid>
		<description>We face two hugh problems going forward. The first is that large American corporations are American in name only. These corportations are essentially internation corporations with no particular loyalty to the U.S. or any other individual nation. It’s been said that ’tis better to have bad morals than no morals at all. Sadly, these corporations have no morals at all. Profit is their entire preoccupation …no matter how or where it comes from.
Our second problem is that from the presidency through Congress, relative to the challenges we face, our government has never been populated by a more genuinely ignorant group of people. And, particularly if the polls hold, it will get measurably worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We face two hugh problems going forward. The first is that large American corporations are American in name only. These corportations are essentially internation corporations with no particular loyalty to the U.S. or any other individual nation. It’s been said that ’tis better to have bad morals than no morals at all. Sadly, these corporations have no morals at all. Profit is their entire preoccupation …no matter how or where it comes from.<br />
Our second problem is that from the presidency through Congress, relative to the challenges we face, our government has never been populated by a more genuinely ignorant group of people. And, particularly if the polls hold, it will get measurably worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
